The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size
Abstract
Three studies evaluated the reliability and validity of the Investment Model Scale, an instrument designed to measure four constructs, including commitment level and three bases of dependence–satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. In all three studies, reliability analyses revealed good internal consistency among items designed to measure each construct. Also, principal components analyses performed on scale items revealed evidence of four factors, with items designed to measure each construct loading on independent factors. Studies 2 and 3 examined associations of model variables with instruments measuring diverse qualities of relationships and assorted personal dispositions. As anticipated, Investment Model variables were moderately associated with other measures reflecting superior couple functioning (e.g., dyadic adjustment, trust level, inclusion of other in the self), and were essentially unrelated to measures assessing personal dispositions (e.g., need for cognition, self‐esteem). In addition, Study 3 demonstrated that earlier measures of Investment Model variables predicted later levels of dyadic adjustment and later relationship status (persisted vs. ended). It is hoped that the existence of a reliable and valid Investment Model Scale will promote further research regarding commitment and interdependence in ongoing close relationships.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596 · Cited by 5,157
Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.95 · Cited by 3,146
A Collective Self-Esteem Scale: Self-Evaluation of One’s Social Identity
Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167292183006 · Cited by 3,057
Knee-deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action
Staw, B. M. (1976) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90005-2 · Cited by 2,061 · cited 1×
“Investment size refers to the magnitude and importance of the resources that are attached to a relationship-resources that would decline in value or be lost if the relationship were to end (cf. Becker, 1960; Rubin & Brockner, 1975; Staw, 1976; Teger, 1980;Tropper, 1972).”
BackgroundThe Escalation of Commitment To a Course of Action
Staw, B. M. (1981) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1981.4285694 · Cited by 1,693
Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys
Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (1986) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/352033 · Cited by 1,592
Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships.
Agnew, C. R., Van Lange, P. A. M., Rusbult, C. E., & Langston, C. A. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.939 · Cited by 718
Self-citationSpousal Alternatives and Marital Dissolution
South, S. J., & Lloyd, K. M. (1995) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2096343 · Cited by 305
Research works printed but not linked: 71
- 10.1086/222820 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.ps.45.020194.000455 · DOI · Paper page
- Berscheid E., 1998, Handbook of social psychology, 193
- 10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.792 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.792 · Paper page
- Brickman P., 1987, Commitment, conflict, and caring, 145
- 10.1177/01461672962212005 · DOI
- 10.1521/jscp.1987.5.3.271 · DOI
- Cohen J., 1983, Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences
- 10.2307/2787013 · DOI
- 10.2307/2683203 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.62.1.62 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.1.62 · Paper page
- 10.1300/J082v12n02_01 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.460 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.460
- 10.1016/0030-5073(81)90016-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2786866 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/351830 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1976.tb02485.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-1-4899-0429-4_12 · DOI
- Holmes J. G., 1989, Review of personality and social psychology, 187
- 10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.67 · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.59.1.67
- 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.967 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.967 · Paper page
- Johnson M. P., 1991, Advances in personal relationships, 117
- 10.2307/2092438 · DOI · Paper page
- Kelley H. H., 1979, Personal relationships: Their structures and processes
- Kelley H. H., 1983, Close relationships, 265
- Kelley H. H., 1983, Close relationships
- Kelley H. H., 1978, Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence
- 10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.910 · DOI
- Kurdek L. A., 1993, Predicting marital dissolution: A five‐year prospective longitudinal study of newly‐wed couples, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 221, 10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.221 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.221 · Paper page
- Leik R. K., 1976, Behavioral theory in sociology, 299
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-443201-7.50006-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-143550-9.50012-4 · DOI
- 10.1177/0265407595121002 · DOI
- 10.1177/0265407585021001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-9010.69.3.372 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.3.372 · Paper page
- Mowday R. T., 1982, Employee‐organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover
- 10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.707 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.707 · Paper page
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-590241-0.50006-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/h0076937 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/h0029841 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0022-1031(80)90007-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Rusbult C. E., 1980, Satisfaction and commitment in friendships, Representative Research in Social Psychology, 11, 96
- 10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.101 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.101 · Paper page
- Rusbult C. E., 1987, Readings in social psychology: Classic and contemporary contributions, 147
- 10.1017/CBO9780511527814.005 · DOI
- 10.1177/026540759301000202 · DOI · Paper page
- Rusbult C. E., 1994, Communication and relational maintenance, 115
- 10.1037/0021-9010.68.3.429 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.68.3.429 · Paper page
- 10.2307/2786859 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.605 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.605
- 10.1177/0146167295216002 · DOI · Paper page
- Rusbult C. E., 1998, Unpublished manuscript
- 10.1037/0022-3514.60.1.53 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.1.53 · Paper page
- Rusbult C. E., Commitment in close personal relationships: Theory and research
- 10.2307/352336 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167283094002 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.683 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.683 · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1192 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1192 · Paper page
- 10.2307/350547 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0033-2909.104.2.236 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.104.2.236 · Paper page
- 10.2307/351791 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1207/s15327906mbr2301_2 · DOI
- Teger A. I., 1980, Too much invested to quit
- 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400327 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/002200277201600107 · doi:10.1177/002200277201600107
- Lange P. A. M., 1997, From game theory to real life: How social value orientation affects willingness to sacrifice in ongoing relationships, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1333
- 10.1177/0146167295211005 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1373 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1373 · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.36.1.82 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.39.4.660 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.4.660
- Wieselquist J., 1998, Unpublished manuscript
Cited by
Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3 · Cited by 5,758
A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships
Feeney, B. C., & Collins, N. L. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868314544222 · Cited by 1,521
A Multicomponent Conceptualization of Authenticity: Theory and Research
Kernis, M. H., & Goldman, B. M. (2006) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)38006-9 · Cited by 1,244
Fraley, R. C., Heffernan, M. E., Vicary, A. M., & Brumbaugh, C. C. (2011) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0022898 · Cited by 1,198
The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: a meta-analysis
Capaldi, C. A., Dopko, R. L., & Zelenski, J. M. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976 · Cited by 1,183
“…theory (Rusbult and Arriaga, 2000), Davis et al. (2009) defined commitment to nature as a “psychological attachment to and long-term orientation toward the natural world” (p. 174) and adapted the commitment scale by Rusbult et al. (1998) which originally assessed commitment to a close partner.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- RUSBULT, C. E., MARTZ, J. M., & AGNEW, C. R.
- Venue
- Personal Relationships
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 357-387
- ISSN
- 1350-4126 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-6811
- OpenAlex
- W1984743820
- Cited by
- 2,161
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 17.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
- The paper
- RUSBULT, C. E., MARTZ, J. M., & AGNEW, C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.