Perceptions of Racism in Hurricane Katrina: A Liberation Psychology Analysis
Abstract
Poll data showed that African Americans perceived more racism in the response to Hurricane Katrina than did White Americans. In this article, we consider claims about racism in Katrina‐related events in light of (a) our program of experimental research on group differences in perception of racism and (b) the meta‐theoretical perspective of Liberation Psychology (LP). First, this analysis suggests that White Americans may perceive less racism in the Katrina disaster because they are less likely than African Americans to know about historically documented acts of past racism (e.g., following the Mississippi flood of 1927). Second, group differences may arise because African Americans and White Americans face divergent motivations regarding perception of racism. Whereas African Americans may have motivations to be vigilant for the possibility of racism, White Americans may be motivated to deny racism because it constitutes a threat to social identity and to the legitimacy of the status quo.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Disempowered groups may use conspiracy theories by fostering solidarity and collective action.
“and by fostering solidarity and collective action (Adams, O’Brien, & Nelson, 2006).”
From The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories (2017) · cites this paper as Adams, O’Brien, & Nelson, 2006
Cites
Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013 · Cited by 1,793 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Most of this research has emphasized how people who eschew explicit prejudice and consciously strive to act in a nonoppressive manner can still perpetrate subtle forms of “modern” bias that operate without intention or awareness (e.g., Fazio, Jackson, Dunton, & Williams, 1995; Greenwald McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998; Henke…”
BackgroundSubjective Construal, Social Inference, and Human Misunderstanding
Griffin, D. W., & Ross, L. (1991) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60333-0 · Cited by 404 · see citing works
Psychological science in cultural context
Gergen, K. J., Gulerce, A., Lock, A., & Misra, G. (1996) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.51.5.496 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R., Broadnax, S., & Blaine, B. E. (1999) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672992511003 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
The detrimental effects of a suggestion of sexism in an instruction situation
Adams, G., Garcia, D. M., Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Steele, C. M. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.10.004 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories
Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721417718261 · Cited by 1,316 · see citing works
The psychological impacts of global climate change
Doherty, T. J., & Clayton, S. (2011) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0023141 · Cited by 894 · see citing works
- Authors
- Adams, G., O’Brien, L. T., & Nelson, J. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas (US)
- Tulane University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Adams, Glenn
- Venue
- Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 215-235
- ISSN
- 1529-7489 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-2415
- OpenAlex
- W2109675882
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 15.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Keywords
- Hurricane Katrina, liberation psychology, African Americans, White Americans, group differences, social identity threat, denial of racism, historical racism, disaster response
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review