Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recognition of own‐race and other‐race faces by three‐month‐old infants

Open access
Sangrigoli, Sandy, De Schonen, Scania·2004·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: People are better at recognizing faces of their own race than faces of another race. Such race specificity may be due to differential expertise in the two races. Method: In order to find out whether this other‐race effect develops as early as face‐recognition skills or whether it is a long‐term effect of acquired expertise, we tested face recognition in 3‐month‐old Caucasian infants by conducting two experiments using Caucasian and Asiatic faces and a visual pair‐comparison task. We hypothesized that if the other race effect develops together with face processing skills during the first months of life, the ability to recognize own‐race faces will be greater than the ability to recognize other‐race faces: 3‐month‐old Caucasian infants should be better at recognizing Caucasian faces than Asiatic faces. If, on the contrary, the other‐race effect is the long‐term result of acquired expertise, no difference between recognizing own‐ and other‐race faces will be observed at that age. Results: In Experiment 1, Caucasian infants were habituated to a single face. Recognition was assessed by a novelty preference paradigm. The infants’ recognition performance was better for Caucasian than for Asiatic faces. In Experiment 2, Caucasian infants were familiarized with three individual faces. Recognition was demonstrated with both Caucasian and Asiatic faces. Conclusions: These results suggest that (i) the representation of face information by 3‐month‐olds may be race‐experience‐dependent (Experiment 1), and (ii) short‐term familiarization with exemplars of another race group is sufficient to reduce the other‐race effect and to extend the power of face processing (Experiment 2).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00319.x

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Cited by

See all 273

Metadata

Authors
Sangrigoli, S., & De Schonen, S.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-08-27
Volume
45
Issue
7
Pages
1219-1227
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W1979410220
Cited by
273
References
60
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recognition of own‐race and other‐race faces by three‐month‐old infants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00319.x
The paper
Sangrigoli, S., & De Schonen, S. (2004). Recognition of own‐race and other‐race faces by three‐month‐old infants. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00319.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.