Cited by 137Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Female sex as a risk factor for stroke in atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study

Open access
MIKKELSEN, A.P., LINDHARDSEN, J., LIP, G.Y.H., GISLASON, G.H., TORP‐PEDERSEN, C., OLESEN, J.B.·2012·Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Abstract

Background Female sex has been suggested as a risk factor for stroke/thromboembolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and has therefore been included within risk scores, e.g., the CHA2 DS2 -VASc score, and guidelines.Objectives To investigate the risk of stroke/thromboembolism associated with female sex in non-valvular AF patients.Patients/methods Using the national Danish registers, we identified non-anticoagulated patients discharged with non-valvular AF (1997-2008), and subdivided the population into three age intervals: < 65, 65-74 and ≥ 75 years. We calculated stroke rates according to sex, and assessed the stroke risk associated with female sex by using Cox regression analysis.Results We included 87,202 AF patients, and 44,744 (51.3%) were female. The rate of stroke/thromboembolism for females aged < 65 and 65-74 years was not increased as compared with men, whereas the rate for females aged ≥ 75 years was increased. At both 1-year and 12-year follow-up, female sex did not increase the risk of stroke for patients aged < 75 years. At 1-year follow-up, the hazard ratios associated with female sex were 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-1.13) and 0.91 (95 CI 0.79-1.05) for patients aged < 65 and 65-74 years, respectively, and being female and aged ≥ 75 years was associated with an increased risk of stroke of 1.20 (95 CI 1.12-1.28).Conclusion Female sex was only associated with an increased risk of stroke for AF patients aged ≥ 75 years. Our study suggests that female sex should not be automatically included as an independent stroke/thromboembolic risk factor in guidelines or in the CHA2 DS2 -VASc score, without careful prior consideration of the 'age < 65 and lone AF' criterion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04853.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. The Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Risk factors for stroke and effi- cacy of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation. Analysis of pooled data from five randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 1449-57.
  2. The SPAF III Writing Committee for the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation at low risk of stroke during treatment with aspirin: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation III Study. JAMA 1998; 279: 1273-7.
  3. Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Study. Final results. Circulation 1991; 84: 527-39.
  4. Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Echocardiographic predictors of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a prospective study of 1066 patients from 3 clinical trials. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 1316-20.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MIKKELSEN, A. P., LINDHARDSEN, J., LIP, G. Y. H., GISLASON, G. H., TORP‐PEDERSEN, C., & OLESEN, J. B.
Affiliations
  • Gentofte Hospital (DK)
  • Birmingham City Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
MIKKELSEN, A.P.
Venue
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
1745-1751
ISSN
1538-7836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155301214
Cited by
137
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
female sex, stroke risk, non-valvular atrial fibrillation, thromboembolism, CHA2DS2-VASc score, sex as risk factor, elderly patients, anticoagulation, sex differences
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Atrial Fibrillation, Denmark, Female, Humans, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review