The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Role of Cognitive Styles in Business and Management: Reviewing 40 Years of Research
Open accessAbstract
In line with increased attention on the application of cognitive approaches to industrial, work and organizational psychology, the last 40 years have witnessed a growing interest in application of the cognitive style construct to the field of business and management. The purpose of this paper is threefold. First, we wish to advance understanding of cognitive styles research by elucidating trends and perspectives related to business and management. Second, we identify gaps in the literature and promising areas of research that can be further developed. This is accomplished by means of a review of papers published between 1969 and 2009. Eight themes emerged from our analysis: (a) vocational and occupational issues; (b) national culture; (c) teamwork and interpersonal relationships; (d) learning; (e) decision making; (f) creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship; (g) sales and marketing; and (h) management information systems, information management and use. Third, we identify valid and reliable methods of assessment of cognitive style for use in business and management settings. Finally we draw a number of conclusions regarding the current state of cognitive styles research and promising directions for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116 · Cited by 5,359
Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition.
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.2.291 · Cited by 4,263
Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious
Epstein, S. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.8.709 · Cited by 2,883
Learning Styles and Pedagogy in post-16 learning: a systematic and critical review
Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004) · Newcastle University · doi:10.25405/ncl.34085991 · Cited by 1,810
The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Bachrach, D. G., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2005) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.454 · Cited by 912 · cited 1×
“Our review was limited to peer-reviewed journal papers on the basis that they represent scientifically validated knowledge and have the highest impact on the field (Podsakoff et al. 2005).”
Kozhevnikov, M. (2007) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.3.464 · Cited by 807
Framing effects: An analytic–holistic perspective
McElroy, T., & Seta, J. J. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1031(03)00036-2 · Cited by 221
Person-Job Cognitive Style Fit for Software Developers: The Effect on Strain and Performance
CHILTON, M. A., HARDGRAVE, B. C., & ARMSTRONG, D. J. (2005) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2005.11045849 · Cited by 138
Cited by
Work curiosity: A new lens for understanding employee creativity
Chang, Y.-Y., & Shih, H.-Y. (2019) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.10.005 · Cited by 88
Paradoxes and Dual Processes: A Review and Synthesis
Keller, J., & Sadler‐Smith, E. (2019) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12200 · Cited by 66
Self-citationHuman-centered artificial intelligence: a field experiment
Krakowski, S., Haftor, D., Luger, J., Pashkevich, N., & Raisch, S. (2026) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.03849 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Armstrong, S. J., Cools, E., & Sadler‐Smith, E.
- Venue
- International Journal of Management Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-06-15
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 238-262
- ISSN
- 1460-8545 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2370
- OpenAlex
- W1568108542
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 15.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of Cognitive Styles in Business and Management: Reviewing 40 Years of Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00315.x
- The paper
- Armstrong, S. J., Cools, E., & Sadler‐Smith, E. (2012). Role of Cognitive Styles in Business and Management: Reviewing 40 Years of Research. International Journal of Management Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00315.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.