Cited by 73Electronic Health Records SystemsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeTechnology and Human Factors in Education and Health

Cost-effectiveness of an electronic medical record based clinical decision support system

Open access
Gilmer, Todd P., O'Connor, Patrick J., Sperl‐Hillen, JoAnn M., Rush, William A., Johnson, Paul E., Amundson, Gerald H., Asche, Stephen E., Ekstrom, Heidi L.·2012·Health Services Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Medical groups have invested billions of dollars in electronic medical records (EMRs), but few studies have examined the cost-effectiveness of EMR-based clinical decision support (CDS). This study examined the cost-effectiveness of EMR-based CDS for adults with diabetes from the perspective of the health care system. DATA SOURCES/SETTING: Clinical outcome and cost data from a randomized clinical trial of EMR-based CDS were used as inputs into a diabetes simulation model. The simulation cohort included 1,092 patients with diabetes with A1c above goal at baseline. STUDY DESIGN: The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model, a validated simulation model of diabetes, was used to evaluate remaining life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and health care costs over patient lifetimes (40-year time horizon) from the health system perspective. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Patients in the intervention group had significantly lowered A1c (0.26 percent, p = .014) relative to patients in the control arm. Intervention costs were $120 (SE = 45) per patient in the first year and $76 (SE = 45) per patient in the following years. In the base case analysis, EMR-based CDS increased lifetime QALYs by 0.04 (SE = 0.01) and increased lifetime costs by $112 (SE = 660), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $3,017 per QALY. The cost-effectiveness of EMR-based CDS persisted in one-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Widespread adoption of sophisticated EMR-based CDS has the potential to modestly improve the quality of care for patients with chronic conditions without substantially increasing costs to the health care system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01427.x

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gilmer, T. P., O'Connor, P. J., Sperl‐Hillen, J. M., Rush, W. A., Johnson, P. E., Amundson, G. H., Asche, S. E., & Ekstrom, H. L.
Affiliations
  • Health Partners Research Foundation Bloomington MN
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Gilmer, Todd P.
Venue
Health Services Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-11
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
2137-2158
ISSN
  • 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-6773
OpenAlex
W2063517554
Cited by
73
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK068314, R01DK068314)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
Keywords
electronic health records, clinical decision support, cost-effectiveness, diabetes mellitus, glycemic control, HbA1c, quality-adjusted life years, health care costs, quality of care
MeSH terms
Aged, Computer Simulation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Diabetes Mellitus, Health Expenditures, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Health Care, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Diabetes Complications, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review