Cited by 198Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesStress Responses and CortisolPersonality Traits and Psychology

Neuroticism is associated with larger and more prolonged electrodermal responses to emotionally evocative pictures

Open access
Norris, Catherine J., Larsen, Jeff T., Cacioppo, John T.·2007·Psychophysiology

Abstract

Elevated neuroticism is associated with increased psychological reactivity to stressors. Research on individual differences and physiological reactivity (e.g., electrodermal activity), however, has focused on clinical samples and measures of basal activity (e.g., nonspecific skin conductance responses) or responses to nonaffective stimuli. Surprisingly, there is a dearth of work on physiological reactivity to emotional stimuli as a function of neuroticism. Thus, the authors sought to examine the relationship between neuroticism and skin conductance reactivity to emotionally evocative pictures in a nonclinical sample. Individuals higher in neuroticism exhibited both greater skin conductance reactivity to emotional (and particularly aversive) pictures as well as more extended reactivity than did emotionally stable individuals. Implications for health are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00551.x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals high in neuroticism are more reactive physiologically and subjectively to negative and positive emotional stimuli than individuals who are emotionally stable.

    “individuals high in neuroticism are more reactive (physiologically and subjectively) to negative and positive emotional stimuli than individuals who are emotionally stable (Norris et al., 2007).”

    From Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators (2011) · cites this paper as Norris et al., 2007

    The Skin Conductance Reactivity results (p. 824) show greater physiological responses among participants higher in neuroticism to both pleasant and unpleasant pictures than to neutral pictures. The Discussion also describes more intense emotional reactions to stressors, but the study did not establish greater subjective reactivity to both positive and negative pictures; its picture-valence ratings were normative rather than participants’ reported reactions. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [7]7. Cacioppo, J. T., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Emotions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 191-214.
  2. [31]31. C.J. Norris, J.T. Larsen, and J.T. Cacioppo 14698986, 2007, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00551.x by Readcube (Labtiva Inc.), Wiley Online Library on [23/06/2026]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norris, C. J., Larsen, J. T., & Cacioppo, J. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Texas Tech University (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Norris, Catherine J.
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-06-26
Volume
44
Issue
5
Pages
823-826
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
OpenAlex
W2133017516
Cited by
198
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (P50 MH-72850, P50MH072850)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
neuroticism, electrodermal activity, emotional stimuli, emotional reactivity, individual differences, stress reactivity, non-clinical sample
MeSH terms
Adult, Emotions, Extraversion, Psychological, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Neurotic Disorders, Personality Tests, Photic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review