Cited by 1,868Risk Perception and ManagementDisaster Management and ResiliencePublic Relations and Crisis Communication

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 114 of the 114 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical Modifications and Additional Evidence

Lindell, Michael K., Perry, Ronald W.·2012·Risk Analysis

DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The Protective Action Decision Model (PADM) is a multistage model that is based on findings from research on people's responses to environmental hazards and disasters. The PADM integrates the processing of information derived from social and environmental cues with messages that social sources transmit through communication channels to those at risk. The PADM identifies three critical predecision processes (reception, attention, and comprehension of warnings or exposure, attention, and interpretation of environmental/social cues)—that precede all further processing. The revised model identifies three core perceptions—threat perceptions, protective action perceptions, and stakeholder perceptions—that form the basis for decisions about how to respond to an imminent or long‐term threat. The outcome of the protective action decision‐making process, together with situational facilitators and impediments, produces a behavioral response. In addition to describing the revised model and the research on which it is based, this article describes three applications (development of risk communication programs, evacuation modeling, and adoption of long‐term hazard adjustments) and identifies some of the research needed to address unresolved issues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
Book Review: The Psychology of Attitudes
Chakravarti, D., Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1997) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151869 · Cited by 7,173
A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1
Rogers, R. W. (1975) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803 · Cited by 6,805
Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change
Marquart, F., & Naderer, B. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-09923-7_20 · Cited by 5,011
The Bases of Social Power
French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. H. (1986) · University of Pittsburgh Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/jj.12381759.38 · Cited by 4,544
Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment
(1978) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(78)90042-3 · Cited by 3,956
How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits
Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S. W., & Combs, B. (1978) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf00143739 · Cited by 2,838
Predicting and Changing Behavior
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011) · doi:10.4324/9780203838020 · Cited by 2,807
A Meta‐Analysis of Research on Protection Motivation Theory
Floyd, D. L., Prentice‐Dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (2000) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02323.x · Cited by 2,527
THE NATURE OF BELIEF SYSTEMS IN MASS PUBLICS
Converse, P. E. (2004) · Aarhus University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/jj.35529187.18 · Cited by 2,497

Show all 114 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

Mileti D S SorensenJH.Why people take precautions against natural disasters. Pp.296–320inWeinsteinN(ed).Taking Care: Why People Take Precautions. New York :Cambridge University Press 1987.
BurtonI Kates R WhiteGF.The Environment as Hazard 2nd edition. New York :Guildford Press 1993.
McGuireWJ.The nature of attitudes and attitude change. Pp.329–334inLindseyG AronsonE(eds).Handbook of Social Psychology 2nd edition. Reading MA :Addison‐Wesley 1969.
McGuireWJ.The nature of attitudes and attitude change. Pp.233–256inLindseyG AronsonE(eds).Handbook of Social Psychology 3rd edition. New York :Random House 1985.
RogersGO SorensenJH.Diffusion of emergency warnings.Environmental Professional 1988;10:185–198.
PalmR HodgsonM Blanchard RD LyonsD.Earthquake Insurance in California. Boulder CO :Westview Press 1990.
DavisMS.Living along the fault line: An update on earthquake awareness and preparedness in Southern California.Urban Resources 1989;5:8–14.
GarciaEM.Earthquake preparedness in California: A survey of Irvine residents.Urban Resources 1989;5:15–19.
WitheyS.Reaction to uncertain threat. Pp.93–123inBakerG ChapmanD(eds).Man and Society in Disaster. New York :Basic Books 1962.
BakerEJ.Hurricane evacuation in the United States. Pp.98–108inPielkeRJr PielkeRSr(eds).Storms Vol .1. London :Routledge 2000.
ProchaskaJO JohnsonS LeeP.The transtheoretical model of behavior change. Pp.59–84inGochmanDS(ed).Handbook of Health Behavior Research I: Personal and Social Determinants. New York :Plenum Press 1997.
SchumanH KaltonG.Survey methods. Pp.635–698inLindzeyG AronsonE(eds).The Handbook of Social Psychology 3rd edition Vol.1. Reading MA :Addison‐Wesley 1985.
GladwinH PeacockWG.Warning and evacuation: A night for hard houses. Pp.52–74inPeacockWG MorrowBH GladwinH(eds).Hurricane Andrew: Gender Ethnicity and the Sociology of Disasters. London :Routledge 1997.

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,867

Trust in stakeholders and social support: risk perception and preparedness by the Wenchuan earthquake survivors
Han, Z., Wang, L., & Cui, K. (2020) · Environmental Hazards · doi:10.1080/17477891.2020.1725410 · Cited by 80
How people make decisions during earthquakes and post-earthquake evacuation: Using Verbal Protocol Analysis in Immersive Virtual Reality
Feng, Z., González, V. A., Trotter, M., Spearpoint, M., Thomas, J., Ellis, D., & Lovreglio, R. (2020) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104837 · Cited by 80
Variable population exposure and distributed travel speeds in least-cost tsunami evacuation modelling
Fraser, S. A., Wood, N., Johnston, D. M., Leonard, G. S., Greening, P. D., & Rossetto, T. (2014) · Natural hazards and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-14-2975-2014 · Cited by 82
When the earth doesn’t stop shaking: How experiences over time influenced information needs, communication, and interpretation of aftershock information during the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence, New Zealand
Becker, J. S., Potter, S., McBride, S. K., Wein, A. M., Doyle, E. E. H., & Paton, D. (2018) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.12.009 · Cited by 79
Perceptions and expected immediate reactions to tornado warning polygons
Lindell, M., Huang, S.-K., Wei, H.-L., & Samuelson, C. D. (2015) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-015-1990-5 · Cited by 79
Self-citation
The impact of information sources on earthquake preparedness
Kirschenbaum, A. B., Rapaport, C., & Canetti, D. (2016) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.10.018 · Cited by 79
Influences of Sense of Place on Farming Households’ Relocation Willingness in Areas Threatened by Geological Disasters: Evidence from China
Xu, D., Peng, L., Liu, S., Su, C., Wang, X., & Chen, T. (2017) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Science · doi:10.1007/s13753-017-0112-2 · Cited by 78
Pragmatic and (or) Constitutive? On the Foundations of Contemporary Risk Communication Research
Rickard, L. N. (2019) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.13415 · Cited by 83
Earthquake early warning in Aotearoa New Zealand: a survey of public perspectives to guide warning system development
Becker, J., Potter, S., Vinnell, L. J., Nakayachi, K., McBride, S. K., & Johnston, D. M. (2020) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-020-00613-9 · Cited by 78
Wildfire risk modeling
Oliveira, S., Rocha, J., & Sá, A. C. L. (2021) · Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health · doi:10.1016/j.coesh.2021.100274 · Cited by 78
Towards the “Perfect” Weather Warning
Golding, B. W. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-98989-7 · Cited by 93
The Influence of Previous Disaster Experience and Sociodemographics on Protective Behaviors during Two Successive Tornado Events
Silver, A., & Andrey, J. (2013) · Weather Climate and Society · doi:10.1175/wcas-d-13-00026.1 · Cited by 78
From the periphery and toward a centralized model for trust in government risk and disaster communication
Liu, B. F., & Mehta, A. M. (2020) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2020.1773516 · Cited by 77
The protective action decision model: when householders choose their protective response to wildfire
Strahan, K., & Watson, S. (2018) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2018.1501597 · Cited by 76
Predicting consumers’ adoption of electric vehicles during the city smog crisis: An application of the protective action decision model
Liu, Y., Ouyang, Z., & Cheng, P. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.013 · Cited by 76
Testing public interventions for flash flood evacuation through environmental and social cues: The merit of virtual reality experiments
Fujimi, T., & Fujimura, K. (2020) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101690 · Cited by 76
Amplifying Panic and Facilitating Prevention: Multifaceted Effects of Traditional and Social Media Use During the 2015 MERS Crisis in South Korea
Seo, M. (2019) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699019857693 · Cited by 75
Tsunami risk communication and management: Contemporary gaps and challenges
Rafliana, I., Jalayer, F., Cerase, A., Cugliari, L., Baiguera, M., Salmanidou, D., Necmioğlu, Ö., Aguirre-Ayerbe, I., Lorito, S., Fraser, S. A., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102771 · Cited by 89
A Review of People’s Behavior in and around Floodwater
Becker, J., Taylor, H. L., Doody, B. J., Wright, K., Gruntfest, E. C., & Webber, D. J. (2015) · Weather Climate and Society · doi:10.1175/wcas-d-14-00030.1 · Cited by 74
Getting Canadians prepared for natural disasters: a multi-method analysis of risk perception, behaviors, and the social environment
Yong, A. G., & Lemyre, L. (2019) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-019-03669-2 · Cited by 74
Urban pluvial flood adaptation: Results of a household survey across four German municipalities
Dillenardt, L., Hudson, P., & Thieken, A. H. (2021) · Journal of Flood Risk Management · doi:10.1111/jfr3.12748 · Cited by 73
From Warning Messages to Preparedness Behavior: The Role of Risk Perception and Information Interaction in the Covid-19 Pandemic
Guo, Y., An, S., & Comes, T. (2022) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102871 · Cited by 76
Communicating Increased Risk: An Empirical Investigation of the National Weather Service’s Impact-Based Warnings
Casteel, M. A. (2016) · Weather Climate and Society · doi:10.1175/wcas-d-15-0044.1 · Cited by 80
Objective and perceived wildfire risk and its influence on private forest landowners' fuel reduction activities in Oregon's (USA) ponderosa pine ecoregion
Fischer, A. P., Kline, J., Ager, A., Charnley, S., & Olsen, K. (2014) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf12164 · Cited by 71
Social Media and Severe Weather: Do Tweets Provide a Valid Indicator of Public Attention to Severe Weather Risk Communication?
RIPBERGER, J. T., Jenkins‐Smith, H. C., Silva, C., Carlson, D. E., & Henderson, M. (2014) · Weather Climate and Society · doi:10.1175/wcas-d-13-00028.1 · Cited by 72
Pedestrian flow-path modeling to support tsunami evacuation and disaster relief planning in the U.S. Pacific Northwest
Wood, N., Jones, J. M., Schmidtlein, M. C., Schelling, J., & Frazier, T. G. (2016) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.05.010 · Cited by 77
Exploring the barriers for people taking protective actions during the 2012 and 2015 New Zealand ShakeOut drills
McBride, S. K., Becker, J., & Johnston, D. M. (2019) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101150 · Cited by 72
Mapping characteristics of at-risk population to disasters in the context of Brazilian early warning system
Alvalá, R. C. D. S., Dias, M. C. D. A., Saito, S. M., Stenner, C., Franco, C. D. O., de Souza, P. A., Ribeiro, J. V. M., Santana, R. A. S. D. M., & Nobre, C. A. (2019) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101326 · Cited by 71
Extending a broadly applicable measure of risk perception: the case for susceptibility
Walpole, H., & Wilson, R. S. (2020) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2020.1749874 · Cited by 71
Place Attachment and Household Disaster Preparedness: Examining the Mediation Role of Self-Efficacy
Wang, Z., Han, Z., Liu, L., & Yu, S. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18115565 · Cited by 70
Factors affecting the evacuation decisions of coastal households during Cyclone Aila in Bangladesh
Ahsan, M. N., Takeuchi, K., Vink, K., & Warner, J. F. (2015) · Environmental Hazards · doi:10.1080/17477891.2015.1114912 · Cited by 70
Adapting and coping with climate change in temperate forests
Fischer, A. P. (2018) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.10.011 · Cited by 70
Closing the Citizen-Government Communication Gap: Content, Audience, and Network Analysis of Government Tweets
Wukich, C., & Mergel, I. A. (2015) · Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management · doi:10.1515/jhsem-2014-0074 · Cited by 70
Explicating Experience: Development of a Valid Scale of Past Hazard Experience for Tornadoes
Demuth, J. L. (2018) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12983 · Cited by 69
Assessment of household-level food-energy-water nexus vulnerability during disasters
Dargin, J. S., Berk, A., & Mostafavi, A. (2020) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102366 · Cited by 69
Reusing social media information in government
Wukich, C., & Mergel, I. A. (2016) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.011 · Cited by 81
Self-evacuation archetypes in Australian bushfire
Strahan, K., Whittaker, J., & Handmer, J. W. (2017) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.10.016 · Cited by 69
Designing Effective Tsunami Messages: Examining the Role of Short Messages and Fear in Warning Response
Sutton, J. N., Vos, S. C., Wood, M. M., & Turner, M. M. (2017) · Weather Climate and Society · doi:10.1175/wcas-d-17-0032.1 · Cited by 69
An Empirical Study of the Volkswagen Crisis in China: Customers’ Information Processing and Behavioral Intentions
Wei, J., Zhao, M., Wang, F., Cheng, P., & Zhao, D. (2015) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12446 · Cited by 65
Predicting self-evacuation in Australian bushfire
Strahan, K., Whittaker, J., & Handmer, J. W. (2018) · Environmental Hazards · doi:10.1080/17477891.2018.1512468 · Cited by 65
Let's talk about flood risk – Evaluating a series of workshops on private flood protection
Heidenreich, A., Masson, T., & Bamberg, S. (2020) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101880 · Cited by 63
Differences in disaster preparedness between urban and rural communities in China
Chai, L., Han, Y., Han, Z., Wei, J., & Zhao, Y. (2020) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.102020 · Cited by 63
Modeling Evacuate versus Shelter-in-Place Decisions in Wildfires
Cova, T. J., Dennison, P. E., & Drews, F. A. (2011) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su3101662 · Cited by 62
Obtaining Information From Different Sources Matters During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Chu, L., Fung, H. H.-L., Tse, D. C. K., Tsang, V. H. L., Zhang, H., & Mai, C. (2020) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnaa222 · Cited by 63
A Protection-Motivation Perspective to Explain Intention to Use and Continue to Use Mobile Warning Systems
Fischer-Preßler, D., Bonaretti, D., & Fischbach, K. (2021) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-021-00704-0 · Cited by 62
Modeling Risk Attitudes in Evacuation Departure Choices
Dixit, V. V., Wilmot, C. G., & Wolshon, B. (2012) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/2312-17 · Cited by 68
Earthquake early warning message testing: Visual attention, behavioral responses, and message perceptions
Sutton, J. N., Fischer, L. M., James, L. E., & Sheff, S. E. (2020) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101664 · Cited by 62
Farmers' disaster preparedness and quality of life in earthquake-prone areas: The mediating role of risk perception
Qing, C., Guo, S., Deng, X., & Xu, D. (2021) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102252 · Cited by 64
Risk Perception and Coping Behavior of Construction Workers on Occupational Health Risks—A Case Study of Nanjing, China
Liu, H., Li, J., Li, H., Li, H., Mao, P., & Yuan, J. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18137040 · Cited by 61
Psychological factors and social processes influencing wildfire smoke protective behavior: Insights from a case study in Northern California
Santana, F. N., González, D. J. X., & Wong‐Parodi, G. (2021) · Climate Risk Management · doi:10.1016/j.crm.2021.100351 · Cited by 63
“Sometimes da #beachlife ain't always da wave”: Understanding People’s Evolving Hurricane Risk Communication, Risk Assessments, and Responses Using Twitter Narratives
Demuth, J. L., Morss, R. E., Palen, L. A., Anderson, K. M., Anderson, J., Kogan, M., Stowe, K., Bica, M., Lazrus, H., Wilhelmi, O. V., et al. (2018) · Weather Climate and Society · doi:10.1175/wcas-d-17-0126.1 · Cited by 61
Information credibility, disaster risk perception and evacuation willingness of rural households in China
Xu, D., Zhou, W., Deng, X., Ma, Z., Yong, Z., & Qin, C. (2020) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-020-04106-5 · Cited by 60
Washington households' expected responses to lahar threat from Mt. Rainier
Wei, H.-L., & Lindell, M. K. (2016) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.10.014 · Cited by 61
Self-citation
Conditions for citizen co-production in a resilient, efficient and legitimate flood risk governance arrangement. A tentative framework
Mees, H., Crabbé, A., & Driessen, P. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · doi:10.1080/1523908x.2017.1299623 · Cited by 62
Media Exposure, Disaster Experience, and Risk Perception of Rural Households in Earthquake-Stricken Areas: Evidence from Rural China
Xu, D., Zhuang, L., Deng, X., Qing, C., & Yong, Z. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17093246 · Cited by 60
Does updating natural hazard maps to reflect best practices increase viewer comprehension of risk?
MacPherson‐Krutsky, C., Brand, B. D., & Lindell, M. K. (2020) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101487 · Cited by 59
Self-citation
Stakeholder Perceptions of Nature-Based Solutions and Their Collaborative Co-Design and Implementation Processes in Rural Mountain Areas—A Case Study From PHUSICOS
Lupp, G., Huang, J. J., Zingraff‐Hamed, A., Oen, A. M. P., Seppia, N. D., Martinelli, A., Lucchesi, M., Wullf-Knutsen, T., Olsén, M., Fjøsne, T. F., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2021.678446 · Cited by 66
How Solutions Journalism Shapes Support for Collective Climate Change Adaptation
Thier, K., & Lin, T. (2022) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2022.2143842 · Cited by 72
The influence of risk awareness and government trust on risk perception and preparedness for natural hazards
Cisternas, P. C., Cifuentes, L. A., Bronfman, N. C., & Repetto, P. B. (2023) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.14151 · Cited by 58
Improving Flood Risk Communication by Focusing on Prevention‐Focused Motivation
de Boer, J., Botzen, W. J. W., & Terpstra, T. (2013) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12091 · Cited by 58
Building resiliency: a cross-sectional study examining relationships among health-related quality of life, well-being, and disaster preparedness
Gowan, M. E., Kirk, R. C., & Sloan, J. A. (2014) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-12-85 · Cited by 64
Perceptions of earthquake early warnings on the U.S. West Coast
Dunn, P. T., Ahn, A. Y. E., Bostrom, A., & Vidale, J. E. (2016) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.10.019 · Cited by 58
Reasons for non-compliance with cyclone evacuation orders in Bangladesh
Saha, S. K., & James, H. (2016) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.12.009 · Cited by 58
Modelling evacuation decision-making in the 2016 Chimney Tops 2 fire in Gatlinburg, TN
Kuligowski, E. D., Walpole, E. H., Lovreglio, R., & McCaffrey, S. (2020) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf20038 · Cited by 58
Tsunami response behaviour during and following two local-source earthquakes in Wellington, New Zealand
Fraser, S. A., Doyle, E. E. H., Wright, K., Potter, S., McClure, J., Johnston, D. M., Leonard, G. S., Coomer, M. A., Becker, J., & Johal, S. (2016) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.02.008 · Cited by 57
Exploring the Predictors of Organizational Preparedness for Natural Disasters
Sadiq, A., & Graham, J. D. (2015) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12478 · Cited by 57
How consumers' perception and information processing affect their acceptance of genetically modified foods in China: A risk communication perspective.
Guo, Q.-Z., Yao, N.-Z., & Zhu, W.-W. (2020) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109518 · Cited by 57
Financial Preparation, Disaster Experience, and Disaster Risk Perception of Rural Households in Earthquake-Stricken Areas: Evidence From the Wenchuan and Lushan Earthquakes in China’s Sichuan Province
Xu, D., Yong, Z., Deng, X., Liu, Y., Huang, K., Zhou, W., & Ma, Z. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16183345 · Cited by 56
The Efficacy of Virtual Reality in Climate Change Education Increases with Amount of Body Movement and Message Specificity
Queiroz, A. C. M., Fauville, G., Abeles, A. T., Levett, A., & Bailenson, J. N. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15075814 · Cited by 65
Warning Triggers in Environmental Hazards: Who Should Be Warned to Do What and When?
Cova, T. J., Dennison, P. E., Li, D., Drews, F. A., Siebeneck, L. K., & Lindell, M. K. (2016) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12651 · Cited by 62
Self-citation
Flooding in The Netherlands: How people's interpretation of personal, social and institutional resources influence flooding preparedness
Kerstholt, J. H., Duijnhoven, H., & Paton, D. (2017) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.05.013 · Cited by 56
Avoiding Trouble: Exploring Environmental Risk Information Avoidance Intentions.
Kahlor, L. A., Olson, H. C., Markman, A. B., & Wang, W. (2018) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916518799149 · Cited by 59
Consumer perceptions of genetically modified foods: a mixed-method approach
Lefebvre, S., Cook, L. A., & Griffiths, M. A. (2019) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-12-2016-2043 · Cited by 56
Effects of information strategies on public acceptance of nuclear energy
Hu, X., Zhu, W., & Wei, J. (2021) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.120907 · Cited by 55
Evacuation behavior of affected individuals and households in response to the 2018 Attica wildfires: From empirical data to models
Katzilieris, K., Vlahogianni, E. I., & Wang, H. (2022) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105799 · Cited by 55
Public reactions to the 2013 Chinese H7N9 Influenza outbreak: perceptions of risk, stakeholders, and protective actions
Wang, F., Wei, J., Huang, S., Lindell, M. K., Ge, Y., & Wei, H.-L. (2016) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2016.1247377 · Cited by 55
Self-citation
An Integrated Scenario Ensemble‐Based Framework for Hurricane Evacuation Modeling: Part 1—Decision Support System
Davidson, R. A., Nozick, L. K., Wachtendorf, T., Blanton, B., Colle, B. A., Kolar, R. L., DeYoung, S. E., Dresback, K. M., Yi, W., Yang, K., et al. (2018) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12990 · Cited by 55
Development of an Interactive Escape Room Intervention to Educate College Students about Earthquake Preparedness
Novak, J., Lozos, J. C., & Spear, S. E. (2018) · Natural Hazards Review · doi:10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000322 · Cited by 55
My Community, My Preparedness: The Role of Sense of Place, Community, and Confidence in Government in Disaster Readiness
DeYoung, S. E., & Peters, M. (2016) · International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters · doi:10.1177/028072701603400204 · Cited by 59
Public Support for Policies to Reduce Risk After Hurricane Sandy
Greenberg, M., Weiner, M. D., Noland, R. B., Herb, J., Kaplan, M., & Broccoli, A. J. (2014) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12203 · Cited by 54
Tsunami preparedness and resilience in the Cascadia Subduction Zone: A multistage model of expected evacuation decisions and mode choice
Chen, C., Lindell, M. K., & Wang, H. (2021) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102244 · Cited by 54
Self-citation
Risk preference, risk perception as predictors of risky driving behaviors: the moderating effects of gender, age, and driving experience
Jing, L., Shan, W., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · Journal of Transportation Safety & Security · doi:10.1080/19439962.2022.2086953 · Cited by 54
Mapping individuals' earthquake preparedness in China
Wu, G., Han, Z., Xu, W., & Gong, Y. (2018) · Natural hazards and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-18-1315-2018 · Cited by 54
Pre-evacuation Time Estimation Based Emergency Evacuation Simulation in Urban Residential Communities
Chen, J., Yu, J. L., Wen, J., Zhang, C., Yin, Z., Wu, J., & Yao, S. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16234599 · Cited by 54
Children's earthquake preparedness and risk perception: A comparative study of two cities in Turkey, using a modified PRISM approach
Yildiz, A., Teeuw, R. M., Dickinson, J., & Roberts, J. (2020) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101666 · Cited by 54
Climate change, the Great Barrier Reef and the response of Australians
Goldberg, J., Marshall, N., Birtles, A., Case, P., Bohensky, E. L., Curnock, M., Gooch, M., Parry-Husbands, H., PERT, P. L., Tobin, R., et al. (2016) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/palcomms.2015.46 · Cited by 54
“Can You Take the Heat?” Heat-Induced Health Symptoms Are Associated with Protective Behaviors
Esplin, E. D., Marlon, J. R., Leiserowitz, A., & Howe, P. D. (2019) · Weather Climate and Society · doi:10.1175/wcas-d-18-0035.1 · Cited by 54
Improving Hazard Map Comprehension for Protective Action Decision Making
Lindell, M. K. (2020) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2020.00027 · Cited by 59
Self-citation
Flood risk perception and responses among urban residents in the northeastern United States
Zinda, J. A., Williams, L., Kay, D. L., & Alexander, S. M. (2021) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102528 · Cited by 56
Engaging communities to prepare for natural hazards: a conceptual model
Johnston, K. A., Taylor, M., & Ryan, B. (2022) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-022-05290-2 · Cited by 52
Recommendations for increasing the reach and effectiveness of heat risk education and warning messaging
VanderMolen, K., Kimutis, N., & Hatchett, B. J. (2022) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103288 · Cited by 57
Strategic storm flood evacuation planning for large coastal cities enables more effective transfer of elderly populations
Yin, J., Yang, Y., Yu, D., Lin, N., Wilby, R. L., Lane, S. N., Sun, B., Bricker, J. D., Wright, N., Yang, L., et al. (2024) · Nature Water · doi:10.1038/s44221-024-00210-z · Cited by 54
Do Hazard Mitigation and Preparedness Reduce Physical Damage to Businesses in Disasters? Critical Role of Business Disaster Planning
Xiao, Y., & Peacock, W. G. (2014) · Natural Hazards Review · doi:10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000137 · Cited by 52
The Proof is in the Picture: The Influence of Imagery and Experience in Perceptions of Hurricane Messaging
Rickard, L. N., Schuldt, J. P., Eosco, G. M., Scherer, C. W., & Daziano, R. A. (2017) · Weather Climate and Society · doi:10.1175/wcas-d-16-0048.1 · Cited by 52
A sequential model to link contextual risk, perception and public support for flood adaptation policy
Shao, W., Xian, S., Lin, N., & Small, M. J. (2017) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.05.072 · Cited by 52
Actionable and understandable? Evidence-based recommendations for the design of (multi-)hazard warning messages
Dallo, I., Stauffacher, M., & Marti, M. (2022) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102917 · Cited by 59
Individual heat adaptation: Analyzing risk communication, warnings, heat risk perception, and protective behavior in three German cities
Heidenreich, A., & Thieken, A. H. (2024) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.14278 · Cited by 56
The effects of fatalism and denial on earthquake preparedness levels
Baytiyeh, H., & Naja, M. K. (2016) · Disaster Prevention and Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/dpm-07-2015-0168 · Cited by 51
Assessment of households’ responses to the tsunami threat: A comparative study of Japan and New Zealand
Wei, H.-L., Wu, H., Lindell, M. K., Prater, C. S., Shiroshita, H., Johnston, D. M., & Becker, J. (2017) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.011 · Cited by 51
Self-citation
Conceptual Framework for Motivating Actions towards Disaster Preparedness Through Risk Communication
Abunyewah, M., Gajendran, T., & Maund, K. (2018) · Procedia Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.032 · Cited by 51

Authors: Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W.
Affiliations: Texas A&M University (US)
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author: Lindell, Michael K.
ORCID: Lindell, Michael K.
Venue: Risk Analysis
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 2011-06-20
Volume: 32
Issue: 4
Pages: 616-632
ISSN: 0272-4332 (ISSN-L)
1539-6924
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x
OpenAlex: W2139452699
Semantic Scholar: 01136b8cc8a5b5fcf6bcd2578fb3cfef2acb6b4d
Cited by: 1,868
References: 114
Citations by year: 2026: 268 · 2025: 212 · 2024: 198 · 2023: 176 · 2022: 205 · 2021: 182 · 2020: 140 · 2019: 104 · 2018: 110 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 12
FWCI: 82.96
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations: Risk Analysis (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders: National Science Foundation
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Keywords: Protective Action Decision Model, environmental hazards, disaster response, risk communication, evacuation modeling, threat perception, stakeholder perspectives, social cues
MeSH terms: Decision Making, Decision Support Techniques, Disasters, Humans, Perception, Risk, Hazardous Substances, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical Modifications and Additional Evidence

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks