Cited by 72Social and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchRace, History, and American Society

Perceptions of Racism in Hurricane Katrina: A Liberation Psychology Analysis

Adams, Glenn, O’Brien, Laurie T., Nelson, Jessica C.·2006·Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy

Abstract

Poll data showed that African Americans perceived more racism in the response to Hurricane Katrina than did White Americans. In this article, we consider claims about racism in Katrina‐related events in light of (a) our program of experimental research on group differences in perception of racism and (b) the meta‐theoretical perspective of Liberation Psychology (LP). First, this analysis suggests that White Americans may perceive less racism in the Katrina disaster because they are less likely than African Americans to know about historically documented acts of past racism (e.g., following the Mississippi flood of 1927). Second, group differences may arise because African Americans and White Americans face divergent motivations regarding perception of racism. Whereas African Americans may have motivations to be vigilant for the possibility of racism, White Americans may be motivated to deny racism because it constitutes a threat to social identity and to the legitimacy of the status quo.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2006.00112.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disempowered groups may use conspiracy theories by fostering solidarity and collective action.

    “and by fostering solidarity and collective action (Adams, O’Brien, & Nelson, 2006).”

    From The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories (2017) · cites this paper as Adams, O’Brien, & Nelson, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adams, G., O’Brien, L. T., & Nelson, J. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • Tulane University (US)
Corresponding author
Adams, Glenn
Venue
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-12
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
215-235
ISSN
  • 1529-7489 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-2415
OpenAlex
W2109675882
Cited by
72
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
15.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
Keywords
Hurricane Katrina, liberation psychology, African Americans, White Americans, group differences, social identity threat, denial of racism, historical racism, disaster response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review