Cited by 738Economics of Agriculture and Food MarketsMarket Dynamics and VolatilityAgricultural economics and policies

How to understand high food prices

Gilbert, Christopher L.·2010·Journal of Agricultural Economics

Abstract

Agricultural price booms are better explained by common factors than by market‐specific factors such as supply shocks. A capital asset pricing model‐type model shows why one should expect this and Granger causality analysis establishes the role of demand growth, monetary expansion and exchange rate movements in explaining price movements over the period since 1971. The demand for grains and oilseeds as biofuel feedstocks has been cited as the main cause of the price rise, but there is little direct evidence for this contention. Instead, index‐based investment in agricultural futures markets is seen as the major channel through which macroeconomic and monetary factors generated the 2007–2008 food price rises.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00248.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The financialization of the food system, driven by investment funds, fuels speculative trading, particularly through ETFs and Commodity Index Funds (CIFs).

    “The financialization of the food system, driven by investment funds like those cited by Gilbert (2010), Kerckhoffs et al. (2010) and Clapp (2019), fuels speculative trading, particularly through ETFs and Commodity Index Funds (CIFs).”
  • The link between the financialization of food and investment funds associated with agri-food companies allows us to argue for the recurrent existence of speculative operations through these instruments, particularly ETFs and Commodity Index Funds (CIFs).

    “As we have noted, the link between the financialization of food and investment funds associated with agri-food companies (Gilbert 2010; Kerckhoffs et al. 2010; Clapp 2019) allows us to argue for the recurrent existence of speculative operations through these instruments, particularly ETFs and the operation of Commodity Index Funds (CIFs).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gilbert, C. L.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Gilbert, Christopher L.
Venue
Journal of Agricultural Economics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-05-13
Volume
61
Issue
2
Pages
398-425
ISSN
  • 0021-857X (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9552
OpenAlex
W2100000398
Cited by
738
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 47
FWCI
130.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Agricultural Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Market Dynamics and Volatility
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
Keywords
food prices, common factors, supply shocks, capital asset pricing model, Granger causality, demand growth, monetary easing, exchange rate movements, biofuel feedstock, agricultural futures markets, 2007-2008 food price crisis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review