CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 167Team Dynamics and PerformanceSocial and Intergroup PsychologyInterprofessional Education and Collaboration

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 97 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Silos and Social Identity: The Social Identity Approach as a Framework for Understanding and Overcoming Divisions in Health Care

Open access
KREINDLER, SARA A., DOWD, DAMIEN A., DANA STAR, NOAH, GOTTSCHALK, TANIA·2012·The Milbank Quarterly
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00666.xPMC PMC3460209
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Context: One of health care's foremost challenges is the achievement of integration and collaboration among the groups providing care. Yet this fundamentally group‐related issue is typically discussed in terms of interpersonal relations or operational issues, not group processes. Methods: We conducted a systematic search for literature offering a group‐based analysis and examined it through the lens of the social identity approach (SIA). Founded in the insight that group memberships form an important part of the self‐concept, the SIA encompasses five dimensions: social identity, social structure, identity content, strength of identification, and context. Findings: Our search yielded 348 reports, 114 of which cited social identity. However, SIA‐citing reports varied in both compatibility with the SIA's metatheoretical paradigm and applied relevance to health care; conversely, some non‐SIA‐citers offered SIA‐congruent analyses. We analyzed the various combinations and interpretations of the five SIA dimensions, identifying ten major conceptual currents. Examining these in the light of the SIA yielded a cohesive, multifaceted picture of (inter)group relations in health care. Conclusions: The SIA offers a coherent framework for integrating a diverse, far‐flung literature on health care groups. Further research should take advantage of the full depth and complexity of the approach, remain sensitive to the unique features of the health care context, and devote particular attention to identity mobilization and context change as key drivers of system transformation. Our article concludes with a set of “guiding questions” to help health care leaders recognize the group dimension of organizational problems, identify mechanisms for change, and move forward by working with and through social identities, not against them.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00666.x

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 97 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Fournier V., 2002, Managing Professional Identities: Knowledge, Performativity and the “New” Professional, 115
  2. Graham A., 2001, Optimising Value: The Motivation of Doctors and Managers in the NHS
  3. Kirkpatrick I., 2007, National Inquiry into Management and Medicine
  4. Kreindler S.A., 2008, (Medical) Home Is Where the Heart Is (Rapid Review)
  5. Light D.W., 1988, Turf Battles and the Theory of Professional Dominance, Research in the Sociology of Health Care, 7, 203
  6. McDonald K.M., 2007, Care Coordination
  7. Oandasan I., 2006, Teamwork in Healthcare: Promoting Effective Teamwork in Healthcare in Canada
  8. Schaeffer P., 2011, Berwick: U.S. Ripe for Health Care Delivery Improvements, Catholic Health World, 27, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
KREINDLER, S. A., DOWD, D. A., DANA STAR, N., & GOTTSCHALK, T.
Affiliations
  • Winnipeg Regional Health Authority (CA)
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
Corresponding author
KREINDLER, SARA A.
ORCID
Venue
The Milbank Quarterly
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-06
Volume
90
Issue
2
Pages
347-374
ISSN
  • 0887-378X (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-0009
DOI
10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00666.x
PMC
PMC3460209
OpenAlex
W1841892384
Cited by
167
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 17 d)
Locations
  • Milbank Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Keywords
social identity approach, integrated care, intergroup relations, group membership, social identity, health care organization, organizational change, identity mobilization, health care collaboration, healthcare leadership
MeSH terms
Cooperative Behavior, Delivery of Health Care, Health Personnel, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Social Identification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review