The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does Corporate Transparency Contribute to Efficient Resource Allocation?
Abstract
This paper examines whether a country's corporate transparency environment, which includes the quality of accounting information, contributes to efficient resource allocation. Based on a cross‐country study of 37 manufacturing industries in 37 countries, we provide three pieces of related evidence. First, we find the contemporaneous correlations in industry growth rates across country pairs are higher when there is a greater level of corporate transparency in the country pairs, after controlling for country‐level economic and financial development. Second, we find the influence of transparency on these correlations is stronger when country pairs are at similar levels of economic development (GDP). Finally, when we control for the level of transparency explained by a country's institutions in place, we find that residual transparency (unexplained by country‐level factors) is associated with industry‐specific growth rates. Taken together, the results are consistent with corporate transparency facilitating the allocation of resources across industry sectors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Legal Determinants of External Finance
LA PORTA, R., LOPEZ‐DE‐SILANES, F., SHLEIFER, A., & VISHNY, R. W. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02727.x · Cited by 9,783
The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.91.5.1369 · Cited by 8,517
Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring
Diamond, D. W. (1984) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297430 · Cited by 8,476 · cited 1×
“Given this backdrop, extant theory suggests that financial institutions emerge to economize on information costs (Diamond 1984, Boyd and Prescott 1986, and Levine 1997).”
Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have InformationThat Investors Do Not Have
Myers, S., & Majluf, N. (1984) · doi:10.3386/w1396 · Cited by 6,745
Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302753399436 · Cited by 3,956
Financial Intermediary-Coalitions
Boyd, J. H., & Prescott, E. C. (1985) · doi:10.21034/sr.87 · Cited by 1,440
Financial development, property rights, and growth
Claessens, S., & Laeven, L. (2003) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1046/j.1540-6261.2003.00610.x · Cited by 338
Cited by
LEUZ, C., & WYSOCKI, P. D. (2016) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1475-679x.12115 · Cited by 1,760
Auditor Style and Financial Statement Comparability
Francis, J. R., Pinnuck, M., & Watanabe, O. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2287631 · Cited by 369
Self-citationA Review of Corporate Reporting Transparency Quality: Current Status and Future Directions
Hewage, Y. M., Cooray, A., & Ahmed, R. (2026) · Australian Accounting Review · doi:10.1111/auar.70019 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- FRANCIS, J. R., HUANG, S., KHURANA, I. K., & PEREIRA, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Accounting Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-07-16
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 943-989
- ISSN
- 0021-8456 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-679X
- OpenAlex
- W2130173030
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 28.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does Corporate Transparency Contribute to Efficient Resource Allocation? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2009.00340.x
- The paper
- FRANCIS, J. R., HUANG, S., KHURANA, I. K., & PEREIRA, R. (2009). Does Corporate Transparency Contribute to Efficient Resource Allocation? Journal of Accounting Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2009.00340.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.