Cited by 344Education, Achievement, and GiftednessCareer Development and DiversitySocial and Intergroup Psychology

Problems in the pipeline: stereotype threat and women's achievement in high-level math courses

Good, Catherine, Aronson, Joshua, Harder, Jayne Ann·2008·Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appdev.2007.10.004

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gender-based stereotype threat can be particularly malignant in STEM fields and can cause women to disidentify with an entire profession.

    “Gender-based stereotype threat can be particularly malignant in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields (Good, Aronson, & Harder, 2008;Shapiro & Williams, 2012); it can cause women to disidentify with an entire profession and leave few women in the pipeline to assume leadership roles.”

    From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Good, Aronson, & Harder, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Good, C., Aronson, J., & Harder, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
  • Good, Catherine
  • Aronson, Joshua
  • Harder, Jayne Ann
Venue
Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
17-28
ISSN
0193-3973 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971688829
Cited by
343
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 15
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
stereotype threat, women in mathematics, university mathematics, test performance, field experiments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review