Cited by 87Reproductive Health and ContraceptionHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeReproductive Health and Technologies

Economic evaluation of alternative management methods of first-trimester miscarriage based on results from the MIST trial

Petrou, S, Trinder, J, Brocklehurst, P, Smith, L·2006·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the cost-effectiveness of alternative management methods of first-trimester miscarriage. DESIGN: Economic evaluation conducted alongside a large randomised controlled trial (the MIST trial). SETTING: Early pregnancy assessment units of seven participating hospitals in southern England. SAMPLE: A total of 1200 women with a confirmed pregnancy of less than 13 weeks of gestation with a diagnosis of incomplete miscarriage or missed miscarriage. METHODS: Random allocation to expectant management, medical management or surgical management. Collection of health service and broader resource use data, unit costs for each resource item and clinical outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs (pounds, 2001-02 prices) to the health service, social services, women, carers and wider society during the first 8 weeks postrandomisation. Cost-effectiveness estimates, expressed in terms of incremental cost per gynaecological infection prevented; cost-effectiveness acceptability curves presented at alternative willingness-to-pay thresholds for preventing gynaecological infection. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the incidence of gynaecological infection between groups. The net societal cost per woman was estimated at 1086.20 pounds in the expectant group, 1410.40 pounds in the medical group and 1585.30 pounds in the surgical group. Expectant management had a 97.8% probability of being the most cost-effective management method at a willingness-to-pay threshold of 10,000 pounds for preventing one gynaecological infection, while medical management had a 2.2% probability of being the most cost-effective management method. Expectant management retained the highest probability of being the most cost-effective management method at all willingness-to-pay thresholds of less than 70,000 pounds for preventing one gynaecological infection. CONCLUSIONS: Expectant and medical management of first-trimester miscarriage possess significant economic advantages over traditional surgical management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00998.x

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petrou, S., Trinder, J., Brocklehurst, P., & Smith, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • St Michael's Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Petrou, S
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-07-18
Volume
113
Issue
8
Pages
879-889
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W2100147563
Cited by
87
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
first-trimester miscarriage, expectant management, medical management, surgical management, cost-effectiveness, gynecologic infections, missed abortion, incomplete abortion, resource utilization (health care), social costs
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Cost-Benefit Analysis, England, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Prenatal Care, Health Care Costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review