Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 248

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive function in early Parkinson’s disease: a population‐based study

Elgh, E., Domellöf, M., Linder, J., Edström, M., Stenlund, H., Forsgren, L.·2009·European Journal of Neurology

Abstract

Background and purpose: The study aims to describe the frequency, pattern and determinants of cognitive function in patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson’s disease (PD); to compare patients with impaired cognition to patients with intact cognition; and to compare to matched healthy controls. Methods: Patients were identified in a longitudinal population based study of idiopathic non‐drug induced parkinsonism. Eighty‐eight newly diagnosed patients with PD and no dementia were included during a four year period. The patients and 30 age‐ and sex‐matched healthy control subjects underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. Results: Patients performed significantly worse than healthy controls in a majority of neuropsychological tests. Test results in attention, psychomotor function, episodic memory (free recall), executive function and category fluency were significantly lower in the patient group. Comparison with normative data revealed that 30% of the patients had deficits in ≥1 cognitive domain (episodic memory, executive function and verbal function). Seventy per cent of the patients had normal performance. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III sub scores; speech, facial expression, rigidity and bradykinesia were significantly higher, and disease duration shorter amongst the cognitively impaired than amongst the cognitively intact patients. Tremor showed no difference. Education level was an independent predictor of dysfunction in patients with ≥2 cognitive domains affected. Conclusion: Cognitive dysfunction is common in untreated patients in early PD, affecting attention, psychomotor function, episodic memory, executive function and category fluency. Education level was an independent predictor of severe cognitive dysfunction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02707.x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 248

Metadata

Authors
Elgh, E., Domellöf, M., Linder, J., Edström, M., Stenlund, H., & Forsgren, L.
Venue
European Journal of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-11-17
Volume
16
Issue
12
Pages
1278-1284
ISSN
  • 1351-5101 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-1331
OpenAlex
W1545877169
Cited by
248
References
7
FWCI
10.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive function in early Parkinson’s disease: a population‐based study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02707.x
The paper
Elgh, E., Domellöf, M., Linder, J., Edström, M., Stenlund, H., & Forsgren, L. (2009). Cognitive function in early Parkinson’s disease: a population‐based study. European Journal of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02707.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.