Cited by 70

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Differential profiling of human red blood cells during storage for 52 selected microRNAs

Kannan, Meganathan, Atreya, Chintamani·2010·Transfusion

Abstract

BACKGROUND: MicroRNAs (miRNAs), the negative regulators of cellular mRNAs, are present in mature red blood cells (RBCs) in abundance relative to other blood cells. So far, there are no studies aimed at identifying large‐scale miRNA profiles during storage of RBCs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: RNA samples from each RBC bag stored at 4°C were collected on Days 0, 20, and 40 and subjected to miRNA profiling by using a membrane‐based array. Fifty‐two selected miRNAs of cellular apoptotic pathway represent the array. Through bioinformatics analyses, we identified potential target genes for selected miRNAs. RESULTS: Differential profiling of RBCs for 52 miRNAs revealed two distinguishable patterns during storage: Forty‐eight miRNAs demonstrated no trend at all, while four miRNAs, miR‐96, miR‐150, miR‐196a, and miR‐197, demonstrated an increase up to Day 20 and subsequently decreased during storage. We selected miR‐96 and subjected it to standard bioinformatics analyses for target gene predictions, which identified several mRNAs including the RBC proapoptotic calpain small subunit‐1 (CAPNS1) as potential targets of miR‐96. To validate these predictions, we selected CAPNS1 mRNA as an example and confirmed its presence in the RBCs. Future experimental verification would help define miR‐96–CAPNS1 interaction, if any, in the stored RBCs. CONCLUSIONS: This study for the first time provided a differential profile of stored RBCs for selected miRNAs related to cellular apoptotic pathway and opened new avenues toward identification of novel in vitro RBC biomarkers of storage lesions. Future studies focusing on target gene‐miRNA interactions in stored RBCs would also unravel underlying mechanisms of storage lesions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02585.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Lee RI, 1914, The coagulation of normal human blood, an experimental study, Arch Intern Med, 13, 395
  2. 10.1084/jem.23.2.219 · DOI
  3. 10.1084/jem.23.2.239 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2008.01117.x · DOI
  5. 10.1053/tmrv.2002.35212 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02140.x · DOI
  7. Hoffman R, 2004, Hematology: basic principles and practice
  8. 10.1093/nar/gkh129 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.1089324 · DOI
  10. 10.1182/blood-2004-01-0042 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400946 · DOI
  12. 10.1371/journal.pone.0002360 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1073/pnas.242606799 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1101/gad.1025202 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Michael MZ, 2003, Reduced accumulation of specific microRNAs in colorectal neoplasia, Mol Cancer Res, 1, 882
  16. 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/nature03315 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00196.x · DOI
  19. 10.4161/cc.7.16.6453 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06624.x · DOI
  21. 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2008.01076.x · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.10.077 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1182/blood-2008-08-174854 · DOI
  24. 10.1186/1471-2121-9-22 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400905 · DOI
  26. 10.1126/science.1091903 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kannan, M., & Atreya, C.
Venue
Transfusion
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-07
Volume
50
Issue
7
Pages
1581-1588
ISSN
  • 0041-1132
  • 1537-2995
Cited by
70
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review