Cited by 94Aging and Gerontology ResearchCognitive Functions and MemoryMemory Processes and Influences

Perceived Control Over Memory Aging: Developmental and Intervention Perspectives

Lachman, Margie E.·1991·Journal of Social Issues

Abstract

Age differences in control beliefs were examined for several domains, including intellectual aging and memory, with a sample of 200 adults (ages 20–89). There were no age differences in control beliefs for the interpersonal or political domains. For the domains of health and intellectual aging, however, the older adults had lower internal control and higher external control beliefs than young and middle‐aged adults. The implications of these control beliefs are considered in the context of memory aging and memory training programs. A program of research is described that involves teaching older adults memory strategies in conjunction with cognitive restructuring of beliefs about the controllability of memory. The goal of the program is to optimize memory performance and attitudes about memory, as well as to identify some of the self‐appraisal and motivational mechanisms involved in memory aging.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1991.tb01840.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lachman, M. E.
Affiliations
Brandeis University (US)
Corresponding author
Lachman, Margie E.
Venue
Journal of Social Issues
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-01
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
159-175
ISSN
  • 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4560
OpenAlex
W2017402802
Cited by
94
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Social Issues (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
perceived control, memory aging, age differences, internal control, external control, memory training, cognitive restructuring, older adults, memory strategies, self-assessment, motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review