The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Agency, Simulation and Self‐identification
Abstract
Abstract: This paper is concerned with the problem of self‐identification in the domain of action. We claim that this problem can arise not just for the self as object, but also for the self as subject in the ascription of agency. We discuss and evaluate some proposals concerning the mechanisms involved in self‐identification and in agency‐ascription, and their possible impairments in pathological cases. We argue in favor of a simulation hypothesis that claims that actions, whether overt or covert, are centrally simulated by the neural network, and that this simulation provides the basis for action recognition and attribution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind
Searle, J. R. (1983) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173452 · Cited by 4,575
Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see
Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35784 · Cited by 4,410
Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study
di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00230027 · Cited by 3,539
Das Reafferenzprinzip: Wechselwirkungen zwischen Zentralnervensystem und Peripherie
von Holst, E., & Mittelstaedt, H. (1950) · Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/bf00622503 · Cited by 2,655
Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition.
Jeannerod, M. (2001) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0832 · Cited by 2,563
Self-citationMotor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study
Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (1995) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1995.73.6.2608 · Cited by 2,297
The cognitive neuropsychology of schizophrenia
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-0601 · Cited by 1,901
Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion
Sperry, R. W. (1950) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0055479 · Cited by 1,789
Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1997) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7289.001.0001 · Cited by 1,479
Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors
(1996) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1996.0058 · Cited by 1,246
Cited by
Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency
Synofzik, M., Vosgerau, G., & Newen, A. (2008) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.03.010 · Cited by 1,050
Jackson, P. L., Brunet, E., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2006) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.015 · Cited by 838
Direct perception in the intersubjective context
Gallagher, S. (2008) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.003 · Cited by 658
The phenomenology of action: a conceptual framework
Pacherie, E. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.003 · Cited by 618
Allen, P., Larøi, F., McGuire, P. K., & Aleman, A. (2008) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.07.012 · Cited by 579
Metadata
- Authors
- Jeannerod, M., & Pacherie, E.
- Venue
- Mind & Language
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-03-16
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-146
- ISSN
- 0268-1064 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0017
- OpenAlex
- W2165564615
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 9.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Agency, Simulation and Self‐identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2004.00251.x
- The paper
- Jeannerod, M., & Pacherie, E. (2004). Agency, Simulation and Self‐identification. Mind & Language. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2004.00251.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
