Cited by 123Social and Intergroup PsychologyGender and Feminist StudiesCareer Development and Diversity

The detrimental effects of a suggestion of sexism in an instruction situation

Adams, Glenn, Garcia, Donna M., Purdie-Vaughns, Valerie, Steele, Claude M.·2006·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.10.004

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cues to stereotype threat range from blatant exposure to gender stereotypes to subtle activation.

    “Cues to stereotype threat can come in many forms ranging from more blatant and explicit exposure to gender stereotypes, such as telling participants that their experimenter is sexist or having them interact with a sexist man (Adams et al., 2006;Logel et al., 2009), to more subtle activation, such as simply asking someone to perform in a domain where there is a well-known stereotype”

    From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Adams et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adams, G., Garcia, D. M., Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Steele, C. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Adams, Glenn
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-09
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
602-615
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019451974
Cited by
122
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
10.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
sexism, social identity threat, instructor competence, gender stereotypes, institutional discrimination, gender differences in performance, perceived discrimination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review