The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fetal nuchal translucency: ultrasound screening for fetal trisomy in the first trimester of pregnancy
Abstract
Objective To investigate a new method of screening for fetal trisomies on the basis of maternal age and fetal nuchal translucency thickness at 10 to 13 weeks of gestation. Design A prospective screening study. Setting Tertiary referral centre. Subjects One thousand two hundred and seventy‐three women with singleton pregnancies undergoing first trimester fetal karyotyping because of advanced maternal age, parental anxiety, or family history of a chromosomal abnormality in the absence of balanced parental translocation. Methods Estimates of maternal age‐related risks for fetal trisomies 21, 18 and 13 at this gestation were used to derive the expected incidence of these trisomies in fetuses with nuchal translucency < 3 mm, 3 mm and > 3 mm, respectively, and the ratio of observed to expected number of cases was calculated. Results The nuchal translucency was ≥ 3 mm in 86% of the trisomic and in 4.5% of the chromosomally normal fetuses. The observed number of trisomies in the 1185 cases with nuchal translucency < 3 mm was approximately five times less than the number expected on the basis of maternal age. In the groups with translucency of 3 mm (n= 52) and > 3 mm (n= 36), the observed numbers of trisomies were approximately five times and 24 times higher than the respective numbers expected on the basis of maternal age. Conclusion The risk of fetal trisomy can be derived by combining maternal age and fetal nuchal translucency thickness at 10 to 13 weeks of gestation. It is predicted that for a false positive rate of 5%, the sensitivity of the new method of screening would be at least 85%, which compares favourably with the respective 20 to 30% and 50 to 60% of screening based on maternal age alone or the combination of maternal age with maternal serum biochemistry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nicolaides, K. H., Azar, G., Byrne, D., Mansur, C., & Marks, K. (1992) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.304.6831.867 · Cited by 1,056
Self-citationPrenatal Screening for Down's Syndrome with Use of Maternal Serum Markers
Haddow, J. E., Palomaki, G. E., Knight, G. J., Williams, J., Pulkkinen, A., Canick, J. A., Saller, D. N., & Bowers, G. B. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199208273270902 · Cited by 454
Maternal age‐specific risks for trisomies at 9—14 weeks' gestation
Snijders, R. J. M., Holzgreve, W., Cuckle, H., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1994) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.1970140706 · Cited by 150
Self-citationFirst-trimester simple hygroma: Cause and outcome
Johnson, M. P., Johnson, A., Holzgreve, W., Isada, N. B., Wapner, R. J., Treadwell, M. C., Heeger, S., & Evans, M. I. (1993) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(12)90906-0 · Cited by 132
First-trimester fetal nuchal translucency thickness and risk for trisomies.
Pandya, P. P., Brizot, M. D. L., Kühn, P., Snijders, R. J. M., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1994) · PubMed · Cited by 123
Self-citationDiagnosis and significance of cystic hygroma in the first trimester
Cullen, M. T., Gabrielli, S., Green, J. J., Rizzo, N., Mahoney, M. J., Salafia, C., Bovicelli, L., & Hobbins, J. C. (1990) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.1970101004 · Cited by 114
First‐trimester diagnosis of nuchal anomalies: significance and fetal outcome
Ville, Y. G., Lalondrelle, C., Doumerc, S., Daffos, F., Frydman, R., Oury, J., & Dumez, Y. (1992) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1992.02050314.x · Cited by 96
Fetal Nuchal Oedema: Associated Malformations and Chromosomal Defects
Nicolaides, K. H., Azar, G. B., Snijders, R. J. M., & Gosden, C. M. (2009) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000263659 · Cited by 93
Self-citationNadel, A., Bromley, B., & Benacerraf, B. R. (1994) · Journal of diagnostic medical sonography · doi:10.1177/875647939401000132 · Cited by 90
SHULMAN, L. P., Emerson, D. S., Felker, R. E., Phillips, O. P., Simpson, J. L., & Elias, S. (1992) · PubMed · Cited by 78
Cited by
Snijders, R., Noble, P., Sebire, N., Souka, A., & Nicolaides, K. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11280-6 · Cited by 1,572
Nuchal translucency and other first-trimester sonographic markers of chromosomal abnormalities
Nicolaides, K. H. (2004) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.090 · Cited by 626
Self-citationAutomatic detection and measurement of nuchal translucency
Sciortino, G., Tegolo, D., & Valenti, C. (2017) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.01.008 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Nicolaides, K. H., Brizot, M. L., & Snijders, R. J. M.
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-09
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 782-786
- ISSN
- 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- OpenAlex
- W2003207382
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 24.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fetal nuchal translucency: ultrasound screening for fetal trisomy in the first trimester of pregnancy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb11946.x
- The paper
- Nicolaides, K. H., Brizot, M. L., & Snijders, R. J. M. (1994). Fetal nuchal translucency: ultrasound screening for fetal trisomy in the first trimester of pregnancy. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb11946.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.