Cited by 17Wildlife Ecology and ConservationRangeland and Wildlife ManagementAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

Using spoor and prey counts to determine temporal and spatial variation in lion (Panthera leo) density

Open access
Bauer, D., Schiess-Meier, M., Mills, D.R., Gusset, M.·2014·Canadian Journal of Zoology

Abstract

In many African countries, large carnivores such as lions (Panthera leo (L., 1758)) are under serious threat through conflict with people, declining prey abundance, and exposure to disease. Spoor and prey count surveys were used to determine temporal and spatial variation in lion density in Khutse Game Reserve (KGR), Botswana, and the adjacent communal grazing area. Estimated lion density in KGR for the period September 2008 – June 2010 was 41% lower than for the period June 2007 – August 2008 (1.02 vs. 1.72 lions/100 km 2). Prior to this population crash in mid-2008, estimated lion density in the communal grazing area (1.21 lions/100 km 2) was 30% lower than inside KGR. The relative abundance of the three most abundant, preferred prey species of lions occurring in KGR decreased from 2001 to 2008 by 50%–79%. Based on two prey biomass estimates, the lion population in KGR was below the potential carrying capacity of the habitat after the crash in mid-2008. These results suggest that there could be a human-caused population sink around KGR, which might be strong enough to threaten the long-term survival of lions in the area; particularly if this edge effect is intensified by prey depletion and disease outbreaks, which might have caused the sudden decline in the lion population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/cjz-2013-0176

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [13]13. Funston, P.J., Hermann, E., Babupi, P., Kruiper, A., Kruiper, H., Jaggers, H., Masule, K., and Kruiper, K. 2001. Spoor frequency estimates as a method of determining lion and other large mammal densities in the Kgalagadi Trans- frontier Park. In Kalahari Transfrontier lion project. Edited by P.J. Funston. Endangered Wildlife Trust, Johannesburg. pp. 36-52.
  2. [20]20. Hanby, J.P., Bygott, J.D., and Packer, C. 1995. Ecology, demography, and behavior of lions in two contrasting habitats: Ngorongoro Crater and the Serengeti plains. In Serengeti II: dynamics, management, and conservation of an eco- system. Edited by A.R.E Sinclair and P. Arcese. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. pp. 315-331.
  3. [29]29. Loveridge, A.J., Hemson, G., Davidson, Z., and Macdonald, D.W. 2010. African lions on the edge: reserve boundaries as "attractive sinks". In Biology and conservation of wild felids. Edited by D.W. Macdonald and A.J. Loveridge. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 283-304.
  4. [37]37. Ramsauer, S. 2006. Living at low density: a study of within and between pride dynamics in Kalahari lions. Ph.D. thesis, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bauer, D., Schiess-Meier, M., Mills, D. R., & Gusset, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Hohenheim (DE)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Leopard Ecology & Conservation, Khutse Game Reserve, Private Bag BR7, Gaborone, Botswana.
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Zoology
Published
2014-02
Volume
92
Issue
2
Pages
97-104
ISSN
  • 0008-4301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1480-3283
OpenAlex
W2171901893
Cited by
17
References
45
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
Messerli-Stiftung
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
lion, population density, prey biomass, temporal variation, spatial variability, carrying capacity, sink populations, large carnivore conservation, habitat edge effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review