Cited by 114Wildlife Ecology and ConservationCensus and Population EstimationAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

Substrate and species constraints on the use of track incidences to estimate African large carnivore abundance

Funston, P. J., Frank, L., Stephens, T., Davidson, Z., Loveridge, A., Macdonald, D. M., Durant, S., Packer, C. +2 more·2010·Journal of Zoology

Abstract

Population size and trends of large carnivores are difficult to determine, but are often needed to inform conservation actions. Direct counts maintained over long time periods are extremely difficult to achieve. Indices of population sizes can be used to estimate large carnivore abundances, but are often case-, species- and site-specific. Here, we test the general applicability of track-based indices to estimate large carnivore abundance. We surveyed 15 306.4 km of roads associated with 339 transects across a wide geographical scale, large range of densities and variable substrates for tracks of African large carnivores. A combined model for all carnivore species on sandy soils serves as a robust approach to predict large carnivore densities. Thus, indices based on track counts can provide useful estimates of carnivore abundance. We found consistent relationships between track densities and the actual carnivore densities, having taken account of substrate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00682.x

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Funston, P. J., Frank, L., Stephens, T., Davidson, Z., Loveridge, A., Macdonald, D. M., Durant, S., Packer, C., Mosser, A., & Ferreira, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Tshwane University of Technology (ZA)
  • Museum of Vertebrate Zoology (US)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Zoological Society of London (GB)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • South African National Parks (ZA)
Corresponding author
Funston, P. J.
Venue
Journal of Zoology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-04-22
Volume
281
Issue
1
Pages
56-65
ISSN
  • 0952-8369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7998
OpenAlex
W1606552287
Cited by
114
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
large carnivores, track counts, abundance estimation, population indices, sandy soil, African carnivores

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review