Cited by 113

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Informed Society: An Analysis of the Public's Information‐Seeking Behavior Regarding Coastal Flood Risks

Kellens, Wim, Zaalberg, Ruud, De Maeyer, Philippe·2012·Risk Analysis

Abstract

Recent flood risk management puts an increasing emphasis on the public's risk perception and its preferences. It is now widely recognized that a better knowledge of the public's awareness and concern about risks is of vital importance to outline effective risk communication strategies. Models such as Risk Information Seeking and Processing address this evolution by considering the public's needs and its information‐seeking behavior with regard to risk information. This study builds upon earlier information‐seeking models and focuses on the empirical relationships between information‐seeking behavior and the constructs of risk perception, perceived hazard knowledge, response efficacy, and information need in the context of coastal flood risks. Specific focus is given to the mediating role of information need in the model and to the differences in information‐seeking behavior between permanent and temporary residents. By means of a structured on‐line questionnaire, a cross‐sectional survey was carried out in the city of Ostend, one of the most vulnerable places to coastal flooding on the Belgian coast. Three hundred thirteen respondents participated in the survey. Path analysis reveals that information need does not act as a mediator in contrast to risk perception and perceived knowledge. In addition, it is shown that risk perception and perceived hazard knowledge are higher for permanent than temporary residents, leading to increased information‐seeking behavior among the former group. Implications for risk communication are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01743.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Schanze J., 2007, Flood Risk Management Research—From Extreme Events to Citizens Involvement, 1
  2. 10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00119-1 · DOI
  3. 10.1080/13669870902726091 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01222.x · DOI
  5. Renn O, 2005, White Paper on Risk Governance: Towards an Integrative Approach
  6. 10.1007/s11069-011-9845-1 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.2307/3096875 · DOI
  8. Paton D, 2001, Responding to hazard effects: Promoting resilience and adjustment adoption, Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 16, 47
  9. Ter Huurne E, 2008, Information seeking in a risky world. The theoretical and empirical development of FRIS: A framework of risk information seeking
  10. 10.1177/1075547007312309 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1080/13669870701875750 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Mertens T, 2010, Coastal management and disaster planning on the basis of flood risk calculations
  13. Kaiser G, COMRISK subproject 3: Public perception of coastal flood defence and participation in coastal flood defence planning. Schleswig‐Holstein State Ministry of the Interior–Coastal Defence Division
  14. 10.1111/j.1467-7717.1996.tb00514.x · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0261-5177(00)00048-0 · DOI
  16. Gunst C, 2008, Tweede Verblijven in Breedbeeld, West-Vlaanderen Werkt, 3, 14
  17. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01571.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. Eagly AH, 1993, The Psychology of Attitudes
  19. 10.1207/s1532785xmep0601_2 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/BF00143739 · DOI
  21. 10.1126/science.3563507 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.2166/wst.2006.573 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.006 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02550.x · DOI
  26. 10.1007/s11069-008-9337-0 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01032.x · DOI
  28. 10.5194/nhess-9-1247-2009 · DOI
  29. 10.5194/nhess-10-2081-2010 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00773.x · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00866.x · DOI
  32. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00792.x · DOI
  33. 10.1007/s11069-005-8604-6 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00741.x · DOI
  35. 10.1016/0964-5691(92)90026-H · DOI
  36. Mertens T, 2008, An integrated master plan for Flanders future coastal safety, in 31st International Conference on Coastal Engineering: Meeting Coastal Challenges
  37. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01616.x · DOI
  38. Terpstra T, 2010, Flood Preparedness: Thoughts, Feelings and Intentions of the Dutch Public [Doctoral Thesis]
  39. 10.1177/00139160021972621 · DOI
  40. Jöreskog KG, 1993, LISREL 8 User's Reference Guide
  41. 10.1080/10705519909540118 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 113

Metadata

Authors
Kellens, W., Zaalberg, R., & De Maeyer, P.
Venue
Risk Analysis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12-09
Volume
32
Issue
8
Pages
1369-1381
ISSN
  • 0272-4332
  • 1539-6924
Cited by
113
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review