Cited by 137Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Treatment and AccessMental Health Research Topics

The Nordic advantage in child mental health: separating health differences from reporting style in a cross‐cultural comparison of psychopathology

Open access
Heiervang, Einar, Goodman, Anna, Goodman, Robert·2008·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: The use of similar standardised measures of psychopathology for population surveys permits cross‐cultural comparisons. However, interpretation of findings can be challenging because rating thresholds may differ across cultures. By combining questionnaire and interview data, we explore whether lower questionnaire scores in Norway as compared to Britain reflect genuine differences in child mental health, or simply different reporting thresholds. Methods: Information from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and the Development and Well‐Being Assessment (DAWBA) interview were compared across recent population surveys in Norway and Britain. The Norwegian study (2002–03) had questionnaire data for 6,658 and interview data for 1,024 8–10‐year‐old children. The British dataset included questionnaire and interview data for 4,898 children of the same age range from two independent surveys (1999 and 2004). Results: Norwegian children had lower SDQ scores on all problem scales (emotional, behavioural, hyperactive and peer relationship) according to parents as well as teachers. DAWBA information showed that the Norwegian prevalence of externalising disorders (behavioural and hyperactivity) was about half that found in Britain, whereas rates of emotional disorders were similar. Norwegian and British children with non‐emotional disorders had similar questionnaire scores and rates of problem‐recognition by parents and teachers. By contrast, questionnaire scores and problem‐recognition were all lower in Norwegian children with emotional disorders. Conclusions: Lower Norwegian questionnaire scores for externalising problems appear to reflect real and substantial differences between the two countries. By contrast, lower questionnaire scores for emotional problems seem to reflect under‐reporting/under‐recognition by Norwegian adults, and not a genuinely lower prevalence of emotional disorders. This illustrates that cross‐cultural differences in psychopathology based only on questionnaire data may be misleading. Nevertheless, careful use of questionnaire and interview data can focus mental health research on cross‐cultural variations likely to reflect genuine health differences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01882.x

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adverse childhood experiences, such as psychological and physical abuse and neglect, parental substance abuse and mental illness, all increase the risk of both physical and mental health problems, as well as health risk behaviours.

    “Adverse childhood experiences, such as psychological and physical abuse and neglect, parental substance abuse and mental illness, all increase the risk of both physical and mental health problems, as well as health risk behaviours [36-41].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heiervang, E., Goodman, A., & Goodman, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Bergen (NO)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Heiervang, Einar
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-05-19
Volume
49
Issue
6
Pages
678-685
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2140127409
Cited by
137
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 6
FWCI
12.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Norges Forskningsråd
  • Haukeland Universitetssjukehus
  • Medical Research Council
  • Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
child mental health, cross-cultural comparison, psychopathology, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, Development and Well-Being Assessment, reporting thresholds, underreporting, emotional disorders, externalizing disorders, hyperactivity, peer relationships, parent and teacher ratings, prevalence, Norway, Great Britain
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Data Collection, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Norway, Personality Assessment, Psychometrics, Psychopathology, Bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review