Cited by 102Environmental Impact and SustainabilityBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationBuilding energy efficiency and sustainability

Transforming the Norwegian Dwelling Stock to Reach the 2 Degrees Celsius Climate Target: Combining Material Flow Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment Techniques

Open access
Pauliuk, Stefan, Sjöstrand, Karin, Müller, Daniel B.·2013·Journal of Industrial Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Residential buildings account for about one‐third of the final energy demand in Norway. Many cost‐effective measures for reducing heat losses in buildings are known, and their implementation may make the building sector one of the largest contributors to climate change mitigation. To determine the sectoral emission reduction potential, we model a complete transformation of the dwelling stock by 2050 by applying both renovation and reconstruction with different energy standards. We propose a new dynamic stock model with an optimization routine to identify and prioritize buildings with the highest energy saving potential. We combine material flow analysis (MFA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) techniques to extend the sectoral boundary beyond direct household emissions. Despite an expected population growth of almost 50% between 2000 and 2050, sectoral carbon emissions in that period may drop between 30% and 40% for scenarios where the stock is completely transformed by either reconstruction or renovation to the passive house standard. Due to its lower upstream impact, renovation leads to a lower sectoral carbon footprint than reconstruction. Full transformation, however, is not sufficient to achieve an emissions reduction of 50% or more, as required on average to limit global warming to 2 degrees Celsius, because hot water generation, appliances, and lighting will dominate the sectoral footprint once the stock has been transformed. A first estimate of the additional impact of realistic energy efficiency and lifestyle changes in the nonheating part of the sector reveals a maximal total reduction potential of about 75%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00571.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pauliuk, S., Sjöstrand, K., & Müller, D. B.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Pauliuk, Stefan
Venue
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Published
2013-01-18
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
542-554
ISSN
  • 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9290
OpenAlex
W1922065933
Cited by
102
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Industrial Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building energy efficiency and sustainability
Keywords
residential buildings, building energy efficiency, Reconstruction, passive house standard, building carbon emissions, climate change mitigation, material flow analysis, life cycle assessment, hot water production, lifestyle modification, Norway

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review