The DOI matches its Crossref record; 117 of the 117 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge
Abstract
Research in the area of educational technology has often been critiqued for a lack of theoretical grounding. In this article we propose a conceptual framework for educational technology by building on Shulrnan's formulation of “pedagogical content knowledge” and extend it to the phenomenon of teachers integrating technology into their pedagogy. This framework is the result of 5 years of work on a program of research focused on teacher professional development and faculty development in higher education. It attempts to capture some of the essential qualities of teacher knowledge required for technology integration in teaching, while addressing the complex, multifaceted, and situated nature of this knowledge. We argue, briefly, that thoughtful pedagogical uses of technology require the development of a complex, situated form of knowledge that we call Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK). In doing so, we posit the complex roles of, and interplay among, three main components of learning environments: content, pedagogy, and technology. We argue that this model has much to offer to discussions of technology integration at multiple levels: theoretical, pedagogical, and methodological. In this article, we describe the theory behind our framework, provide examples of our teaching approach based upon the framework, and illustrate the methodological contributions that have resulted from this work.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“First, the absence of systematic training constitutes a persistent structural limitation (Mishra & Koehler, 2006).”
From Adoption and Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Foreign Language Teaching: Multi-Institutional Analysis of Higher Education (2026) · cites this paper as Mishra & Koehler, 2006
In the citing paper
“The TPACK framework holds that mere exposure to AI tools is insufficient for effective teaching.”
From Adoption and Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Foreign Language Teaching: Multi-Institutional Analysis of Higher Education (2026) · cites this paper as Mishra & Koehler, 2006
In the citing paper
“Instructors require situated, discipline-specific training that addresses the intersection of AI capabilities (technological knowledge), language pedagogy (pedagogical knowledge), and linguistic content (content knowledge).”
From Adoption and Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Foreign Language Teaching: Multi-Institutional Analysis of Higher Education (2026) · cites this paper as Mishra & Koehler, 2006
In the citing paper
“Two conceptual frameworks were indicated in literature as frequently used for informing the design of teacher education digital capability programmes, and were well-supported by empirical research.”
From From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework (2020) · cites this paper as Mishra and Koehler's (2006)
In the citing paper
“Unlike SAMR, TPACK does not represent a hierarchy or staged progression, but rather presents a holistic model that theorises the relationship between, and contribution of, technological, pedagogical and content knowledge to effective curriculum learning-focused technology use.”
From From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework (2020) · cites this paper as Mishra and Koehler's (2006)
In the citing paper
“TPACK posits that effective technology integration is not about technology alone, but occurs at the dynamic intersection of three core domains of knowledge: Technological Knowledge (TK) (understanding the tools), Pedagogical Knowledge (PK) (understanding how people learn), and Content Knowledge (CK) (understanding the subject matter). TPACK's central tenet is that pedagogical goals and content”
From Paying the Cognitive Debt: An Experiential Learning Framework for Integrating AI in Social Work Education (2025) · cites this paper as Mishra & Koehler, 2006
In the citing paper
“TPACK emphasizes the dynamic integration of technology, pedagogy, and content (Mishra and Koehler, 2006), which enables teachers to move beyond basic tool operation and align technology with instructional goals.”
From AI teaching innovation behavior among college teachers: a structural equation modeling analysis based on the AI-TPACK framework, teaching self-efficacy, professional identity, and AI literacy (2026) · cites this paper as Mishra and Koehler, 2006
In the citing paper
“Despite promising developments, significant research gaps persist in understanding the optimal integration mechanisms for AIGC tools in cross-disciplinary learning9.”
From Integrating AI-generated content tools in higher education: a comparative analysis of interdisciplinary learning outcomes (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
In the citing paper
“The independent variables selected for the model were chosen based on a priori theoretical considerations [49–51] and underwent rigorous evaluation for multicollinearity”
In the citing paper
“The TPACK (Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) framework developed by Mishra & Koehler (2006) sets a crucial foundation for understanding how teachers integrate technologies, such as AI chatbots, into their practices”
From A cross-sectional look at teacher reactions, worries, and professional development needs related to generative AI in an urban school district (2025) · cites this paper as Mishra & Koehler, 2006
In the citing paper
“This finding is in line with previous research that demonstrates that introducing novel technology into classrooms is not just a financial or technical issue.”
From Understanding the determinants of novel technology adoption among teachers: the case of 3D printing (2020) · cites this paper as Mishra and Koehler 2006
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
SHULMAN, L. S. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015002004 · Cited by 18,546
Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform
Shulman, L. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 · Cited by 16,787
DEWEY, J. M. (1986) · The Educational Forum · doi:10.1080/00131728609335764 · Cited by 13,872
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition
Gibson, J. J. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315740218 · Cited by 12,132
Educating the reflective practitioner
Schön, D. A. (1987) · Cited by 11,335
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.40 · Cited by 8,742
(2014) · Palgrave Macmillan eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137399595.0007 · Cited by 8,328
DEWEY, J. M. (2026) · State University of New York Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9798855805482-007 · Cited by 5,217
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2001). Project 2061: Proceedings of the second AAAS technology education research conference. Washington DC: Author.
- Anderson R. D., and Mitchner C. P. (1994). Research on science teacher education. In and and Gabel D.L. (Ed.), Handbook of science teaching and learning (pp. 32—37). New York: Macmillan.
- Barab S. A., and Duffy T. M. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In Jonassen D., and Land S. (Eds.), Theoretical foundation of learning environments (pp. 25—56). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- 10.1177/016146810110300601 · DOI · Paper page
- Grossman P. (1990). The making of a teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Harel I., and Papert S. (1991). Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
- Koehler M. J., and Mishra P. (2002). Art from randomness. How Inverso uses chance to create haiku [Electronic version]. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning, 4(1). Retrieved June 29, 2004, from http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/2002/1/03/index.asp
- Lankshear C. (1997). Changing literacies. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
- Medawar P. B. (1963). Is the scientific paper a fraud? In and and Medawar P.B. (Ed.), The Threat and the glory (pp. 228—233). New York: HarperCollins.
- Mishra P. (1998). Learning complex concepts in chemistry with multiple representations: Theory based design and evaluation of a hypertext for the periodic system of elements. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
- 10.1108/978-1-60752-582-020251002 · DOI
- Papert S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In Papert S., and Harel I. (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 1—11). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
- Selfe C. (1990). Technology in the English classroom: Computers through the lens of feminist pedagogy. In and and Handa C. (Ed.), Computers and community: Teaching composition in the twenty-first century (pp. 118—139). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
- Simon H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Veal W. R., and MaKinster J. G. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge taxonomies [Electronic version]. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(4). Retrieved June 28, 2004 from http://unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/ejsev3n4.html.
- Vyas S., and Mishra P. (2002). The re-design of an after-school reading club. In Garner R., Gillingham M., and Zhao Y. (Eds.), Hanging out: After-school community based programs for children (pp. 75—93). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
- Wong D., Mishra P., Koehler M. J., and Siebenthal S. (in press). Teacher as filmmaker: iVideos, technology education, and professional development. In Girod M., and Steed J. (Eds.), Technology in the college classroom. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
- Zhao Y. (Ed.). (2003). What teachers should know about technology: Perspectives and practices. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
- Zhao Y., and Conway P. (2001). What's in and what's out? An analysis of state technology plans. Teachers College Record. Retrieved June 29, 2004, from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=10717
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,048
Papamitsiou, Z. K., Filippakis, M. E., Poulou, M. N., Sampson, D. G., Ifenthaler, D., & Giannakos, M. N. (2021) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-021-00163-w · Cited by 50
Yang, S., & Appleget, C. (2024) · Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/21532974.2024.2367573 · Cited by 55
Mathematics teaching, learning, and assessment in the digital age
Weigand, H.-G., Trgalová, J., & Tabach, M. (2024) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-024-01612-9 · Cited by 50
Teachers and teacher educators learning from new literacies and new technologies
McVee, M. B., Bailey, N. M., & Shanahan, L. E. (2008) · Teaching Education · doi:10.1080/10476210802250216 · Cited by 50
Deepening ICT integration through multilevel design of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Chai, C. S., Koh, E., Lim, C. P., & Tsai, C. (2014) · Journal of Computers in Education · doi:10.1007/s40692-014-0002-1 · Cited by 58
A structure equation model among factors of teachers' technology integration practice and their TPCK
Chuang, H., Weng, C., & Huang, F.-C. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.016 · Cited by 55
Kafyulilo, A., Fisser, P., & Voogt, J. M. (2014) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-014-9321-0 · Cited by 50
Anthony, A. B., & Clark, L. M. (2011) · Urban Education · doi:10.1177/0042085911416015 · Cited by 50
Teachers' learning while constructing technology‐based instructional resources
Polly, D. (2011) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01161.x · Cited by 50
Recurrent routines: Analyzing and supporting orchestration in technology-enhanced primary classrooms
Prieto, L. P., Villagrá‐Sobrino, S., Abellán, I. M. J., Martínez‐Monés, A., & Dimitriadis, Y. A. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.001 · Cited by 54
Chinese language teachers’ beliefs about their roles in the Danish context
Wang, L., & Du, X. (2016) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2016.06.009 · Cited by 54
Roblin, N. P., Tondeur, J., Voogt, J. M., Bruggeman, B., Mathieu, G., & van Braak, J. (2018) · Technology Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/1475939x.2017.1414714 · Cited by 50
Yıldırım, B., & Sıdeklı, S. (2018) · Journal of Baltic Science Education · doi:10.33225/jbse/18.17.200 · Cited by 50
Ghorbani, S., Jafari, S. E. M., & Sharifian, F. (2018) · Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability · doi:10.2478/jtes-2018-0002 · Cited by 50
Exploring teachers’ use of technology in teaching and learning mathematics in KwaZulu-Natal schools
Umugiraneza, O., Bansilal, S., & North, D. (2018) · Pythagoras · doi:10.4102/pythagoras.v39i1.342 · Cited by 50
Varying effects of subgoal labeled expository text in programming, chemistry, and statistics
Margulieux, L. E., Catrambone, R., & Schaeffer, L. M. (2018) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-018-9451-7 · Cited by 49
Chaeruman, U. A., Wibawa, B., & Syahrial, Z. (2020) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v14i14.14411 · Cited by 59
Jin, L., XU, Y., Deifell, E., & Angus, K. (2021) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12712 · Cited by 61
A proposed computational thinking teacher development framework for K-12 guided by the TPACK model
Kong, S. C., & Lai, M. (2021) · Journal of Computers in Education · doi:10.1007/s40692-021-00207-7 · Cited by 61
Physical education in a post-COVID world: A blended-gamified approach
Blain, D., Standage, M., & Curran, T. (2022) · European Physical Education Review · doi:10.1177/1356336x221080372 · Cited by 67
Tang, T., Li, P., & Tang, Q. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.767295 · Cited by 49
Artificial Intelligence and Teachers’ New Ethical Obligations
Adams, C., Pente, P., Lemermeyer, G., Turville, J., & Rockwell, G. (2022) · The International Review of Information Ethics · doi:10.29173/irie483 · Cited by 69
Wijaya, T. T., Cao, Y., Bernard, M., Rahmadi, I. F., Lavicza, Z., & Surjono, H. D. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.952549 · Cited by 49
Muslimin, A. I., Mukminatien, N., & Ivone, F. M. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/12921 · Cited by 49
ChatGPT and ELT: Exploring Teachers’ Voices
Mabuan, R. A. (2024) · International Journal of Technology in Education · doi:10.46328/ijte.523 · Cited by 75
Finger, G., Jamieson-Proctor, R., & Albion, P. (2010) · IFIP International Federation for Information Processing/IFIP · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15378-5_11 · Cited by 49
Shelton, C. (2013) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12051 · Cited by 49
Wilson, P. H., Lee, H. S., & Hollebrands, K. F. (2011) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.42.1.0039 · Cited by 49
Shih, C., & Chuang, H. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.021 · Cited by 49
How and what do academics learn through their personal networks
Pataraia, N., Margaryan, A., Falconer, I., & Littlejohn, A. H. (2013) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2013.831041 · Cited by 49
Lux, N. J., Bangert, A. W., & Whittier, D. B. (2011) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.45.4.c · Cited by 49
Şahi̇n, İ., Çelik, İ., Aktürk, A. O., & Aydın, M. (2013) · Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/21532974.2013.10784714 · Cited by 49
Hughes, J. E. (2013) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.48.4.e · Cited by 49
Using Netnography to Explore the Culture of Online Language Teaching Communities
Kulavuz‐Onal, D. (2015) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v32i3.26636 · Cited by 49
Mathematics and science teachers’ pedagogical orientations and their use of ICT in teaching
Law, N. W. Y. (2009) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-009-9094-z · Cited by 49
Personal learning environment: an experience with ESP teacher training
Xu, X., Chan, F. M., & Sun, Y. (2018) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1552872 · Cited by 49
ASLAN, S. A., & Duruhan, K. (2020) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10354-6 · Cited by 78
Mailizar, M., Hidayat, M., & Almanthari, A. (2021) · Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/21532974.2021.1934613 · Cited by 49
Khamis, T., Naseem, A., Khamis, A., & Petrucka, P. M. (2021) · Journal of Work-Applied Management · doi:10.1108/jwam-01-2021-0010 · Cited by 49
Max, A., Lukas, S., & Weitzel, H. (2022) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12674 · Cited by 66
Thohir, M. A., Ahdhianto, E., Mas’ula, S., Yanti, F. A., & Sukarelawan, M. I. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/12918 · Cited by 70
A Critical Examination of the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework
Stoilescu, D. (2015) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633115572285 · Cited by 48
An investigation of the technological pedagogical content knowledge of pre-service teachers
Horzum, M. B. (2013) · Technology Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/1475939x.2013.795079 · Cited by 48
Supporting pre‐service teachers in designing technology‐infused lesson plans
Janssen, N., & Lazonder, A. W. (2016) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12146 · Cited by 48
Modeling the relationship between pre-service teachers’ TPACK and digital nativity
Yurdakul, I. K. (2017) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-017-9546-x · Cited by 48
Chen, Y.-H., & Jang, S. (2018) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633118769442 · Cited by 48
The effects of programming education planned with TPACK framework on learning outcomes
Atun, H., & Usta, E. (2019) · Participatory Educational Research · doi:10.17275/per.19.10.6.2 · Cited by 48
Cui, X., Huo, B., Lei, Y., & Zhou, Q. (2019) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-04-2019-0311 · Cited by 52
Koh, J. H. L. (2020) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12930 · Cited by 48
Lasica, I.-E., Meletiou-Mavrotheris, Μ., & Katzis, K. (2020) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci10040121 · Cited by 52
Gürer, M. D. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10493-4 · Cited by 48
Innovators in Teacher Education
Foulger, T. S., Burke, D., Williams, M. K., Waker, M., Hansen, R., & Slykhuis, D. A. (2013) · Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/21532974.2013.10784722 · Cited by 48
The adoption of mark-up tools in an interactive e-textbook reader
Horne, S. V., Russell, J. M., & Schuh, K. L. (2016) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9425-x · Cited by 53
Developing a Rhetoric of Aesthetics: The (Often) Forgotten Link Between Art and STEM
Mehta, R., Keenan, S. F., Henriksen, D., & Mishra, P. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1_7 · Cited by 47
Self-citationRodríguez, J., Cáceres-Jensen, L., Díaz, T., Ibáñez, S. D., Padilla, V. B., Pernaa, J., & Aksela, M. K. (2020) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/c9rp00273a · Cited by 47
Development and validation of the teachers’ digital learning identity survey
Zimmer, W. K., McTigue, E. M., & Matsuda, N. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101717 · Cited by 51
EĞİTİMCİLER İÇİN DİJİTAL YETERLİLİK ÖLÇEĞİ: UYARLAMA, GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI
TOKER, T., Akgün, E., Cömert, Z., & Edip, S. (2021) · Milli Eğitim Dergisi · doi:10.37669/milliegitim.801607 · Cited by 47
Challenges Faced by Teaching Assistants in Computer Science Education Across Europe
Riese, E., Lorås, M., Ukrop, M., & Effenberger, T. (2021) · ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE) · doi:10.1145/3430665.3456304 · Cited by 57
Predicting the Intention to Use Technology in Education among Student Teachers: A Path Analysis
Luik, P., & Taimalu, M. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11090564 · Cited by 64
Undergraduate Students’ Engagement in Project-Based Learning with an Authentic Context
Chang, Y., Choi, J., & Akbulut, M. Ş. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14020168 · Cited by 47
Graphic Design Education in the Era of Text‐to‐Image Generation: Transitioning to Contents Creator
Hwang, Y., & Wu, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Art & Design Education · doi:10.1111/jade.12558 · Cited by 47
Heine, S., & König, J. (2025) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2025.2540791 · Cited by 59
Las tecnologías para la innovación y la práctica docente
García, C. M. (2013) · Revista Brasileira de Educação · doi:10.1590/s1413-24782013000100003 · Cited by 47
Looi, C., Sun, D., Seow, P., & Chia, G. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.006 · Cited by 52
I like Facebook: Exploring Israeli high school chemistry teachers’ TPACK and self-efficacy beliefs
Blonder, R., & Rap, S. (2015) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-015-9384-6 · Cited by 50
Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2009) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/13803610903444550 · Cited by 47
Interactive digital technologies’ use in Southwest Nigerian universities
Agbatogun, A. O. (2013) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-012-9282-1 · Cited by 47
Moving toward a mobile learning landscape: presenting a mlearning integration framework
Crompton, H. (2017) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-02-2017-0018 · Cited by 57
Young, K., McNamara, P., & Coughlan, B. (2017) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.07.017 · Cited by 47
Rubio, J. C. C., Serrano, J. S., & Bel, J. C. (2018) · Educatio Siglo XXI · doi:10.6018/j/324191 · Cited by 47
Bardaweel, S. A., & Dashash, M. (2018) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-018-0540-4 · Cited by 47
Bohloko, ’., Makatjane, T. J., George, M. J., & Mokuku, T. (2019) · African Journal of Research in Mathematics Science and Technology Education · doi:10.1080/18117295.2019.1593610 · Cited by 56
University Teachers’ Ambivalence about the Digital Transformation of Higher Education
Sjöberg, J., & Lilja, P. (2019) · International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research · doi:10.26803/ijlter.18.13.7 · Cited by 47
Zimmermann, F., Melle, I., & Huwer, J. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01296 · Cited by 47
Digital Teaching in Medical Education: Scientific Literature Landscape Review
Yeung, A. W. K., Parvanov, E. D., Hriberšek, M., Eibensteiner, F., Klager, E., Kletečka-Pulker, M., Rössler, B., Schebesta, K., Willschke, H., Atanasov, A. G., et al. (2022) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/32747 · Cited by 49
How does technology challenge teacher education?
Kaminskienè, L., Järvelä, S., & Lehtinen, E. (2022) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-022-00375-1 · Cited by 105
Schools and Computers: Tales of a Digital Romance
Bigum, C. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2642-0_2 · Cited by 46
Investigating in-service teachers' workplace TPACK development
Phillips, M. (2013) · Australian educational computing · Cited by 46
Paetsch, J., & Drechsel, B. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733830 · Cited by 52
Twenty-First-Century Teacher Competencies and Trends in Teacher Training
Gümüş, A. (2022) · Maarif global education series · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-9640-4_11 · Cited by 70
Li, K., Wijaya, T. T., Chen, X., & Harahap, M. S. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-52604-4 · Cited by 46
Çelik, İ., Kontkanen, S., Laru, J., & Dalyanci, A. A. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105485 · Cited by 56
Technology integration in K-12 science classrooms: An analysis of barriers and implications
Hechter, R. P., & Vermette, L. A. (2013) · Cited by 46
Banister, S., & Reinhart, R. V. (2011) · Computers in the Schools · doi:10.1080/07380569.2011.551086 · Cited by 46
Situated Learning with Online Portfolios, Classroom Websites and Facebook
Shaltry, C., Henriksen, D., Wu, M. L., & Dickson, W. P. (2013) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-013-0658-9 · Cited by 46
Haydn, T. (2014) · Technology Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/1475939x.2014.892898 · Cited by 46
Teachers’ use of digital learning tool for teaching in higher education
Mei, X. Y., Aas, E., & Medgard, M. (2019) · Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/jarhe-10-2018-0202 · Cited by 46
Hu, D., Yuan, B., Luo, J., Wang, M., & |, |. (2021) · Knowledge Management & E-Learning An International Journal · doi:10.34105/j.kmel.2021.13.001 · Cited by 68
An exploratory study of pre-service teachers’ computational thinking and programming skills
Umutlu, D. (2021) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2021.1922105 · Cited by 52
Hu, C., & Fyfe, V. (2010) · ASCILITE Publications · doi:10.14742/apubs.2010.2102 · Cited by 46
Project-, problem-, and inquiry-based learning
Albion, P. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316091968.024 · Cited by 47
When knowing is believing: A multi‐trait analysis of self‐reported TPCK
Krauskopf, K., & Forssell, K. S. (2018) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12253 · Cited by 45
Avsec, S., & Jagiełło-Kowalczyk, M. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13084369 · Cited by 72
Chan, S., Maneewan, S., & Koul, R. (2021) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2021.1947226 · Cited by 58
Analisis Komponen TPACK Guru SD sebagai Kerangka Kompetensi Guru Profesional di Abad 21
Akhwani, A., & Rahayu, D. W. (2021) · Jurnal Basicedu · doi:10.31004/basicedu.v5i4.1119 · Cited by 45
Learning with Immersive Virtual Reality: An Exploratory Study of Chinese College Nursing Students
Wu, J. G., Miller, L., Huang, Q., & Wang, M. (2021) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/00336882211044860 · Cited by 45
Zhang, M., & Chen, S. (2022) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2021.2013396 · Cited by 45
Chen, R., Lee, V. R., & G Lee, M. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13350-w · Cited by 43
TPACK In Situ: A Design-Based Approach Supporting Professional Development in Practice
Pareto, L., & Willermark, S. (2019) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633118783180 · Cited by 43
Nilsson, P. (2024) · Research in Science & Technological Education · doi:10.1080/02635143.2022.2131759 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Venue
- Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1017-1054
- ISSN
- 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 0161-4681
- 1467-9620
- OpenAlex
- W2123184471
- Cited by
- 12,604
- References
- 117
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1812 · 2025: 1418 · 2024: 1168 · 2023: 1182 · 2022: 975 · 2021: 874 · 2020: 715 · 2019: 644 · 2018: 605 · 2017: 509 · 2016: 515 · 2015: 571 · 2014: 395 · 2013: 394 · 2012: 262
- FWCI
- 299.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Keywords
- technological pedagogical content knowledge, TPCK, pedagogical content knowledge, teacher knowledge, technology integration in teaching, teacher professional development, faculty development, higher education, situated knowledge, conceptual framework, educational technology theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review