Cited by 323Child Nutrition and Water AccessPublic Health and NutritionGlobal Maternal and Child Health

Stunting and severe stunting among children under-5 years in Nigeria: a multilevel analysis

Open access
Akombi, Blessing Jaka, Agho, Kingsley Emwinyore, Hall, John Joseph, Merom, Dafna, Astell-Burt, Thomas, Renzaho, Andre M. N.·2017·BMC Pediatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stunting has been identified as one of the major proximal risk factors for poor physical and mental development of children under-5 years. Stunting predominantly occurs in the first 1000 days of life (0-23 months) and continues to the age of five. This study examines factors associated with stunting and severe stunting among children under-5 years in Nigeria. METHODS: The sample included 24,529 children aged 0-59 months from the 2013 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS). Height-for-age z-scores (HFAz), generated using the 2006 World Health Organisation (WHO) growth reference, were used to define stunting (HFAz < -2SD) and severe stunting (HFAz < -3SD). Multilevel logistic regression analyses that adjusted for cluster and survey weights were used to determine potential risk factors associated with stunting and severe stunting among children under-5 years in Nigeria. RESULTS: The prevalence of stunting and severe stunting were 29% [95% Confidence interval (Cl): 27.4, 30.8] and 16.4% [95%Cl: 15.1, 17.8], respectively for children aged 0-23 months, and 36.7% [95%Cl: 35.1, 38.3] and 21% [95%Cl: 19.7, 22.4], respectively for children aged 0-59 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that the most consistent significant risk factors for stunting and severe stunting among children aged 0-23 months and 0-59 months are: sex of child (male), mother's perceived birth size (small and average), household wealth index (poor and poorest households), duration of breastfeeding (more than 12 months), geopolitical zone (North East, North West, North Central) and children who were reported to having had diarrhoea in the 2 weeks prior to the survey [Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for stunted children 0-23 months = 1.22 (95%Cl: 0.99, 1.49)];[AOR for stunted children 0-59 months = 1.31 (95%Cl: 1.16, 1.49)], [AOR for severely stunted children 0-23 months = 1.31 (95%Cl: 1.03, 1.67)]; [AOR for severely stunted children 0-59 months = 1.58 (95%Cl: 1.38, 1.82)]. CONCLUSIONS: In order to meet the post-2015 sustainable development goals, policy interventions to reduce stunting in Nigeria should focus on poverty alleviation as well as improving women's nutrition, child feeding practices and household sanitation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12887-016-0770-z

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maternal or household access to clean water significantly reduced the risk of under-five mortality, child stunting, schistosomiasis, and hookworm infections.

    “Concretely, studies showed that maternal, or household access to clean water significantly reduced the risk of under-five mortality (Ahmed et al., 2016;Acheampong et al., 2017Acheampong et al., , 2018)), child stunting (Akombi et al., 2017;Vos et al., 2017;Marinda et al., 2018), schistosomiasis (Atalabi et al., 2016;Donohue et al., 2017), and hookworm infections (Baker et al., 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akombi, B. J., Agho, K. E., Hall, J. J., Merom, D., Astell-Burt, T., & Renzaho, A. M. N.
Affiliations
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Venue
BMC Pediatrics
Published
2017-01-13
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
15-15
ISSN
1471-2431 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2575304420
Cited by
322
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6
FWCI
16.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Western Sydney University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Public Health and Nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
child stunting, severe stunting, children under five, risk factors for stunting, breastfeeding duration, diarrhea, household wealth, sex of child, Nigeria, height-for-age z-score, first 1000 days, under-five malnutrition, geopolitical zones, multilevel analysis
MeSH terms
Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Growth Disorders, Health Surveys, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Nigeria, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Prevalence, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review