Cited by 225Youth Development and Social SupportReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologySocial Capital and Networks

Religious Involvement and Educational Outcomes: The Role of Social Capital and Extracurricular Participation

Glanville, Jennifer L., Sikkink, David, Hernández, Edwin I.·2008·The Sociological Quarterly

Abstract

Previous research has observed that religious participation is positively related to a wide variety of adolescent outcomes, including academic achievement, but relatively little is known about why this is the case. We focus on a group of related potential explanations for why religious involvement improves educational outcomes. We examine whether religious participation enhances academic outcomes among teens by the way in which it shapes their social ties, or social capital, focusing on both intergenerational relationships and on relationships with peers. We also examine the potential intervening role of extracurricular participation. Using structural equation models to analyze data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), we examine the potential role of social capital and extracurricular participation in mediating the relationship between religious participation and academic achievement, dropping out of high school, and attachment to school. We find that religious attendance promotes higher intergenerational closure, friendship networks with higher educational resources and norms, and extracurricular participation. These intervening variables account for a small part of the influence of adolescent religious participation on the educational outcomes in this study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2007.00108.x

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 60 delinquency/crime studies with quality ratings of 7 or higher, 49 (82%) reported inverse relationships and only one study found a positive relationship.

    “Of the 60 studies with quality ratings of 7 or higher, 49 (82%) reported inverse relationships [240–252] and only one study found a positive relationship [253].”
  • For older adults, the most common source of social support outside family members comes from members of religious organizations.

    “For older adults in particular, the most common source of social support outside of family members comes from members of religious organizations [275, 276].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glanville, J. L., Sikkink, D., & Hernández, E. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
Corresponding author
Glanville, Jennifer L.
Venue
The Sociological Quarterly
Published
2008-02-01
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
105-137
ISSN
  • 0038-0253 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-8525
OpenAlex
W1907073014
Cited by
224
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
23.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sociological Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Notre Dame
  • University of Texas at Austin
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
Keywords
religious participation, youth religiosity, academic performance, social capital, extracurricular participation, intergenerational relations, peer relationships, school attachment, high school dropout, educational outcomes, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review