Cited by 63Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementPregnancy and Medication Impact

Glycaemic control throughout pregnancy and risk of pre-eclampsia in women with type I diabetes

Temple, RC, Aldridge, V, Stanley, K, Murphy, HR·2006·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the influence of pre-pregnancy care and its effect on early glycaemic control and also the effect of glycaemic control in later pregnancy on risk of pre-eclampsia in women with type I diabetes. A prospective cohort study of 290 consecutive nonselected pregnancies in women with type I diabetes was performed from 1991 to 2002. We examined the relationship of monthly glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level, pre-pregnancy care, parity, diabetes duration, microvascular complications, maternal age, weight and smoking with risk of pre-eclampsia. Pre-eclampsia developed in 31/243 singleton births (12.8%). HbA1c level at 24 weeks was significantly increased in women with pre-eclampsia compared with women without pre-eclampsia (6.0 versus 5.6%, P= 0.017) and was, after nulliparity, the strongest independent predictor of increased risk (OR 1.65 for each 1% increase in HbA1c; P= 0.01). In contrast, there was no relationship between pre-pregnancy care or HbA1c level at booking and risk of pre-eclampsia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01071.x

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the second and third trimesters, A1C <6% has the lowest risk of large-for-gestational-age infants, preterm delivery, and preeclampsia.

    “In the second and third trimesters, A1C <6% (<42 mmol/mol) has the lowest risk of large-for-gestational-age infants (40,43,44), preterm delivery (45), and preeclampsia (1,46).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Temple, R., Aldridge, V, Stanley, K., & Murphy, H.
Affiliations
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Temple, RC
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-09-27
Volume
113
Issue
11
Pages
1329-1332
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W2009498127
Cited by
63
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Keywords
preeclampsia, type 1 diabetes, glycemic control, glycosylated haemoglobin, HbA1c, pregnancy, preconception care, nulliparity, diabetes duration, microvascular complications, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Pregnancy in Diabetics, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Preconception Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review