Cited by 180Wildlife Ecology and ConservationSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangePrimate Behavior and Ecology

Inventory of free-ranging lions Panthera leo in Africa

Open access
Bauer, H., Van Der Merwe, S.·2004·Oryx

Abstract

The number of free ranging African lions Panthera leo has never been comprehensively assessed. We present an inventory of available information, covering most protected areas and ranging in quality from educated guesses to individually known populations. This gives a conservative estimate of 16,500–30,000 free ranging lions in Africa. The inventory shows that populations are small and fragmented in West and Central Africa, whereas the species still occurs widely in East and Southern Africa. The results concur with the current IUCN Red List categorization of the lion as Vulnerable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0030605304000055

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 2008, large carnivore densities in the remaining private LUT were comparable to those found in protected areas elsewhere.

    “In 2008, large carnivore densities in the remaining private LUT were comparable to those found in protected areas elsewhere (Bailey, 2005; Bauer & Van Der Merwe, 2004; Ivan, White & Shenk, 2013; Mills & Hofer, 1998; Thorn et al., 2009; Woodroffe, McNutt & Mills, 2004).”

    From The impact of land reform on the status of large carnivores in Zimbabwe (2016) · cites this paper as Bauer & Van Der Merwe, 2004

    The Inventory of African lions (Table 1; page not supplied) gives lion population estimates for protected areas, providing some context for a density comparison. It does not compare those estimates with large-carnivore densities in the remaining private LUT in 2008, and its data concern lions rather than large carnivores generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [1]1. Conservation Strategies are Failing in West Africa. University of California Press, Berkeley, USA.
  2. [4]4. Ogutu, J.O. & Dublin, H.T. (2002) Demography of lions in Research needs for conservation of lions in West and Central relation to prey and habitat in the Maasai Mara National Africa. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 326, S112-S118. Reserve, Kenya. African Journal of Ecology, 40, 120-129.
  3. [5]5. Creel, S. & Creel, N.M. (1997) Lion density and population Pennycuick, C.J. & Rudnai, J. (1970) A method of identifying structure in the Selous Game Reserve: evaluation of individual lions Panthera leo with an analysis of the reliability hunting quotas and oCtake. African Journal of Ecology, 55, of identification. Journal of Zoology London, 160, 497-508. 83-93.
  4. [8]8. Smuts, G.L., Whyte, I.J. & Dearlove, T.W. (1977) A mass East, R. (1984) Rainfall, soil nutrient status and biomass of large capture technique for lions. East African Wildlife Journal, 15, African savanna mammals. African Journal of Ecology, 22, 81-87. 245-270.
  5. [15]15. Loveridge, A.J., Lynam, T. & Macdonald, D.W. (compilers) techniques, co-management of natural resources and the (2001) Lion Conservation Research, Workshop1: Survey integration of social and natural science. Techniques. Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, University Sarel Van Der Merwe has worked on soil conservation of Oxford, Oxford, UK. and with the South African National Parks Board, and since
  6. [17]17. manager of the African Large Predator Research Unit of the Montfort, A. (1992) Premie `re liste commente ´e des mammife `res University of the Free State, and chair and founder-member du Rwanda. Journal of African Zoology, 106, 141-151. of the African Lion Working Group.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bauer, H., & Van Der Merwe, S.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Venue
Oryx
Published
2004-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
26-31
ISSN
  • 0030-6053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3008
OpenAlex
W2098121012
Cited by
180
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Oryx (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
African lion, lion, population inventory, population estimates, population fragmentation, protected areas, IUCN Red List, vulnerable species, West Africa, Central Africa, East Africa, Southern Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review