Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is muscle power output a key factor in the age‐related decline in physical performance? A comparison of muscle cross section, chair‐rising test and jumping power

Runge, Martin, Rittweger, Jörn, Russo, Cosimo Roberto, Schiessl, Hans, Felsenberg, Dieter·2004·Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging

Abstract

Summary: Ageing compromises locomotor capacity and is associated with an increased risk of falls. Several lines of evidence indicate that both changes in muscle mass and performance are causative. Most studies, however, do not discern between effects of ageing, sedentarism and comorbidity. The present study compares the age effects in muscle cross section, force and power in physically competent self‐selected subjects of different age groups. A total of 169 women and 89 men between 18 and 88 years, without any disease, impairment or medication affecting the musculoskeletal system were enrolled in this study. Calf muscle cross‐sectional area was assessed by computed tomography. Muscle force and power were assessed by jumping mechanography. No significant correlation between muscle cross section and age was found in the men. A weak correlation in the women disappeared after correction for height. Close correlations with age, however, were found for peak force and peak power. Correction for muscle cross section or body weight further increased these correlation coefficients, particularly for peak power specific to body weight (r = 0.81 in women and r = 0.86 in men). The non‐sedentarian population investigated here depicted a reduction of >50% between the age of 20 and 80 without a reduction in muscle cross section. This suggests a crucial role for muscular power in the ageing process. Possibly, the jumping mechanography as a measurement of anti‐gravitational power output is a promising extension of the chair‐rising test, known to be predictive for immobilization and the risk of falls.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-097x.2004.00567.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Runge, M., Rittweger, J., Russo, C. R., Schiessl, H., & Felsenberg, D.
Venue
Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-11
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
335-340
ISSN
  • 1475-0961 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-097X
OpenAlex
W2131944079
Cited by
267
References
6
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.