Affordances and the Body: An Intentional Analysis of Gibson's Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The paper's approach aligns with Tillas' discussion of 'unintentionally perceived' affordances rather than Heft's view that affordances are directly tied to intentional action.
“We depart from Heft's (Heft, 1989 ) view here, wherein affordances are directly tied to intentional action. Our approach rather aligns with Tillas' (Tillas et al., 2017) discussion of 'unintentionally perceived' affordances, as in the way an infant might learn about the physical support afforded by their bed partly by unintentionally extending their limbs beyond the bed frame.”
From Understanding Agent Complexity Through Affordances (2025) · cites this paper as Heft, 1989
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935 · see citing works
Perceptual learning: Differentiation or enrichment?
Gibson, J. J., & Gibson, E. J. (1955) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0048826 · Cited by 993 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Towards Continual Reinforcement Learning: A Review and Perspectives
Khetarpal, K., Riemer, M., Rish, I., & Precup, D. (2022) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.13673 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
The History and Philosophy of Ecological Psychology
Lobo, L., Heras-Escribano, M., & Travieso, D. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02228 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
The Learning Spiral: A Process Perspective on Paradox
Raisch, S., Hargrave, T. J., & van de Ven, A. H. (2018) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12397 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Jones, R. A. (2017) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312717704722 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Can Affordances Explain Behavior?
Tillas, A., Vosgerau, G., Seuchter, T., & Caiani, S. Z. (2017) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-016-0310-7 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Productive pluralism: The coming of age of ecological psychology.
Bruineberg, J., Withagen, R., & van Dijk, L. (2024) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000438 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Understanding Agent Complexity Through Affordances
Baker, B., & Roberts, S. (2025) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-025-09748-7
“We depart from Heft’s (Heft, 1989 ) view here, wherein affordances are directly tied to intentional action.”
- Authors
- HEFT, H.
- Corresponding author
- HEFT, HARRY
- ORCID
- HEFT, HARRY
- Venue
- Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-03
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-30
- ISSN
- 0021-8308 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-5914
- OpenAlex
- W2077214329
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 16.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Keywords
- affordances, ecological psychology, James Gibson, visual perception, intentional analysis, body and perception, perception-action coupling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review