Cited by 31

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Acute spinal cord injury persistently reduces R/G RNA editing of AMPA receptors

Barbon, Alessandro, Fumagalli, Fabio, Caracciolo, Luca, Madaschi, Laura, Lesma, Elena, Mora, Cristina, Carelli, Stephana, Slotkin, Theodore A., Racagni, Giorgio, Di Giulio, Anna Maria, Gorio, Alfredo, Barlati, Sergio·2010·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

J. Neurochem.(2010)114, 397–407. Spinal cord injury (SCI) triggers a complex ischemic and inflammatory reaction, involving activation of neurotransmitter systems, in particular glutamate, culminating in cell death. We hypothesized that SCI might lead to alteration in the RNA editing of α‐amino‐3‐hydroxy‐5‐methyl‐4‐isoxazolepropionate (AMPA) receptors that govern critical determinants of neuronal survival. To this end, we examined the molecular changes set in motion by SCI that affect the channel properties of AMPA receptors. SCI strongly reduced the level of AMPA receptor R/G editing, involving not only the site of the lesion but also adjacent areas of the cord spared by the lesion. The effects, with changes for some subunits and loci, were observed as long as 30 days after lesioning and may correlate with a partial decrease in enzymatic activity of adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 2 (ADAR2), as deduced from the analysis of ADAR2 self‐editing. The reduced editing at the R/G site of glutamate receptor subunits (GluRs) is likely to reduce post‐synaptic excitatory responses to glutamate, thus limiting the progression of cell death; however, prolonged suppression of GluR function in later stages may hinder synaptic plasticity. These observations provide the first direct evidence of the potential contribution of RNA editing to excitatory neural injury and recovery after SCI.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06767.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.04.017 · DOI
  2. 10.1017/S1355838200991921 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0169-328X(03)00317-6 · DOI
  4. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.110601.135501 · DOI
  5. 10.1089/neu.1995.12.1 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.devbrainres.2004.06.001 · DOI
  7. 10.1242/jcs.00371 · DOI
  8. 10.1091/mbc.E05-06-0536 · DOI
  9. Dingledine R., 1999, The glutamate receptor ion channels, Pharmacol. Rev., 51, 7, 10.1016/S0031-6997(24)01394-2 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1093/hmg/ddp137 · DOI
  11. 10.1073/pnas.90.2.755 · DOI
  12. 10.1006/exnr.1994.1157 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/ana.410230618 · DOI
  14. 10.1089/neu.1988.5.33 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/0014-2999(90)90227-W · DOI
  16. 10.1128/MCB.26.2.480-488.2006 · DOI
  17. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3708-08.2008 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)57016-5 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0014-4886(89)80004-4 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18203.x · DOI
  21. 10.1073/pnas.0508479102 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00693-1 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00668-8 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02799-2 · DOI
  25. Grossman S. D., 1999, Alterations in AMPA receptor subunit expression after experimental spinal cord contusion injury, J. Neurosci., 19, 5711, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-14-05711.1999 · DOI
  26. 10.1006/exnr.2001.7629 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/jnr.21379 · DOI
  28. 10.1146/annurev.ne.17.030194.000335 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1159/000210185 · DOI
  31. 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020812 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/427801a · DOI
  33. 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01841.x · DOI
  34. 10.1007/s00109-004-0599-z · DOI
  35. 10.1073/pnas.93.5.1797 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1016/j.tins.2007.01.006 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1074/jbc.271.21.12221 · DOI
  38. 10.1073/pnas.251531398 · DOI
  39. 10.1074/jbc.R200025200 · DOI
  40. 10.1126/science.1113150 · DOI
  41. 10.1074/jbc.271.50.31795 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/S0301-0082(97)00055-5 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90176-Z · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1093/nar/30.9.e36 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02169-7 · DOI
  46. 10.1002/glia.20096 · DOI
  47. 10.1038/19992 · DOI
  48. 10.1261/rna.404407 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00760-2 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/S0165-0173(97)00062-3 · DOI
  51. 10.1097/00006123-199701000-00037 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/S0378-1119(02)01016-8 · DOI
  53. 10.1126/science.1699275 · DOI
  54. 10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021295 · DOI
  55. 10.1186/1756-6606-2-13 · DOI
  56. 10.1083/jcb.200411129 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.nbd.2003.11.006 · DOI
  58. 10.1101/gr.089409.108 · DOI
  59. 10.1017/S135583820101007X · DOI
  60. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-11-06598.1994 · DOI
  61. 10.1006/exnr.1996.0012 · DOI
  62. 10.1074/jbc.M308612200 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Barbon, A., Fumagalli, F., Caracciolo, L., Madaschi, L., Lesma, E., Mora, C., Carelli, S., Slotkin, T. A., Racagni, G., Di Giulio, A. M., Gorio, A., & Barlati, S.
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-06-22
Volume
114
Issue
2
Pages
397-407
ISSN
  • 0022-3042
  • 1471-4159
Cited by
31
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review