The DOI matches its Crossref record.
SCALES FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF INNOVATIVENESS
Abstract
This paper reports the results of the development of a self-report measure of innovativeness. The utility of such an instrument in human communication research is discussed, together with issues relating to its reliability, validity, and association with social desirability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.9.2.204 · Cited by 3,575
Entrepreneurial Orientation, Learning Orientation, and Firm Performance
Wang, C. L. (2008) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00246.x · Cited by 1,056
Toward a multi‐dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior
Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001) · Journal of Intellectual Capital · doi:10.1108/eum0000000005660 · Cited by 589
The adoption of information technology in the sales force
Schillewaert, N., Ahearne, M. J., Frambach, R. T., & Moenaert, R. K. (2005) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.09.013 · Cited by 362
User acceptance of agile information systems: a model and empirical test
Hong, W., Thong, J. Y. L., Chasalow, L. C., & Dhillon, G. (2011) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222280108 · Cited by 212
Psychological factors influencing technology adoption: A case study from the oil and gas industry
Roberts, R., Flin, R., Millar, D., & Corradi, L. (2021) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102219 · Cited by 121
Clinton-McHarg, T., Yoong, S. L., Tzelepis, F., Regan, T., Fielding, A., Skelton, E., Kingsland, M., Ooi, J. Y., & Wolfenden, L. (2016) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0512-5 · Cited by 116
Guerola-Navarro, V., Oltra-Badenes, R., Gil-Gomez, H., & Gil-Gomez, J. A. (2021) · Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja · doi:10.1080/1331677x.2020.1836992 · Cited by 85
Ketelaar, P. E., & van Balen, M. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.034 · Cited by 85
Sustainable innovation in public procurement: the decisive role of the individual
Eikelboom, M. E., Gelderman, C., & Semeijn, J. (2018) · Journal of Public Procurement · doi:10.1108/jopp-09-2018-012 · Cited by 34
ARAM: A Technology Acceptance Model to Ascertain the Behavioural Intention to Use Augmented Reality
Marto, A., Gonçalves, A., Melo, M., Bessa, M., & Silva, R. (2023) · Journal of Imaging · doi:10.3390/jimaging9030073 · Cited by 31
KURT, A. A., TELLİ, E., BARDAKCI, S., SARSAR, F., ORHAN GÖKSÜN, D., & FİLİZ, O. (2022) · Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International · doi:10.18039/ajesi.1014101 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- HURT, H. T., JOSEPH, K., & COOK, C. D.
- Venue
- Human Communication Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1977-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 58-65
- ISSN
- 0360-3989 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2034103218
- Cited by
- 1,024
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
