Cited by 86

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interleukin‐1β up‐regulates TACE to enhance α‐cleavage of APP in neurons: resulting decrease in Aβ production

Tachida, Yuriko, Nakagawa, Kazuhiro, Saito, Takashi, Saido, Takaomi C., Honda, Takashi, Saito, Yuko, Murayama, Shigeo, Endo, Tamao, Sakaguchi, Gaku, Kato, Akira, Kitazume, Shinobu, Hashimoto, Yasuhiro·2008·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

The proinflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)‐1β is up‐regulated in microglial cells surrounding amyloid plaques, leading to the hypothesis that IL‐1β is a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease. However, we unexpectedly found that IL‐1β significantly enhanced α‐cleavage, indicated by increases in sAPPα and C83, but reduced β‐cleavage, indicated by decreases in sAPPβ and Aβ40/42, in human neuroblastoma SK‐N‐SH cells. IL‐1β did not significantly alter the mRNA levels of BACE1, ADAM‐9, and ADAM‐10, but up‐regulated that of TACE by threefold. The proform and mature form of TACE protein were also significantly up‐regulated. A TACE inhibitor (TAPI‐2) concomitantly reversed the IL‐1β‐dependent increase in sAPPα and decrease in sAPPβ, suggesting that APP consumption in the α‐cleavage pathway reduced its consumption in the β‐cleavage pathway. IL‐1Ra, a physiological antagonist for the IL‐1 receptor, reversed the effects of IL‐1β, suggesting that the IL‐1β‐dependent up‐regulation of α‐cleavage is mediated by the IL‐1 receptor. IL‐1β also induced this concomitant increase in α‐cleavage and decrease in β‐cleavage in mouse primary cultured neurons. Taken together we conclude that IL‐1β is an anti‐amyloidogenic factor, and that enhancement of its signaling or inhibition of IL‐1Ra activity could represent potential therapeutic strategies against Alzheimer’s disease.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.05127.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 10.1038/35094583 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/jnr.10737 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0065-2776(08)60535-0 · DOI
  4. 10.1172/JCI114622 · DOI
  5. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.16.1.27 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1002/jnr.20864 · DOI
  7. 10.1074/jbc.273.43.27765 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/34910 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1182/blood.V87.6.2095.bloodjournal8762095 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1996.67051882.x · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0140-6736(91)92725-H · DOI
  12. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a003040 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/0-387-23226-5_5 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.96.7.3922 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1002/jnr.20515 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb07824.x · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0197-4580(01)00287-1 · DOI
  18. 10.1073/pnas.95.21.12683 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01661-1 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90301-1 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.2.741 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.01.022 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1002/neu.1064 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/19077 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tachida, Y., Nakagawa, K., Saito, T., Saido, T. C., Honda, T., Saito, Y., Murayama, S., Endo, T., Sakaguchi, G., Kato, A., Kitazume, S., & Hashimoto, Y.
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-11-16
Volume
104
Issue
5
Pages
1387-1393
ISSN
  • 0022-3042
  • 1471-4159
Cited by
86
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review