The DOI matches its Crossref record; 128 of the 128 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Annual Research Review: The nature and classification of reading disorders – a commentary on proposals for DSM‐5
Open accessAbstract
This article reviews our understanding of reading disorders in children and relates it to current proposals for their classification in DSM‐5. There are two different, commonly occurring, forms of reading disorder in children which arise from different underlying language difficulties. Dyslexia (as defined in DSM‐5), or decoding difficulty, refers to children who have difficulty in mastering the relationships between the spelling patterns of words and their pronunciations. These children typically read aloud inaccurately and slowly, and experience additional problems with spelling. Dyslexia appears to arise principally from a weakness in phonological (speech sound) skills, and there is good evidence that it can be ameliorated by systematic phonic teaching combined with phonological awareness training. The other major form of reading difficulty is reading comprehension impairment. These children read aloud accurately and fluently, but have difficulty understanding what they have read. Reading comprehension impairment appears to arise from weaknesses in a range of oral language skills including poor vocabulary knowledge, weak grammatical skills and difficulties in oral language comprehension. We suggest that the omission of reading comprehension impairment from DSM‐5 is a serious one that should be remedied. Both dyslexia and reading comprehension impairment are dimensional in nature, and show strong continuities with other disorders of language. We argue that recognizing the continuities between reading and language disorders has important implications for assessment and treatment, and we note that the high rates of comorbidity between reading disorders and other seemingly disparate disorders (including ADHD and motor disorders) raises important challenges for understanding these disorders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1998) · Cited by 4,875
Decoding, reading, and reading disability.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/074193258600700104 · Cited by 3,972
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3 · Cited by 2,871
Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies
Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., Erskine, J. M., & collaboration with COST Action A8 network (2003) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712603321661859 · Cited by 2,601
Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades?
Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x · Cited by 2,555
Self-citationNeuroscience of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the search for endophenotypes
Castellanos, F. X., & Tannock, R. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn896 · Cited by 1,827 · cited 1×
“Castellanos and Tannock (2002) proposed that a candidate ‘endophenotype’ underlying both reading disorder and ADHD was poor time perception.”
BackgroundTheories of developmental dyslexia: insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults
Ramus, F. (2003) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awg076 · Cited by 1,504
Developmental Dyslexia and Specific Language Impairment: Same or Different?
Bishop, D. V. M., & Snowling, M. J. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.858 · Cited by 1,356
Self-citationEffects of an Extensive Program for Stimulating Phonological Awareness in Preschool Children
Lundberg, I., Frost, J., & Petersen, O.-P. (1988) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.23.3.1 · Cited by 1,308
Stanovich, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1994) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-0663.86.1.24 · Cited by 1,250
Cited by
Specific Learning Disorder: Prevalence and Gender Differences
Moll, K., Kunze, S., Neuhoff, N., Bruder, J., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103537 · Cited by 378
Reading skill components and impairments in middle school struggling readers
Cirino, P. T., Romain, M. A., Barth, A. E., Tolar, T. D., Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2013) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9406-3 · Cited by 131
Psychometric properties of language assessments for children aged 4–12 years: A systematic review
Denman, D., Speyer, R., Munro, N., Pearce, W. M., Chen, Y.-W., & Cordier, R. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01515 · Cited by 87
Bonifacci, P., Storti, M., Tobia, V., & Suardi, A. (2016) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/0022219414566681 · Cited by 84
The genetics of reading disabilities: from phenotypes to candidate genes.
Raskind, W. H., Peter, B., Richards, T., Eckert, M. M., & Berninger, V. W. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00601 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-12-05
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 593-607
- ISSN
- 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7610
- OpenAlex
- W2127327880
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 128
- FWCI
- 32.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Annual Research Review: The nature and classification of reading disorders – a commentary on proposals for DSM‐5. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02495.x
- The paper
- Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (2012). Annual Research Review: The nature and classification of reading disorders – a commentary on proposals for DSM‐5. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02495.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.