The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organizational learning and knowledge in public service organizations: A systematic review of the literature
Abstract
This paper is a systematic review of the literature on organizational learning and knowledge with relevance to public service organizations. Organizational learning and knowledge are important to public sector organizations, which share complex external challenges with private organizations, but have different drivers and goals for knowledge. The evidence shows that the concepts of organizational learning and knowledge are under‐researched in relation to the public sector and, importantly, this raises wider questions about the extent to which context is taken into consideration in terms of learning and knowledge more generally across all sectors. A dynamic model of organizational learning within and across organizational boundaries is developed that depends on four sets of factors: features of the source organization; features of the recipient organization; the characteristics of the relationship between organizations; and the environmental context. The review concludes, first, that defining ‘organization’ is an important element of understanding organizational learning and knowledge. Second, public organizations constitute an important, distinctive context for the study of organizational learning and knowledge. Third, there continues to be an over‐reliance on the private sector as the principal source of theoretical understanding and empirical research and this is conceptually limiting for the understanding of organizational learning and knowledge. Fourth, differences as well as similarities between organizational sectors require conceptualization and research that acknowledge sector‐specific aims, values and structures. Finally, it is concluded that frameworks for explaining processes of organizational learning at different levels need to be sufficiently dynamic and complex to accommodate public organizations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The review used backward and forward citation tracking of the most influential papers to broaden the search.
“By searching by hand and citation tracking (Nabi et al. 2017; Rashman et al. 2009), we examined the backward and forward citations of the most influential papers.”
From Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time (2022) · cites this paper as Rashman et al. 2009
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809 · cited 11×
“Some influential authors have argued that knowledge creation is more dynamic than organizational learning because it includes the development of the organization’s cognitive resources (Nonaka 1994).”
BackgroundInfluentialToward a knowledge-based theory of the firm
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171110 · Cited by 16,157
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113 · cited 1×
“Popularizing influences include: Argyris and Schön’s (1978) theory of action which distinguishes the defensive, non-learning routines of Model 1 behaviour from that of Model 2 individual, collective and ‘doubleloop learning’; and Nonaka’s (1994) contribution to debates about knowledge conversion of tacit and explicit…”
BackgroundInterorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations
GREENHALGH, T., ROBERT, G., MACFARLANE, F., BATE, P., & KYRIAKIDOU, O. (2004) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.0887-378x.2004.00325.x · Cited by 7,448
Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms
Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2893 · Cited by 4,164 · cited 2×
“The basis of ‘advantage’ to ‘the firm’ is the internal embedding of knowledge and the prevention of knowledge transfer to competitors (Argote and Ingram 2000): even motivation for co-operative learning relationships is usually economic, aimed at overcoming rivals in chosen markets (Child and Faulkner 1998).”
BackgroundNetworking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence
Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00101.x · Cited by 1,747
Knowledge Management Processes and International Joint Ventures
Inkpen, A. C., & Dinur, A. (1998) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.9.4.454 · Cited by 993
Organizational Learning: Diverging Communities of Practice?
Easterby-Smith, M., Snell, R., & Gherardi, S. (1998) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/1350507698293001 · Cited by 302 · cited 2×
“Easterby-Smith et al. (1998) depict this variety as signifying two endemic problems in the field of organizational learning: confusion and over- simplification.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 156
- 10.1177/1350507698293004 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.36.2.140 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.49.4.571.14424 · DOI
- Audit Commission, 2007, The Transition from CPA to CAA
- 10.1080/1478336032000046661 · DOI
- 10.1177/1350507604048270 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-9299.00322 · DOI
- Baum J.A.C., 1999, Sources, dynamics, and speed: a longitudinal behavioural simulation of inter‐organizational and population‐level learning, Advances in Strategic Management, 16, 155
- 10.1108/09696470010316260 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-9302.00204 · DOI
- Benington J., 2001, Local Partnerships and Social Exclusion in the European Union, 198
- Benington J., Debating and Delivering Public Value
- 10.1002/smj.4250171111 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00470.x · DOI
- 10.1177/017084069501600605 · DOI · Paper page
- Boaz A., 1999, Attitudes and Aspirations of Older People: Reviews of the Literature. Social Security Report no 101
- 10.1093/jopart/mug027 · DOI
- Bozeman B., 1994, The ‘Publicness Puzzle’ in organization theory: a test of alternative explanations of differences between public and private organizations, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4, 197
- 10.1177/002085239806400107 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.2.1.40 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.12.2.198.10116 · DOI
- Cabinet Office, 2006, The UK Government's Approach to Public Service Reform – A Discussion Paper
- 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2004.00341.x · DOI
- Child and Faulkner, 1998, Strategies of Co‐operation: Managing Alliances, Networks and Joint Ventures, 10.1093/oso/9780198774846.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1177/1350507605049906 · DOI
- 10.2307/2393553 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1467-6486.00208 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1040.0075 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.342 · DOI
- 10.2307/259140 · DOI · Paper page
- Cyert R., 1963, A Behavioural Theory of the Firm
- Daft R., 1984, Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems, Academy of Management Review, 3, 546
- 10.1006/obhd.2000.2885 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-9302.00144 · DOI
- DeFillippi R., 2005, Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, 19
- 10.1093/jopart/muh014 · DOI
- Dewey J., 1916, Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education
- 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1996.tb00806.x · DOI
- Dixon N., 2000, Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know
- 10.1177/017084069301400303 · DOI
- 10.1080/1471903042000303328 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<345::AID-SMJ96>3.0.CO;2-N · DOI
- Easterby‐Smith M., 2005, Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management
- Easterby‐Smith M., 1999, Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization: Developments in Theory and in Practice, 10.4135/9781446218297 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.13.2.128.530 · DOI
- Elkjaer B., 2005, Handbook of Organizational Learning And Knowledge Management, 38
- 10.1177/1350507604048272 · DOI
- 10.5465/AMJ.2005.15993150 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2003.00389.x · DOI
- Finger and Brand, 1999, Developments in Theory and Practice, 130
- 10.2307/258048 · DOI
- 10.3406/bude.1972.3176 · DOI
- 10.1177/1363459303007003003 · DOI
- Geiger D. Koch J.andKliesch M.(2005).Power/knowledge structures in organizations – between enabling and suppression. Paper presented at the Sixth European Conference on Organizational Knowledge Learning and Capabilities Boston.
- Gherardi S., 2006, Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning
- 10.1177/1350507698293002 · DOI
- 10.1108/09696470410538206 · DOI
- 10.1108/09696470510599154 · DOI
- 10.1086/225469 · DOI · Paper page
- Gray A., 2005, Editorial: the state of public management: improvement and innovation, Public Money & Management, 25, 7
- 10.1111/1467-6486.00342 · DOI · Paper page
- Hartley J., 2006, Innovation and Its Contribution to Improvement: A Literature Review for Policy‐Makers, Policy Advisors, Managers and Academics
- Hartley J., 2008, Managing to Improve Public Services, 197
- 10.1080/14616670110117332 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9302.2006.00508.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00652.x · DOI
- Hartley J., 2007, Managing Change in the Public Services, 173
- Hartley J., 2008, Managing to Improve Public Services, 3
- Hayek F.A., 1945, The use of knowledge in society, American Economic Review, 35, 519
- 10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00463.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0018726706062731 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1030.0056 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4135/9781446218297.n4 · DOI
- Inkpen A., 2002, Co‐operative Strategies and Alliances, 267
- 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1995.tb00790.x · DOI
- 10.2307/41165879 · DOI
- Janis I., 1977, Decision‐making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice and Commitment
- 10.1002/kpm.217 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5465/AMJ.2005.19573099 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.9.4.506 · DOI
- 10.1177/1350507698294002 · DOI
- 10.1177/0018726702554003 · DOI
- 10.1177/0018726705053427 · DOI
- 10.1332/030557398782213638 · DOI
- Kolb D.A., 1984, Experiential Learning; Experience as the Source of Learning and Development
- Kolb D.A., 1975, Theories of Group Processes
- 10.1177/0170840600213001 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19:5<461::AID-SMJ953>3.0.CO;2-L · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5465/AMR.2005.15281451 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.14.6.633.24866 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/smj.4250141009 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535 · DOI
- 10.1108/09696470510592494 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199904)20:4<317::AID-SMJ28>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
- Lyles M., 2005, Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, 639
- 10.1080/1471903042000256565 · DOI
- Marquand D., 2004, The Decline of the Public
- 10.1080/03003930500293427 · DOI
- 10.1177/014920639602200305 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.7.1.88 · DOI
- Mintzberg H., 1979, The Structuring of Organisations
- Moore M., 1995, Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government
- Moore M., 2005, Break‐through innovations and continuous improvement: two different models of innovative processes in the public sector, Public Money and Management, 25, 43
- 10.1002/smj.4250171108 · DOI
- 10.1177/1350507604048273 · DOI
- Nelson R.R, 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change
- Newell S., 2002, Managing Knowledge Work
- 10.1258/095148403762539095 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781446220511 · DOI
- Newman J., 2000, Innovation and Best Practice in Local Government: A Research Report
- 10.1177/001872679504800701 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00219.x · DOI
- Nonaka I., 1995, The Knowledge‐creating Company, 10.1093/oso/9780195092691.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2001.00834.x · DOI
- Nutley S., 2002, Learning from the Diffusion of Innovations
- 10.1111/1467-8551.00379 · DOI
- Penrose E.T., 1959, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm
- 10.5465/amj.2005.19573101 · DOI
- Pettigrew A.M., 1992, Shaping Strategic Change: Making Change in Large Organizations
- Polanyi M., 1958, The Study of Man
- Polanyi M., 1967, The Tacit Dimension
- 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00626.x · DOI
- 10.1177/1350507600312003 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781446218297.n2 · DOI
- Rashman L., 2007, Capacity Building Through the Beacon Scheme
- 10.1111/1467-9299.00316 · DOI
- Rashman L., 2005, Learning to improve: approaches to improving local government services, Public Money and Management, 25, 19
- 10.2307/3556658 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0366 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-9299.00257 · DOI
- Scarbrough H., 2005, Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, 495
- 10.1080/07421222.2000.11045648 · DOI
- 10.1177/0013161X99351007 · DOI
- Senge P., 1990, The leader's new work: building learning organizations, Sloan Management Review, 32, 7
- 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00129.x · DOI
- 10.2307/41166146 · DOI
- 10.1108/09696470310497159 · DOI
- Stacey R., 2005, Experiencing Emergence in Organizations: Local Interaction and the Emergence of Global Patterns, 10.4324/9780203696958 · DOI
- Storck J., 2000, Knowledge diffusion through strategic communities, Sloan Management Review, 41, 63
- 10.1287/orsc.12.3.331.10105 · DOI
- Tranfield D., 2002, Undertaking Research: Developing an Evidence‐Based Approach for Management Research
- 10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/orsc.13.2.179.536 · DOI
- Tsoukas H., 2005, Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, 410
- 10.1111/1467-6486.00268 · DOI
- Turner D., 2006, Public Service Improvement, 627
- Van den Bosch F., 2005, Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, 278
- Vera D., 2005, Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, 12
- 10.1111/1467-9302.00200 · DOI
- 10.1080/03003930008433975 · DOI
- 10.1177/1350507604043022 · DOI
- Weick K., 1996, The role of renewal in organizational learning, International Journal of Technology Management, 11, 738
- 10.1177/135050840072003 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lean implementation within SMEs: a literature review
Hu, Q., Mason, R., Williams, S. J., & Found, P. (2015) · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · doi:10.1108/jmtm-02-2014-0013 · Cited by 275
Dynamic Capabilities in Public Organizations: A literature review and research agenda
Piening, E. P. (2013) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.708358 · Cited by 270
Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time
Cabiddu, F., Moi, L., Patriotta, G., & Allen, D. G. (2022) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2022.06.001 · Cited by 138
Liu, J., Ma, Y., Appolloni, A., & Cheng, W. (2021) · Journal of Public Procurement · doi:10.1108/jopp-04-2020-0035 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Rashman, L., Withers, E., & Hartley, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Management Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-10-26
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 463-494
- ISSN
- 1460-8545
- 1468-2370
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 10
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review