Perceived Control Over Memory Aging: Developmental and Intervention Perspectives
Abstract
Age differences in control beliefs were examined for several domains, including intellectual aging and memory, with a sample of 200 adults (ages 20–89). There were no age differences in control beliefs for the interpersonal or political domains. For the domains of health and intellectual aging, however, the older adults had lower internal control and higher external control beliefs than young and middle‐aged adults. The implications of these control beliefs are considered in the context of memory aging and memory training programs. A program of research is described that involves teaching older adults memory strategies in conjunction with cognitive restructuring of beliefs about the controllability of memory. The goal of the program is to optimize memory performance and attitudes about memory, as well as to identify some of the self‐appraisal and motivational mechanisms involved in memory aging.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Measures of personal control over one's own health better predict older adults' seeking treatment for illness than general control measures do.
“Measures of personal control over one's own health better predict older adults' seeking of treatment for illness than do general control measures (Lachman, 1991).”
From Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced? (2008) · cites this paper as Lachman, 1991
Cites
Cognitive Therapy of Depression
HOLLON, S. D., & BECK, A. T. (1979) · Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-404480-7.50012-5 · Cited by 4,685 · see citing works
Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy.
Bandura, A. (1989) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.25.5.729 · Cited by 1,900 · see citing works
Evans, D. A. (1989) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1989.03430180093036 · Cited by 1,226 · see citing works
Can decline in adult intellectual functioning be reversed?
Schaie, K. W., & Willis, S. L. (1986) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.22.2.223 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A life-span theory of control.
Heckhausen, J., & Schulz, R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.284 · Cited by 1,844 · see citing works
Hertzog, C., Kramer, A. F., Wilson, R. S., & Lindenberger, U. (2008) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01034.x · Cited by 1,495 · see citing works
Lachman, M. E. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141521 · Cited by 664 · see citing works
Self-citationHoogenhout, E. M., de Groot, R. H. M., van der Elst, W., & Jolles, J. (2012) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2011.598846 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lachman, M. E.
- Affiliations
- Brandeis University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lachman, Margie E.
- ORCID
- Lachman, Margie E.
- Venue
- Journal of Social Issues
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 159-175
- ISSN
- 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4560
- OpenAlex
- W2017402802
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Social Issues (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- perceived control, memory aging, age differences, internal control, external control, memory training, cognitive restructuring, older adults, memory strategies, self-assessment, motivation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review