The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Screening Efficiency of the Child Behavior Checklist and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Objective: Assess the screening efficiency of the caretaker‐report CBCL and SDQ in community and clinical samples using published data. Methods: PyschInfo, Medline, and EMBASE were systematically searched to identify studies with appropriate efficiency data. Estimates of sensitivity and specificity were extracted from identified studies and used to generate summary likelihood ratio estimates on which the scales were compared. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated with respect to a ‘true’ diagnosis to compare scales. Results: A total of 29 and 3 studies met inclusion criteria for CBCL and SDQ respectively. Summary estimates of the likelihood ratios for domains assessed by CBCL ranged from 3.86 (2.23, 6.69) to 4.87 (2.90, 8.18); and for SDQ from 5.02 (1.61, 15.63) to 8.32 (2.72, 25.48). Heterogeneity was low. For total problems, the SDQ caretaker‐report was found to be most specific (0.93, 95% CI 0.92, 0.94) and the CBCL caretaker‐report to be most sensitive (0.66, 95%CI 0.60, 0.73). Conclusions: This meta‐analysis supports continued use of the CBCL and SDQ via caretaker‐report in clinical and community samples. Additional research is required to determine if there is a true difference in efficiency between the two scales.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note
Goodman, R. (1997) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x · Cited by 14,908
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Higgins, J. P. T., Green, S., & Ben Van Den, A. (2020) · International Coaching Psychology Review · doi:10.53841/bpsicpr.2020.15.2.123 · Cited by 5,670
The Prevalence of DSM-III-R Diagnoses in a National Sample of Dutch Adolescents
Verhulst, F. C. (1997) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830160049008 · Cited by 554
Questionnaire screening for mental health problems in Bangladeshi children: a preliminary study
Mullick, M. S. I., & Goodman, R. (2001) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s001270050295 · Cited by 189
Remissions in Maternal Depression and Child Psychopathology: A STAR*D-Child Report
Weissman, M. M., Pilowsky, D. J., Wickramaratne, P. J., Talati, A., Wisniewski, S. R., Fava, M., Hughes, C. W., Garber, J., Malloy, E., King, C. A., et al. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.12.1389 · Cited by 9
Cited by
Mazefsky, C. A., Anderson, R., Conner, C. M., & Minshew, N. (2011) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-010-9198-1 · Cited by 127
Curran, E. A., Cryan, J. F., Kenny, L. C., Dinan, T. G., Kearney, P. M., & Khashan, A. S. (2016) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-015-2616-1 · Cited by 94
Nagata, J. M., Al-Shoaibi, A. A. A., Leong, A. W., Zamora, G., Testa, A., Ganson, K. T., & Baker, F. C. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-024-20102-x · Cited by 103
“The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), one of the most widely used and investigated tools for detecting emotional and behavioral symptoms in children and adolescents [30], provides a dimensional assessment of child psychopathology [31].”
BackgroundBabinski, D. E., Kujawa, A., Kessel, E. M., Arfer, K. B., & Klein, D. N. (2019) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10802-018-0470-2 · Cited by 58
Robinson, M., McLean, N. J., Oddy, W. H., Mattes, E., Bulsara, M., Li, J., Zubrick, S. R., Stanley, F. J., & Newnham, J. P. (2010) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2009.088658 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Warnick, E. M., Bracken, M. B., & Kasl, S.
- Venue
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-08-11
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 140-147
- ISSN
- 1475-357X (ISSN-L)
- 1475-3588
- OpenAlex
- W2030797571
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 2.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
