Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 320

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative Alterations of Nicotinic and Muscarinic Binding Sites in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Diseases

Aubert, I., Araujo, D. M., Cécyre, D., Robitaille, Y., Gauthier, S., Quirion, R.·1992·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

Abstract:We have recently reported on the differential alterations of various cholinergic markers in cortical and subcortical regions in Alzheimer's disease (AD). The main purpose of the present study was to determine if cholinergic deficits observed in patients with AD are unique to this disorder or can be generalized to others such as idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) and PD with Alzheimer‐type dementia (PD/AD). Muscarinic M 1, M 2, and nicotinic receptor binding parameters (Kd and Bmax) were determined in various cortical and subcortical areas using selective radioligands ([3 H]‐pirenzepine, [3 H]AF‐DX 116, and N[3 H]methylcarbamylcholine). Choline acetyltransferase activity was also determined as a marker of the integrity of cholinergic innervation. Alterations of cholinergic markers are comparable in cortical areas in AD, PD, and PD/AD brains. In frontal and temporal cortices, as well as in the hippocampus, choline acetyltransferase activity and binding capacities of M 2 and nicotinic binding sites are similarly decreased in these three disorders compared with age‐matched control values. M 1 receptor binding parameters are not significantly modified in cortical areas in patients with these disorders. In contrast, important differences between AD and PD brain tissues are found in subcortical areas such as the striatum and the thalamus. The density of M 1 sites is significantly increased in striatal areas only in patients with AD, whereas densities of nicotinic sites are decreased in thalamus and striatum in PD and PD/AD, but not AD, brain tissues. The binding capacity of M 2 sites is apparently unchanged in subcortical areas in all three disorders, although tendencies toward reductions are observed in the striatum of PD and PD/AD patients. Thus, although comparable alterations of various cholinergic markers are observed in cortical areas in the three neurological disorders investigated in the present study, important differences are seen in subcortical areas. This may be relevant to the respective etiological and clinical profiles of AD and PD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1992.tb09752.x

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 78 references

Cited by

See all 320

Metadata

Authors
Aubert, I., Araujo, D. M., Cécyre, D., Robitaille, Y., Gauthier, S., & Quirion, R.
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-02
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
529-541
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W2079402537
Cited by
320
References
78
FWCI
6.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Alterations of Nicotinic and Muscarinic Binding Sites in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Diseases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1992.tb09752.x
The paper
Aubert, I., Araujo, D. M., Cécyre, D., Robitaille, Y., Gauthier, S., & Quirion, R. (1992). Comparative Alterations of Nicotinic and Muscarinic Binding Sites in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Diseases. Journal of Neurochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1992.tb09752.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.