The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Acute spinal cord injury persistently reduces R/G RNA editing of AMPA receptors
Abstract
J. Neurochem.(2010)114, 397–407. Spinal cord injury (SCI) triggers a complex ischemic and inflammatory reaction, involving activation of neurotransmitter systems, in particular glutamate, culminating in cell death. We hypothesized that SCI might lead to alteration in the RNA editing of α‐amino‐3‐hydroxy‐5‐methyl‐4‐isoxazolepropionate (AMPA) receptors that govern critical determinants of neuronal survival. To this end, we examined the molecular changes set in motion by SCI that affect the channel properties of AMPA receptors. SCI strongly reduced the level of AMPA receptor R/G editing, involving not only the site of the lesion but also adjacent areas of the cord spared by the lesion. The effects, with changes for some subunits and loci, were observed as long as 30 days after lesioning and may correlate with a partial decrease in enzymatic activity of adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 2 (ADAR2), as deduced from the analysis of ADAR2 self‐editing. The reduced editing at the R/G site of glutamate receptor subunits (GluRs) is likely to reduce post‐synaptic excitatory responses to glutamate, thus limiting the progression of cell death; however, prolonged suppression of GluR function in later stages may hinder synaptic plasticity. These observations provide the first direct evidence of the potential contribution of RNA editing to excitatory neural injury and recovery after SCI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms contribute to orchestrating these gene expression changes [10,11].”
From MicroRNA-138-5p Targets Pro-Apoptotic Factors and Favors Neural Cell Survival: Analysis in the Injured Spinal Cord (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Control of Kinetic Properties of AMPA Receptor Channels by Nuclear RNA Editing
Lomeli, H., Mosbacher, J., Melcher, T., Höger, T., Geiger, J. R. P., Kuner, T., Monyer, H., Higuchi, M., Bach, A., & Seeburg, P. H. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7992055 · Cited by 746
Chapter 6 Glutamate receptors and the induction of excitotoxic neuronal death
Choi, D. W. (1994) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(08)60767-0 · Cited by 385
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.04.017 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1355838200991921 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0169-328X(03)00317-6 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.110601.135501 · DOI
- 10.1089/neu.1995.12.1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.devbrainres.2004.06.001 · DOI
- 10.1242/jcs.00371 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.E05-06-0536 · DOI
- Dingledine R., 1999, The glutamate receptor ion channels, Pharmacol. Rev., 51, 7, 10.1016/S0031-6997(24)01394-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/hmg/ddp137 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.90.2.755 · DOI
- 10.1006/exnr.1994.1157 · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.410230618 · DOI
- 10.1089/neu.1988.5.33 · DOI
- 10.1016/0014-2999(90)90227-W · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.26.2.480-488.2006 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3708-08.2008 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)57016-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0014-4886(89)80004-4 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18203.x · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0508479102 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00693-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00668-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02799-2 · DOI
- Grossman S. D., 1999, Alterations in AMPA receptor subunit expression after experimental spinal cord contusion injury, J. Neurosci., 19, 5711, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-14-05711.1999 · DOI
- 10.1006/exnr.2001.7629 · DOI
- 10.1002/jnr.21379 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.ne.17.030194.000335 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159/000210185 · DOI
- 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020812 · DOI
- 10.1038/427801a · DOI
- 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01841.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s00109-004-0599-z · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.93.5.1797 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.tins.2007.01.006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.271.21.12221 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.251531398 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.R200025200 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1113150 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.271.50.31795 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0301-0082(97)00055-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90176-Z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/30.9.e36 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02169-7 · DOI
- 10.1002/glia.20096 · DOI
- 10.1038/19992 · DOI
- 10.1261/rna.404407 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00760-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0165-0173(97)00062-3 · DOI
- 10.1097/00006123-199701000-00037 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0378-1119(02)01016-8 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1699275 · DOI
- 10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021295 · DOI
- 10.1186/1756-6606-2-13 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.200411129 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nbd.2003.11.006 · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.089409.108 · DOI
- 10.1017/S135583820101007X · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-11-06598.1994 · DOI
- 10.1006/exnr.1996.0012 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M308612200 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Maza, R. M., Barreda-Manso, M. A., Reigada, D., Silván, Á., Muñoz-Galdeano, T., Soto, A., del Águila, Á., & Nieto-Díaz, M. (2022) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines10071559 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Barbon, A., Fumagalli, F., Caracciolo, L., Madaschi, L., Lesma, E., Mora, C., Carelli, S., Slotkin, T. A., Racagni, G., Di Giulio, A. M., Gorio, A., & Barlati, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-06-22
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 397-407
- ISSN
- 0022-3042
- 1471-4159
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review