Cited by 161Child Welfare and AdoptionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Abuse and Trauma

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Behavioral and emotional symptoms of post-institutionalized children in middle childhood

Open access
Wiik, Kristen L., Loman, Michelle M., Van Ryzin, Mark J., Armstrong, Jeffrey M., Essex, Marilyn J., Pollak, Seth D., Gunnar, Megan R.·2011·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Experience in institutional/orphanage care has been linked to increased mental health problems. Research suggests that children adopted from institutions experience specific difficulties related to inattention/overactivity. Evidence of internalizing and conduct problems relative to non‐adopted peers has been found in early childhood and early adolescence, but problems may not differ from other adopted children. This study clarifies the understanding of behavioral and emotional symptoms of post‐institutionalized (PI) children during middle childhood. Methods: Eight‐ to eleven‐year‐old PI children ( n = 68) and two comparison groups, children internationally adopted from foster care ( n = 74) and non‐adopted children ( n = 76), and their parents completed the MacArthur Health and Behavior Questionnaire related to attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), externalizing, and internalizing symptoms. Group means for symptom level and number of children with symptoms above clinical cutoffs were compared. Results: PI children displayed an increased level of ADHD symptoms per parent report. PI child and parent report indicated a higher number of PI children above clinical ADHD cutoff. Both groups of internationally adopted (IA) children had higher levels of externalizing symptoms relative to non‐adopted children, with parent report indicating higher numbers of IA children above the externalizing clinical threshold. Informants differed in their report of internalizing symptoms. Parents indicated that both IA groups displayed increased internalizing symptom levels and greater numbers above clinical threshold; however, children reported this to be true only for the PI group. Conclusions: PI children differ from non‐adopted peers across symptom domains in middle childhood. Whether these concerns were more broadly associated with international adoption rather than institutional care depended on symptom domain and informant. An understanding of this variability may be beneficial for treatment and intervention.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02294.x

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1111/1469-7610.00555 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Sonuga‐Barke E., 2009, Adolescent psychiatric morbidity following early severe institutional deprivation: English and Romanian Adoptees Study findings

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wiik, K. L., Loman, M. M., Van Ryzin, M. J., Armstrong, J. M., Essex, M. J., Pollak, S. D., & Gunnar, M. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12-08
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
56-63
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W1815706305
Cited by
161
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
FWCI
22.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Essex
  • Society for Research in Child Development
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Center for Neurobehavioral Development
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH068857, R01MH068858, P50MH084051, R01MH061285)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30HD003352)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
institutional care, international adoption, foster care, middle childhood, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, ADHD symptoms, externalizing problems, internalizing problems, parent report, child self-report, informant differences
MeSH terms
Adoption, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child Behavior, Child, Institutionalized, Emotions, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Minnesota, Parents, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review