Cited by 54Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlTactile and Sensory InteractionsNeuroscience and Music Perception

The Temporal Locations of Heartbeat Sensations

Ring, Christopher, Brener, Jasper·1992·Psychophysiology

Abstract

This experiment examined individual differences in the temporal location of heartbeat sensations and the reliability of their detection. Following practice on a familiarization task in judging light-tone simultaneity, 50 subjects were studied for two sessions on a heartbeat detection task, which required judging the simultaneity of heartbeat sensations and tones presented at six intervals following the onset of ventricular contraction. Subjects inspected the heartbeat-tone intervals as frequently and for as long as desired before choosing the one in which heartbeat sensations and tones were most simultaneous. The temporal locations of heartbeat sensations in subjects classified as "good heartbeat perceivers" (n = 16) ranged from 131 and 363 ms following ventricular contraction (mean = 228 ms). Correlations between the familiarization and heartbeat detection tasks in the accuracy of simultaneity judgments and in the frequency and duration of interval inspections suggest that general perceptual abilities and strategies may underlie success in detecting heartbeat sensations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1992.tb02027.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals perceive heartbeats at different locations within the body, each associated with a different temporal delay.

    “This problem is exacerbated by the fact that individuals perceive heartbeats at different locations within the body, each of which is associated with a different temporal delay (Brener and Kluvitse, 1988; Christopher Ring and Brener, 1992).”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Christopher Ring and Brener, 1992

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ring, C., & Brener, J.
Affiliations
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • State University of New York (US)
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-09
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
535-545
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
OpenAlex
W2010872088
Cited by
54
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hl042366-06)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL 42366)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
heartbeat perception, simultaneity judgment, heartbeat detection, individual differences, perceptual reliability, ventricular contraction
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Attention, Autonomic Nervous System, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Individuality, Male, Myocardial Contraction, Psychophysiology, Time Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review