Cited by 134Action Observation and SynchronizationTeam Dynamics and PerformanceHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Physiological evidence of interpersonal dynamics in a cooperative production task

Open access
Mønster, Dan, Håkonsson, Dorthe Døjbak, Eskildsen, Jacob Kjær, Wallot, Sebastian·2016·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

Recent research suggests that shared behavioral dynamics during interpersonal interaction are indicative of subjective and objective outcomes of the interaction, such as feelings of rapport and success of performance. The role of shared physiological dynamics to quantify interpersonal interaction, however, has received comparatively little attention. In the present study, we investigate the coordination dynamics of multiple psychophysiological measures and their utility in capturing emotional dynamics in teams. We use data from an experiment where teams of three people built origami boats together in an assembly-line manner while their heart rate, skin conductance, and facial muscle activity were recorded. Our results show that physiological synchrony of skin conductance measures and eletromyographic measures of the corrugator supercilii develops spontaneously among team members during this cooperative production task. Moreover, high team synchrony is found indicative of team cohesion, while low team synchrony is found indicative of a teams' decision to adopt a new behavior across multiple production sessions. We conclude that team-level measures of synchrony offer new and complementary information compared to measures of individual levels of physiological activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.01.004

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 51 triads building origami boats, synchrony of facial muscle activity (smiling) was positively associated with group cohesion.

    “Furthermore, synchrony of skin conductance was associated with group tension and negative affect, whereas synchrony of facial muscle activity (smiling) was positively associated with group cohesion51.”
  • In 51 triads building origami boats, synchrony of skin conductance was associated with group tension and negative affect.

    “Furthermore, synchrony of skin conductance was associated with group tension and negative affect, whereas synchrony of facial muscle activity (smiling) was positively associated with group cohesion51.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mønster, D., Håkonsson, D. D., Eskildsen, J. K., & Wallot, S.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Mønster, Dan
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
156
Pages
24-34
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2229139855
Cited by
134
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3
FWCI
18.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Danish Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (0601-12345B)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
interpersonal dynamics, skin conductance, heart rate, corrugator supercilii, facial muscle activity, team cohesion, behavioral coordination
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cooperative Behavior, Emotions, Female, Group Processes, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Psychophysiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review