Cited by 206Child Welfare and AdoptionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Abuse and Trauma

Institutional care: risk from family background or pattern of rearing

Roy, Penny, Rutter, Michael, Pickles, Andrew·2000·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Previous research has shown that children receiving substitute parental care tend to have high rates of emotional/behavioural disturbance, but uncertainty remains on the extent to which this derives from genetic risk, adverse experiences before receiving substitute care, or from risks associated with substitute care experiences. In order to examine the effects of institutional rearing (as a specific form of substitute care), two groups of primary school children reared in substitute care from before the age of 12 months were compared: 19 children in residential group (institutional) care and 19 in continuous stable foster family care (matched for age and gender). The two groups were similar in coming from biological families with high rates of psychopathology and social malfunctioning, but differed with respect to pattern of rearing. Both groups were compared with classroom controls, using teacher questionnaires, systematic classroom observations, and standardised cognitive testing. Parental questionnaires were also obtained for the two substitute care groups. As found previously, the combined substitute care groups differed from controls in showing a high level of hyperactivity/inattention. The observational measures showed a similar effect, indicating that the elevated rate was not attributable to rater bias. The teacher questionnaire and observational measures showed, however, that the increased level of hyperactivity/ inattention was substantially higher in the institutional group than the foster family group. Parental questionnaire ratings showed the same contrast between the groups, except that the main difference was on unsociability and emotional disturbance rather than hyperactivity/ inattention. It is concluded that, against a background of genetic and early environmental risk, institutional rearing predisposes to a pattern of hyperactivity/inattention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s002196309900517x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple studies have documented a link between institutional care and differences in executive functions.

    “Since Roy et al. (2000) first noted that children raised in institutional care had lower inhibitory control performance and greater symptoms of inattention and hyperactivity than those in stable foster care, multiple studies have documented a link between institutional care and differences in executive functions”
  • Those earlier descriptive studies reported that foster care children fared better developmentally than institutionalized children.

    “Results demonstrated that children in foster care developed more favorably than children in institutions.”
  • Prior to BEIP, few descriptive studies-mainly from the mid-1900s-had contrasted foster care with institutional care.

    “Prior to the study this paper describes, only a small number of descriptive studies, mostly conducted in the mid-20th century, had compared children in foster care to children in institutional care (4–13).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roy, P., Rutter, M., & Pickles, A.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-02
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
139-149
ISSN
0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144543659
Cited by
206
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 18
FWCI
26.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
institutional upbringing, out-of-home care, residential group care, foster care, hyperactivity/inattention, emotional disturbance, unsociability, family background, genetic risk, elementary school students
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child Care, Developmental Disabilities, Child Rearing, Child, Preschool, Family, Female, Foster Home Care, Humans, Hyperkinesis, Infant, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Residential Facilities, Risk Factors, Socialization, Conduct Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review