The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multilevel Modelling of Complex Survey Data
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Multilevel modelling is sometimes used for data from complex surveys involving multistage sampling, unequal sampling probabilities and stratification. We consider generalized linear mixed models and particularly the case of dichotomous responses. A pseudolikelihood approach for accommodating inverse probability weights in multilevel models with an arbitrary number of levels is implemented by using adaptive quadrature. A sandwich estimator is used to obtain standard errors that account for stratification and clustering. When level 1 weights are used that vary between elementary units in clusters, the scaling of the weights becomes important. We point out that not only variance components but also regression coefficients can be severely biased when the response is dichotomous. The pseudolikelihood methodology is applied to complex survey data on reading proficiency from the American sample of the ‘Program for international student assessment’ 2000 study, using the Stata program gllamm which can estimate a wide range of multilevel and latent variable models. Performance of pseudo-maximum-likelihood with different methods for handling level 1 weights is investigated in a Monte Carlo experiment. Pseudo-maximum-likelihood estimators of (conditional) regression coefficients perform well for large cluster sizes but are biased for small cluster sizes. In contrast, estimators of marginal effects perform well in both situations. We conclude that caution must be exercised in pseudo-maximum-likelihood estimation for small cluster sizes when level 1 weights are used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Weighted Likelihood Estimation of Ability in Item Response Theory
Warm, T. A. (1989) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294627 · Cited by 1,216
On the Variances of Asymptotically Normal Estimators from Complex Surveys
Binder, D. A. (1983) · International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique · doi:10.2307/1402588 · Cited by 982
In All Likelihood: Statistical Modelling and Inference Using Likelihood
Pawitan, Y. (2001) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198507659.001.0001 · Cited by 874
Cited by
Stunting and severe stunting among children under-5 years in Nigeria: a multilevel analysis
Akombi, B. J., Agho, K. E., Hall, J. J., Merom, D., Astell-Burt, T., & Renzaho, A. M. N. (2017) · BMC Pediatrics · doi:10.1186/s12887-016-0770-z · Cited by 322
Lee, J.-S. (2012) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2012.04.006 · Cited by 272
Hechavarría, D. M., Terjesen, S. A., Ingram, A. E., Renko, M., Justo, R., & Elam, A. (2017) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9747-4 · Cited by 268
Heeringa, S. G., & Berglund, P. A. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.02.10.942011 · Cited by 247
“Weighted estimation of multi-level models requires a disaggregation and scaling of the individual propensity or population weights for each level of the model (Rabe-Hesketh and Skrondal, 2006).”
BackgroundKiuru, N., Wang, M.-T., Salmela-Aro, K., Kannas, L., Ahonen, T., & Hirvonen, R. (2020) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-019-01184-y · Cited by 235
Metadata
- Authors
- Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-05-16
- Volume
- 169
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 805-827
- ISSN
- 0964-1998 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-985X
- OpenAlex
- W2108849070
- Cited by
- 636
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multilevel Modelling of Complex Survey Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-985x.2006.00426.x
- The paper
- Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2006). Multilevel Modelling of Complex Survey Data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985x.2006.00426.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.