Cited by 280Frailty in Older AdultsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging, Health, and Disability

Association between lower digit symbol substitution test score and slower gait and greater risk of mortality and of developing incident disability in well-functioning older adults

Open access
Rosano, Caterina, Newman, Anne B., Katz, Ronit, Hirsch, Calvin H., Kuller, Lewis H.·2008·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether, in well‐functioning older adults, a lower score on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and slower gait are associated with greater risk of mortality and of developing incident disability independent of other risk factors, including brain structural abnormalities (white matter hyperintensities, brain infarcts, ventricular enlargement) and whether the combination of varying levels of DSST score and gait speed are associated with a greater risk of mortality and disability than low DSST or slow gait alone. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Three thousand one hundred fifty‐six (43% men, 29% black, mean age 70.4) participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), free from stroke and physical disability and with a modified Mini‐Mental State Examination (3MS) score of 80 or higher. MEASUREMENTS: Total mortality and incident disability (self‐report of any difficulty performing one or more of the six activities of daily living) ascertained over a median follow‐up time of 8.4 years. RESULTS: By the end of follow‐up, 704 participants had died and 1,096 had incident disability. In Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, race, education, cardiovascular disease, and brain magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities, lower DSST score and slower gait remained significantly associated with greater risk of mortality and of incident disability. Mortality rates were higher in those who had both low DSST score (<27 points) and slow gait (speed <1.0 m/s) than in those who had only low DSST score, only slow gait, or neither (rates per 1,000 person years (p‐y): 61.2, 42.8, 20.8, and 16.3, respectively). A similar risk gradient was observed for incident disability (82.0, 57.9, 47.9, and 36.0/1,000 p‐y, respectively). CONCLUSION: In well‐functioning older adults, low DSST score and slow gait, alone or in combination, could be risk factors for mortality and for developing disability, independent of other risk factors, including measures of brain integrity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01856.x

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosano, C., Newman, A. B., Katz, R., Hirsch, C. H., & Kuller, L. H.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Rosano, Caterina
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-09
Volume
56
Issue
9
Pages
1618-1625
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2105525405
Cited by
280
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (K23AG028966, R01AG029232, R03AG025076, P30AG024827)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
Digit Symbol Substitution Test, walking speed, mortality, incident disability, activities of daily living, cognitive impairment, older adults, white matter hyperintensities, cerebral infarction, ventriculomegaly, structural brain abnormalities, risk factors
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Atrophy, Brain, Brain Diseases, Cause of Death, Disability Evaluation, Discrimination Learning, Female, Gait, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychometrics, Psychomotor Performance, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Mobility Limitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review