Cited by 80Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAttachment and Relationship DynamicsFamily Dynamics and Relationships

Assessing children's appraisals of security in the family system: the development of the Security in the Family System (SIFS) scales

Forman, Evan M., Davies, Patrick T.·2005·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Although delineating the processes by which children appraise the family as a source of security from their collective experiences in the family subsystem has assumed center stage in many conceptualizations of child development, the dearth of measures of child adaptation in the family system has hindered empirical advances. Therefore, this study introduced and tested the psychometric properties of the Security in the Family System (SIFS) scales, a new measure designed to assess children's appraisals of security in their family as a whole. Methods: The SIFS was administered to 853 10–15‐year‐old schoolchildren and readministered to a smaller subsample two weeks later. Additional data was gathered from children, caregivers and teachers using a variety of instruments tapping family instability, cohesion, and conflict; parenting warmth and psychological control; child externalizing and internalizing symptoms; parent–child and interparental insecurity; and children's reactions to conflict simulations. Results: Consistent with models of emotional security in the family, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded three reliable (i.e., good internal consistency, test–retest reliability) dimensions of family security: Preoccupation, Security, and Disengagement. Concurrent and prospective associations between the SIFS scales and measures of family functioning, children's psychological problems, and insecurity in specific family relationships supported the validity of the SIFS. Support for the discriminant validity of the SIFS was evidenced by its specific patterns of relations with children's psychological problems and ability to predict psychological problems after controlling for insecurity in specific family subsystems. Conclusions: Results indicate that the SIFS is a psychometrically sound tool capable of advancing family process models, and that family security is a viable construct whose factors parallel already‐identified patterns of children's security in other family relationships.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00385.x

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Forman, E. M., & Davies, P. T.
Affiliations
  • Drexel University (US)
  • University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
Forman, Evan M.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-03-08
Volume
46
Issue
8
Pages
900-916
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2126278224
Cited by
80
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
family security, scale development, psychometric properties, family functioning, family cohesion, family conflict, parental warmth, psychological control, emotional safety
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attitude, Child, Psychology, Child, Conflict, Psychological, Family, Family Relations, Female, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Parenting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review