Cited by 257Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementCardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications

Comparison of the impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of stroke and cardiovascular death in women versus men (The Copenhagen City Heart Study)

Friberg, Jens, Scharling, Henrik, Gadsbøll, Niels, Truelsen, Thomas, Jensen, Gorm B.·2004·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

The Copenhagen City Heart Study is a population-based cohort study. Using baseline data from 3 cohort examinations (1976 to 1978, 1981 to 1983, and 1991 to 1994), we analyzed the gender-specific effect of atrial fibrillation (AF) on the risk of stroke and cardiovascular death during 5 years of follow-up. Baseline data from 29,310 subjects were included. AF was documented in 276 subjects (110 women and 166 men). During a mean follow-up of 4.7 years, 635 strokes were identified, 35 of which occurred in subjects who had AF (22 women and 13 men). After adjustment for age and co-morbidity, the effect of AF on the risk of stroke was 4.6-fold greater in women (hazard ratio 7.8, 95% confidence interval 5.8 to 14.3) than in men (hazard ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 3.0). Cardiovascular death occurred in 1,122 subjects, 63 of whom had AF (28 in women and 35 in men). The independent effect of AF on cardiovascular mortality rate was 2.5-fold greater in women (hazard ratio 4.4, 95% confidence interval 2.9 to 6.5) than in men (hazard ratio 2.2, 95% confidence interval 1.6 to 3.1). Our results indicate that AF is a much more pronounced risk factor for stroke and cardiovascular death in women than in men.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.06.023

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Friberg, J., Scharling, H., Gadsbøll, N., Truelsen, T., & Jensen, G. B.
Affiliations
Bispebjerg Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Friberg, Jens
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-10
Volume
94
Issue
7
Pages
889-894
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154464108
Cited by
257
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 24
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, stroke risk, cardiovascular mortality, sex differences, women, cardiovascular risk factors, Copenhagen City Heart Study
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cause of Death, Denmark, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Incidence, Multivariate Analysis, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review