Cited by 301Bioenergy crop production and managementForest Biomass Utilization and ManagementAgricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Yield and spatial supply of bioenergy poplar and willow short-rotation coppice in the UK

Open access

Aylott, Matthew J., Casella, E., Tubby, I., Street, N. R., Smith, P., Taylor, Gail·2008·New Phytologist

DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02396.x

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Limited information on likely supply and spatial yield of bioenergy crops exists for the UK. Here, productivities are reported of poplar (Populus spp.) and willow (Salix spp.) grown as short-rotation coppice (SRC), using data from a large 49-site yield trial network. A partial least-squares regression technique was used to upscale actual field trial observations across England and Wales. Spatial productivity was then assessed under different land-use scenarios. Mean modelled yields ranged between 4.9 and 10.7 oven-dry tonnes (odt) ha(-1) yr(-1). Yields were generally higher in willow than in poplar, reflecting the susceptibility of older poplar genotypes to rust and their tendency for single stem dominance. Replacing 10% of arable land, 20% of improved grassland and 100% of set-aside grassland in England and Wales with the three most productive genotypes would yield 13 Modt of biomass annually (supplying 7% of UK electricity production or 48% of UK combined heat and power (CHP) production). Results show existing SRC genotypes have the immediate potential to be an important component of a mixed portfolio of renewables and that, in future, as new and improved genotypes become available, higher yields could extend this potential further.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02396.x

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Particle‐size Analysis
Gee, G. W., & Bauder, J. W. (1986) · Soil Science Society of America book series · doi:10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c15 · Cited by 10,674
Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels
Hill, J., Nelson, E., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Tiffany, D. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0604600103 · Cited by 2,871
Determination of pH
Wedborg, M., Turner, D. R., Anderson, L. G., & Dyrssen, D. W. (1999) · doi:10.1002/9783527613984.ch7 · Cited by 1,162
The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply: a review of 17 studies
Berndes, G., Hoogwijk, M., & van den Broek, R. (2003) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/s0961-9534(02)00185-x · Cited by 1,149
Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Future Automotive Fuels and Powertrains in the European Context
Edwards, R., Mahieu, V., Griesemann, J. C., Jean-Francois, L., & Rickeard, D. J. (2004) · SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · doi:10.4271/2004-01-1924 · Cited by 1,042
Energy crops: current status and future prospects
Sims, R., Hastings, A., Schlamadinger, B., Taylor, G., & Smith, P. (2006) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01163.x · Cited by 489
Self-citation
The generation of monthly gridded datasets for a range of climatic variables over the UK
Perry, M., & Hollis, D. (2005) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.1161 · Cited by 471
Bioenergy crops and carbon sequestration
Lemus, R., & Lal, R. (2005) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352680590910393 · Cited by 455
Identifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployment of dedicated bioenergy crops in the UK
Rowe, R. L., Street, N. R., & Taylor, G. (2009) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2007.07.008 · Cited by 437
Self-citation
Natural and induced cadmium-accumulation in poplar and willow: Implications for phytoremediation
Robinson, B. H., Mills, T. M., Petit, D., Fung, L. E., Green, S. R., & Clothier, B. (2000) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1026515007319 · Cited by 332

Show all 46 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

BERR, 2004, Renewables innovation review
British Forestry Commission., 2007, Biomass Action Plan for Scotland
Britt C, 2002, Bioenergy crops and bioremediation – a review
Defra, 2006, Creating value from renewable materials: a strategy for nonfood crops and uses, Two year progress report (Part 1)
Defra, 2006, Agricultural land use: 1986–2005, United Kingdom (Online database)
Defra, 2007, Energy crop scheme: establishment grants handbook
Drax, 2006, Corporate and social responsibility review – tackling climate change
EC, 2005, Communication from the commission: Biomass action plan
Gill B, 2005, Biomass task force: Report to government
Houghton J., 2006, Breaking the biological barriers for cellulosic: a joint research agenda
Hulme M, 2002, Climate change scenarios for the United Kingdom: the UKCIP02 scientific report
MacLeay I, 2007, The digest of UK energy statistics 2007
Rook DA, 1991, Tree breeding and short rotation coppice
Scottish Executive, 2007, Biomass action plan for Scotland
Skea J, 2006, Response to the Government's Energy Review consultation

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 300

Different response between woody core and bark of goat willow (Salix caprea L.) to concentrated phosphoric acid pretreatment followed by enzymatic saccharification
Yoon, S.-Y., Kim, B.-R., Han, S.-H., & Shin, S. (2014) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.006 · Cited by 33
Impact of perennial energy crops income variability on the crop selection of risk averse farmers
Alexander, P. M., & Moran, D. (2012) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.019 · Cited by 32
Interaction network of ABA receptors in grey poplar
Papacek, M., Christmann, A., & Grill, E. (2017) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.13646 · Cited by 33
Role of biomass supply chain management in sustainable bioenergy production
Kumar, D., & Singh, B. (2017) · Biofuels · doi:10.1080/17597269.2017.1368060 · Cited by 34
A multi‐criteria based review of models that predict environmental impacts of land use‐change for perennial energy crops on water, carbon and nitrogen cycling
Thomas, A. R. C., Bond, A. J., & Hiscock, K. M. (2013) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01198.x · Cited by 31
Mixed short rotation plantations of Populus alba and Robinia pseudoacacia for biomass yield
Oliveira, N., del Rı́o, M., Forrester, D. I., Rodríguez‐Soalleiro, R., Pérez‐Cruzado, C., Cañellas, I., & Sixto, H. (2017) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2017.12.034 · Cited by 31
Commercially Grown Short Rotation Coppice Willow in Denmark: Biomass Production and Factors Affecting Production
Nord‐Larsen, T., Sevel, L., & Raulund‐Rasmussen, K. (2014) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-014-9517-6 · Cited by 31
Soil fungal and bacterial responses to conversion of open land to short‐rotation woody biomass crops
Xue, C., Penton, C. R., Zhang, B., Zhao, M., Rothstein, D. E., Mladenoff, D. J., Forrester, J. A., Shen, Q., & Tiedje, J. M. (2015) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12303 · Cited by 30
Trade-Off between Energy Wood and Grain Production in Temperate Alley-Cropping Systems: An Empirical and Simulation-Based Derivation of Land Equivalent Ratio
Seserman, D.-M., Freese, D., Swieter, A., Langhof, M., & Veste, M. (2019) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture9070147 · Cited by 30
Optimal combinable and dedicated energy crop scenarios for marginal land
Glithero, N. J., Wilson, P. N., & Ramsden, S. J. (2015) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.119 · Cited by 30
Harvesting Carbon from Eastern US Forests: Opportunities and Impacts of an Expanding Bioenergy Industry
Davis, S. C., Dietze, M. C., DeLucia, E. H., Field, C. B., Hamburg, S. P., Loarie, S. R., Parton, W. J., Potts, M. D., Ramage, B. S., Wang, D., et al. (2012) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f3020370 · Cited by 31
Effect of land‐use change and management on biogenic volatile organic compound emissions – selecting climate‐smart cultivars
Rosenkranz, M., Pugh, T. A. M., Schnitzler, J., & Arneth, A. (2014) · Plant Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.12453 · Cited by 30
Comparing predicted yield and yield stability of willow and Miscanthus across Denmark
Larsen, S., Jaiswal, D., Bentsen, N. S., Wang, D., & Long, S. P. (2015) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12318 · Cited by 29
Spatial yield estimates of fast‐growing willow plantations for energy based on climatic variables in northern Europe
Mola‐Yudego, B., Rahlf, J., Astrup, R., & Dimitriou, I. (2015) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12332 · Cited by 29
Carbon balance and soil carbon input in a poplar short rotation coppice plantation as affected by nitrogen and wood ash application
Ventura, M., Panzacchi, P., Muzzi, E., Magnani, F., & Tonon, G. (2019) · New Forests · doi:10.1007/s11056-019-09709-w · Cited by 29
Reducing the establishment costs of short rotation willow coppice (SRC) – A trial of a novel layflat planting system at an upland site in mid-Wales
Lowthe-Thomas, S. C., Slater, F. M., & Randerson, P. F. (2010) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.01.011 · Cited by 29
A sustainability framework for assessing studies about marginal lands for planting perennial energy crops
Jiang, W., Jacobson, M. G., & Langholtz, M. (2018) · Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1948 · Cited by 29
Variation and Genetic Parameters of Leaf Morphological Traits of Eight Families from Populus simonii × P. nigra
Ren, J., Ji, X., Wang, C., Hu, J., Nervo, G., & Li, J. (2020) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f11121319 · Cited by 28
Marginal lands providing tree‐crop biomass as feedstock for solid biofuels
Kamperidou, V., Terzopoulou, P., & Barboutis, I. (2021) · Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.2235 · Cited by 30
Carbon isotope compositions (δ 13 C) of leaf, wood and holocellulose differ among genotypes of poplar and between previous land uses in a short‐rotation biomass plantation
Verlinden, M. S., Fichot, R., Broeckx, L. S., Vanholme, B., Boerjan, W., & Ceulemans, R. (2014) · Plant Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.12383 · Cited by 27
Estimating bio-energy resource potentials to 2050: learning from experience
Slade, R., Gross, R., & Bauen, A. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c0ee00732c · Cited by 27
Alley coppice—a new system with ancient roots
Morhart, C. D., Douglas, G. C., Dupraz, C., Graves, A. R., Nahm, M., Paris, P., Sauter, U. H., Sheppard, J. P., & Spiecker, H. (2014) · Annals of Forest Science · doi:10.1007/s13595-014-0373-5 · Cited by 27
Selected environmental impacts of the technical production of wood chips from poplar short rotation coppice on marginal land
Schweier, J., Schnitzler, J., & Becker, G. (2015) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.018 · Cited by 31
Pyrolysis of Nordic biomass types in a cyclone pilot plant — Mass balances and yields
Sandström, L., Johansson, A., Wiinikka, H., Öhrman, O., & Marklund, M. (2016) · Fuel Processing Technology · doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.06.015 · Cited by 27
Biogenic Carbon—Capture and Sequestration
Harris, Z. M., Milner, S., & Taylor, G. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-101036-5.00005-7 · Cited by 27
Self-citation
Can sunflower provide biofuel for inland demand? An integrated assessment of sustainability at regional scale
Ragaglini, G., Triana, F., Villani, R., & Bonari, E. (2010) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.03.009 · Cited by 27
Biomass Yield of 37 Different SRC Poplar Varieties Grown on a Typical Site in North Eastern Germany
Landgraf, D., Carl, C., & Neupert, M. (2020) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f11101048 · Cited by 26
Assessing on-farm productivity of Miscanthus crops by combining soil mapping, yield modelling and remote sensing
Richter, G. M., Agostini, F., Barker, A., Costomiris, D., & Qi, A. (2015) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.024 · Cited by 26
The economics of dedicated hybrid poplar biomass plantations in the western U.S.
Chudy, R. P., Busby, G., Binkley, C. S., & Stanton, B. J. (2019) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.03.010 · Cited by 26
Long-term yield effects of establishment method and weed control in willow for short rotation coppice (SRC)
Larsen, S. U., Jørgensen, U., Kjeldsen, J. B., & Lærke, P. E. (2014) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.10.001 · Cited by 25
Bioenergy provision by an alley cropping system of grassland and shrub willow hybrids: biomass, fuel characteristics and net energy yields
Ehret, M., Bühle, L., Graß, R., Lamersdorf, N. P., & Wachendorf, M. (2014) · Agroforestry Systems · doi:10.1007/s10457-014-9773-7 · Cited by 25
Production of selected short-rotation wood crop species and quality of obtained biomass
Civitarese, V., Faugno, S., Picchio, R., Assirelli, A., Sperandio, G., Saulino, L., Crimaldi, M., & Sannino, M. (2018) · European Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1007/s10342-018-1122-3 · Cited by 24
Petiole and leaf traits of poplar in relation to parentage and biomass yield
Gebauer, R., Vanbeveren, S. P. P., Volařík, D., Plichta, R., & Ceulemans, R. (2015) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2015.11.036 · Cited by 23
Biomass Performance and Competition Effects in an Established Temperate Agroforestry System of Willow and Grassland—Results of the 2nd Rotation
Graß, R., Malec, S., & Wachendorf, M. (2020) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy10111819 · Cited by 23
Productivity and Biometric Characteristics of 11 Varieties of Willow Cultivated on Marginal Soil
Matyka, M., & Radzikowski, P. (2020) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture10120616 · Cited by 23
Poplar rotation coppice at a trace element-contaminated phytomanagement site: A 10-year study revealing biomass production, element export and impact on extractable elements
Chalot, M., Girardclos, O., Ciadamidaro, L., Zappelini, C., Yung, L., Durand, A., Pfendler, S., Lamy, I., Driget, V., & Blaudez, D. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134260 · Cited by 22
Energy crops for biofuel production: Analysis of the potential in Tuscany
Marta, A. D., Mancini, M., Ferrise, R., Bindi, M., & Orlandini, S. (2010) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.02.012 · Cited by 22
Rust Infection of Black Poplar Trees Reduces Photosynthesis but Does Not Affect Isoprene Biosynthesis or Emission
Eberl, F., Perreca, E., Vogel, H., Wright, L. P., Hammerbacher, A., Veit, D., Gershenzon, J., & Unsicker, S. B. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01733 · Cited by 22
Paclobutrazol and plant-growth promoting bacterial endophyte Pantoea sp. enhance copper tolerance of guinea grass (Panicum maximum) in hydroponic culture
Huo, W., Zhuang, C.-H., Ya, C., Pu, M., Yao, H., Lou, L., & Cai, Q. (2011) · Acta Physiologiae Plantarum · doi:10.1007/s11738-011-0812-y · Cited by 22
Impact of short‐rotation coppice with poplar and willow on soil physical properties
Kahle, P., & Janssen, M. (2020) · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science · doi:10.1002/jpln.201900443 · Cited by 21
Bioenergy utilization for a low carbon future in the UK: the evaluation of some alternative scenarios and projections
Allen, P. E., & Hammond, G. P. (2019) · BMC Energy · doi:10.1186/s42500-019-0002-9 · Cited by 21
Conversion of open lands to short‐rotation woody biomass crops: site variability affects nitrogen cycling and N2O fluxes in the US Northern Lake States
Palmer, M. M., Forrester, J. A., Rothstein, D. E., & Mladenoff, D. J. (2013) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12069 · Cited by 19
Modelling short‐rotation coppice and tree planting for urban carbon management – a citywide analysis
McHugh, N. J., Edmondson, J. L., Gaston, K. J., Leake, J. R., & O’Sullivan, O. S. (2015) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12491 · Cited by 19
Lignocellulosic‐based bioenergy and water quality parameters: a review
Acharya, B. S., & Blanco‐Canqui, H. (2018) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12508 · Cited by 21
Modelling the nutrient cost of biomass harvesting under different silvicultural and climate scenarios in production forests
Achat, D. L., Martel, S., Picart, D., Moisy, C., Augusto, L., Bakker, M. R., & Loustau, D. (2018) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2018.06.047 · Cited by 19
Productivity ranges of sustainable biomass potentials from non-agricultural land
Schueler, V., Fuss, S., Steckel, J. C., Weddige, U., & Beringer, T. (2016) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074026 · Cited by 19
Implications of technological development to forestry
Hetemäki, L., Méry, G., Holopainen, M., Hyyppa, J. M., Vaario, L., & Yrjälä, K. (2010) · Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)) · Cited by 19
Toward improved drought tolerance in bioenergy crops: QTL for carbon isotope composition and stomatal conductance in P opulus
Viger, M., Rodríguez‐Acosta, M., Rae, A. M., Morison, J. I. L., & Taylor, G. (2013) · Food and Energy Security · doi:10.1002/fes3.39 · Cited by 18
Self-citation
Phytoremediation: A Green Technology
Jan, S., & Parray, J. A. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-1693-6_5 · Cited by 18
A mixed model approach for evaluating yield improvements in interspecific hybrids of shrub willow, a dedicated bioenergy crop
Fabio, E. S., Kemanian, A. R., Montes, F., Miller, R. O., & Smart, L. B. (2016) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.11.019 · Cited by 18
High Biomass Productivity of Short-Rotation Willow Plantation in Boreal Hokkaido Achieved by Mulching and Cutback
Han, Q., Harayama, H., Uemura, A., Ito, E., Utsugi, H., Kitao, M., & Maruyama, Y. (2020) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f11050505 · Cited by 18
Stand age characteristics and soil properties affect species composition of vascular plants in short rotation coppice plantations
Baum, S., Weih, M., & Bolte, A. (2012) · BIORISK – Biodiversity and Ecosystem Risk Assessment · doi:10.3897/biorisk.7.2699 · Cited by 17
Development of a sink–source interaction model for the growth of short-rotation coppice willow and in silico exploration of genotype×environment effects
Cerasuolo, M., Richter, G. M., Richard, B., Cunniff, J., Girbau, S., Shield, I. F., Purdy, S., & Karp, A. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erv507 · Cited by 17
Establishment phase greenhouse gas emissions in short rotation woody biomass plantations in the Northern Lake States, USA
Palmer, M. M., Forrester, J. A., Rothstein, D. E., & Mladenoff, D. J. (2014) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.01.021 · Cited by 16
Simulation of environmental impact scores within the life cycle of mixed wood chips from alternative short rotation coppice systems in Flanders (Belgium)
Rugani, B., Golkowska, K., Vázquez‐Rowe, I., Köster, D., Benetto, E., & Verdonckt, P. (2015) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.07.032 · Cited by 16
Modelling the spatial allocation of second-generation feedstock (lignocellulosic crops) in Europe
Carolina, P. C., Lavalle, C., Baranzelli, C., & Mubareka, S. (2015) · International Journal of Geographical Information Systems · doi:10.1080/13658816.2015.1051486 · Cited by 16
Analyzing the impact of climate and management factors on the productivity and soil carbon sequestration of poplar plantations
Wang, D., Fan, J., Jing, P., Cheng, Y. J., & Ruan, H. (2015) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2015.10.016 · Cited by 15
Short rotation woody energy crop supply chains
Whittaker, C., & Shield, I. F. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-78242-366-9.00010-1 · Cited by 15
Poplar
Dillen, S. Y., Kasmioui, O. E., Marron, N., Calfapietra, C., & Ceulemans, R. (2010) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · doi:10.1039/9781849732048-00275 · Cited by 15
A GIS-based evaluation of the potential of woody short rotation coppice (SRC) in Portugal aiming at co-firing and decentralized co-generation
Rodrigues, A. M., Gonçalves, A. B., Casquilho, M., & Gomes, A. A. (2020) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105554 · Cited by 15
PopFor: A new model for estimating poplar yields
Henner, D. N., Hastings, A., Pogson, M., McNamara, N. P., Davies, C. A., & Smith, P. (2020) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105470 · Cited by 14
Self-citation
Current (2020) and Long-Term (2035 and 2050) Sustainable Potentials of Wood Fuel in Switzerland
Erni, M., Burg, V., Bont, L., Thees, O., Ferretti, M. P., Stadelmann, G., & Schweier, J. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12229749 · Cited by 14
Detection of Hybrids in Willows (Salix, Salicaceae) Using Genome-Wide DArTseq Markers
Vašut, R. J., Pospíšková, M., Lukavský, J., & Weger, J. (2024) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants13050639 · Cited by 13
Bioenergy potential in Germany - assessing spatial patterns of biomass production with aspen short-rotation coppice
Kollas, C., Lasch‐Born, P., Rock, J., & Suckow, F. (2009) · Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) · Cited by 13
Differences in isoprene and monoterpene emissions from cold-tolerant eucalypt species grown in the UK
Purser, G., Heal, M. R., White, S., Morison, J. I. L., & Drewer, J. (2020) · Atmospheric Pollution Research · doi:10.1016/j.apr.2020.07.022 · Cited by 13
Feasibility of SRC Species for Growing in Mediterranean Conditions
Navarro, A., Stellacci, A. M., Campi, P., Vitti, C., Modugno, F., & Mastrorilli, M. (2015) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-015-9677-z · Cited by 13
Carbon and nutrient dynamics in short-rotation coppice of poplar and willow in a converted marginal land, a case study in central France
Guénon, R., Bastien, J.-C., Thiébeau, P., Bodineau, G., & Bertrand, I. (2016) · Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10705-016-9805-y · Cited by 13
A generic platform for hyperspectral mapping of wood
Defoirdt, N., Șen, A. U., Dhaene, J., Mil, T. D., Pereira, H., Acker, J. V., & den Bulcke, J. V. (2017) · Wood Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s00226-017-0903-z · Cited by 13
Soil & Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) simulated hydrological impacts of land use change from temperate grassland to energy crops: A case study in western UK
Holder, A. J., Rowe, R. L., McNamara, N. P., Donnison, I. S., & McCalmont, J. P. (2019) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12628 · Cited by 13
Perspective
Allan, G. J., Shuster, S. M., Woolbright, S. A., Walker, F. M., Meneses, N., Keith, A. R., Bailey, J. K., & Whitham, T. G. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511736551.021 · Cited by 13
Exploitation and utilization of Miscanthus as energy plant
Yi, Z. (2013) · JOURNAL OF HUNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1238.2012.00455 · Cited by 13
Can the agricultural AquaCrop model simulate water use and yield of a poplar short‐rotation coppice?
Horemans, J. A., Gaelen, H. V., Raes, D., Zenone, T., & Ceulemans, R. (2016) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12422 · Cited by 12
Floristic diversity in Short Rotation Coppice (SRC)plantations: Comparison between soil seed bank and recent vegetation
Baum, S., Weih, M., & Bolte, A. (2013) · OpenAgrar · doi:10.3220/lbf_2013_221-228 · Cited by 12
BIOMASS PRODUCTION OF ENERGY WILLOW UNDER UNFAVOURABLE FIELD CONDITIONS
Mikó, P. (2014) · Applied Ecology and Environmental Research · doi:10.15666/aeer/1201_001011 · Cited by 11
Proteome analysis reveals an energy-dependent central process for Populus×canadensis seed germination
Zhang, H., Zhou, K., Wang, W.-Q., Liu, S., & Song, S. (2017) · Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2017.03.008 · Cited by 11
Isoprene-degrading bacteria associated with the phyllosphere of Salix fragilis, a high isoprene-emitting willow of the Northern Hemisphere
Gibson, L., Crombie, A. T., McNamara, N. P., & Murrell, J. C. (2021) · Environmental Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40793-021-00386-x · Cited by 11
Assessing the impact of fertilizer application on net soil-derived emission budgets from a temperate willow (Salix miyabeana) short rotation coppice system
Lutes, K., Oelbermann, M., Thevathasan, N. V., & Gordon, A. M. (2018) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.11.010 · Cited by 11
Effects of cultivation technologies on woody biomass yield of various willow (Salix spp.) cultivars
Bakšienė, E., & Ankuda, J. (2018) · Zemdirbyste-Agriculture · doi:10.13080/z-a.2018.105.043 · Cited by 10
Combining a land surface model with life cycle assessment for identifying the optimal management of short rotation coppice in Belgium
Djomo, S. N., Groote, T. D., Gobin, A., Ceulemans, R., & Janssens, I. A. (2018) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.12.010 · Cited by 10
Productivity of Short-Rotation Poplar Crops: A Case Study in the NE of Romania
Constantin, I., Mititelu, C., & Palaghianu, C. (2022) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f13071089 · Cited by 10
A pseudo-3D model to optimise the target traits of light interception in short-rotation coppice willow
Cerasuolo, M., Richter, G. M., Cunniff, J., Purdy, S., Shield, I. F., & Karp, A. (2012) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.11.022 · Cited by 10
Growth and Above-ground Biomass Production of a Willow Clone with High Productivity, Salix pet-susu clone KKD
Satoh, S., Ishizawa, K., Mitsui, Y., & Minato, K. (2012) · Journal of the Japan Institute of Energy · doi:10.3775/jie.91.948 · Cited by 10
Poplar–Root Knot Nematode Interaction: A Model for Perennial Woody Species
Baldacci‐Cresp, F., Sacré, P., Twyffels, L., Mol, A., Vermeersch, M., Ziémons, E., Hubert, P., Pérez-Morga, D. L., Jaziri, M. E., Engler, J. D. A., et al. (2016) · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions · doi:10.1094/mpmi-01-16-0015-r · Cited by 10
Potential of a short rotation coppice poplar as a feedstock for platform chemicals and lignin-based building blocks
Rohde, V., Hahn, T., Wagner, M., Böringer, S., Tübke, B., Brosse, N., Dahmen, N., & Schmiedl, D. (2018) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.07.034 · Cited by 10
Evaluating potential policies for the UK perennial energy crop market to achieve carbon abatement and deliver a source of low carbon electricity
Alexander, P. M., Moran, D., & Rounsevell, M. (2015) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.04.025 · Cited by 10
Woody Biomass
Wright, L. L., Eaton, L., Perlack, R. D., & Stokes, B. J. (2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-087872-0.00520-5 · Cited by 10
Can short-rotation coppice strips compensate structural deficits in agrarian landscapes?
Glemnitz, M., Platen, R., Krechel, R., Konrad, J., & Wagener, F. (2013) · Aspects of applied biology · Cited by 10
Influence of soil chemical and physical characteristics on willow yield in Connecticut
Kuzovkina, Y. A., Schulthess, C. P., & Zheng, D. (2017) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.11.021 · Cited by 10
The Performance of Five Willow Cultivars under Different Pedoclimatic Conditions and Rotation Cycles
Nissim, W. G., Lafleur, B., & Labrecque, M. (2018) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f9060349 · Cited by 10
Potential Profitability Zones for Populus spp. Biomass Plantings in the Eastern United States
Stanturf, J. A., Young, T. M., Perdue, J. H., Doughetry, D., Pigott, M., Guo, Z., & Huang, X. (2017) · Forest Science · doi:10.5849/fs-2016-101 · Cited by 9
Flux of Root-Derived Carbon into the Nematode Micro-Food Web: A Comparison of Grassland and Agroforest
Hemmerling, C., Li, Z., Shi, L., Pausch, J., & Rueß, L. (2022) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy12040976 · Cited by 9
Combustion quality of poplar and willow clones grown as SRC at four sites in Brandenburg, Germany
Liu, N., Larsen, S. U., Jørgensen, U., Murach, D., Pflugmacher, C., Hartmann, H., & Lærke, P. E. (2017) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.08.020 · Cited by 9
The effects of weather, harvest frequency, and rotation number on yield of short rotation coppice willow over 10 years in northern Japan
Harayama, H., Uemura, A., Utsugi, H., Han, Q., Kitao, M., & Maruyama, Y. (2020) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105797 · Cited by 9
Bark Content of Two Shrub Willow Cultivars Grown at Two Sites and Relationships with Centroid Bark Content and Stem Diameter
Eich, S., Volk, T. A., & Eisenbies, M. H. (2015) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-015-9617-y · Cited by 9
Reviewing models of land availability and dynamics for biofuel crops in the United States and the European Union
Li, R., Virgilio, N. D., Guan, Q., Song, F., & Richter, G. M. (2013) · Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1419 · Cited by 10
Lighting the way to willow biomass production
Cunniff, J., & Cerasuolo, M. (2011) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.4470 · Cited by 9
Poplar growth and wood production on a grassland irrigated for decades with potato starch wastewater
Lorenc–Plucińska, G., Walentynowicz, M., & Lewandowski, A. (2016) · Agroforestry Systems · doi:10.1007/s10457-016-9930-2 · Cited by 9
Hydrogen Economics and Policy
Hughes, N., & Agnolucci, P. (2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-087872-0.00417-0 · Cited by 9
The UK bio-energy resource base to 2050: estimates, assumptions, and uncertainties
Slade, R., Bauen, A., & Gross, R. (2010) · Spiral (Imperial College London) · doi:10.25561/6020 · Cited by 9
Harvesting Solar Energy through Natural or Artificial Photosynthesis: Scientific, Social, Political and Economic Implications
Larkum, A. W. D. (2011) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · doi:10.1039/9781849733038-00001 · Cited by 8

Authors: Aylott, M. J., Casella, E., Tubby, I., Street, N. R., Smith, P., & Taylor, G.
Affiliations: University of Southampton (GB)
Forest Research (GB)
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author: Taylor, Gail
ORCID: Casella, E.
Street, N. R.
Smith, P.
Taylor, Gail
Venue: New Phytologist
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 2008-03-05
Volume: 178
Issue: 2
Pages: 358-370
ISSN: 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
1469-8137
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02396.x
OpenAlex: W2032622308
Semantic Scholar: 07c842152db37a1749873032ef40858232e6fbbe
Cited by: 301
References: 46
Citations by year: 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 33
FWCI: 27.01
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: hybrid
doi.org
Licence: other-oa
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations: New Phytologist (publishedVersion, other-oa)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
Funders: UK Energy Research Centre
University of Edinburgh
Natural Environment Research Council (NE/C516344/1, NE/C513169/1, NE/C516301/1)
Topics: Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
Keywords: short rotation coppice, poplar, willow, energy crops, biomass yield, land use scenarios, poplar rust, biomass supply, electricity generation, combined heat and power, renewable energy, England and Wales
MeSH terms: Agriculture, Conservation of Energy Resources, United Kingdom, Models, Biological, Populus, Salix

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Yield and spatial supply of bioenergy poplar and willow short-rotation coppice in the UK

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks