Cited by 194Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionFrailty in Older AdultsNutrition and Health in Aging

Reliability of the 400-m usual pace walk test as an assessment of mobility limitation in older adults

Open access
Rolland, Yves M., Cesari, Matteo, Miller, Michael E., Penninx, Brenda W., Atkinson, Hal H., Pahor, Marco·2004·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the test‐retest reliability of the 400‐m usual‐pace walk test (400‐MWT), and to determine whether the 4‐m walk test predicts inability to walk 400 m. Design: Observational. Setting: Community, 20‐m tract course. Participants: Sixty study participants (aged≥65) were enrolled from the community and met the following eligibility criteria: self‐reported difficulty in two or more of four functional domains (mobility and exercise tolerance, upper extremity function, basic self‐care, higher functional tasks of independent living) and a score of 18 or higher on the Mini‐Mental State Examination. Methods: The 400‐MWT and 4‐m walk test were each repeated within 7 days. Results: The mean age±standard deviation of the study population was 84.3±6.3; 88.3% were women. Nineteen participants (31.7%) failed both 400‐MWTs, and 41 successfully completed both tests (kappa=1). Mean walking speed for the 4‐m test was 0.87±0.18 m/s for those who completed the 400‐MWT and 0.53±0.17 m/s for those who failed ( P <.001). The Spearman correlation coefficient between 4‐m and 400‐m walking speeds was 0.93. The estimated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve between 4‐m walking speed and the ability to perform the 400‐MWT was 0.91. The 4‐m gait speed averaged less than 0.6 m/s in 80% of subjects who failed the 400‐MWT. Conclusion: The test‐retest reliability for inability to complete the 400‐MWT is high. Four‐m walking speed is highly predictive of ability to perform the 400‐MWT. These findings may prove useful to future clinical trials and observational studies that involve assessment of mobility limitations in older adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52267.x

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: Association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 1994;49:M85-M94.
  2. Simonsick EM, Montgomery PS, Newman AB et al. Measuring fitness in healthy older adults: The Health ABC long-distance corridor walk. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49:1544-1548.
  3. Larsen AI, Aarsland T, Kristiansen M et al. Assessing the effect of exercise training in men with heart failure: Comparison of maximal, submaximal and endurance exercise protocols. Eur Heart J 2001;22:684-692.
  4. Enright PL, McBurnie MA, Bittner V et al. Cardiovascular Health Study. The 6-min walk test: A quick measure of functional status in elderly adults. Chest 2003;123:387-398.
  5. Guyatt GH, Sullivan MJ, Thompson PJ et al. The 6-minute walk: A new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Can Med Assoc J 1985;132:919-923.
  6. Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Salive ME et al. Effect of age and severity of disability on short-term variation in walking speed: The Women's Health and Aging Study. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:1089-1096.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rolland, Y. M., Cesari, M., Miller, M. E., Penninx, B. W., Atkinson, H. H., & Pahor, M.
Affiliations
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Hôpital de La Grave (FR)
Corresponding author
Rolland, Yves M.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-05-24
Volume
52
Issue
6
Pages
972-976
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1570598499
Cited by
194
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
FWCI
11.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (P30AG021332)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
test-retest reliability, walking speed, mobility limitations, older adults, gait analysis, functional capacity
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Reproducibility of Results, Geriatric Assessment, Walking, Exercise Tolerance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review