Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 216

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Compulsory Citizenship Behavior: Theorizing Some Dark Sides of the Good Soldier Syndrome in Organizations.

VIGODA‐GADOT, ERAN·2006·Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour

Abstract

Expressions of good citizenship are a fascinating field for social behavior research. Good citizenship behavior represents the willingness of individuals to invest effort and energy in their social environment beyond any formal requirement and with

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2006.00297.x

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Bies R.J., 2000, Advances in organizational behavior
  2. 10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.922 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.310 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.845 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1037/0021-9010.74.1.157 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.2307/3152222 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Schein E.H., 1961, Coercive persuasion
  8. Van Dyne L., 1995, Extra‐role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity, Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, 215
  9. 10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1068 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
VIGODA‐GADOT, E.
Venue
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-03
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
77-93
ISSN
  • 0021-8308
  • 1468-5914
Cited by
216
References
62
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.